Lexical differences in pro-life and pro-choice Facebook discussion groups
PDF (Język Polski)

How to Cite

Ćwierz, K., Cossengue Casimiro, R., & Konat, B. (2018). Lexical differences in pro-life and pro-choice Facebook discussion groups. Investigationes Linguisticae, 37, 34–43. https://doi.org/10.14746/il.2017.37.3.

Abstract

An individual approach to abortion is based on a perspective which is determined by a combination of personal  knowledge and life values. The aim of this paper is to provide empirical analysis of lexical differences between two discussion groups representing opposing views regarding the acceptability of abortion. Our aim to show how lexical choices made by the speakers in the two groups correspond to the divergent worldviews represented in those groups. Material for the study was collected on Facebook and analysed using methods of statistical machine learning with lexical feature sets (i.e. bag-of-words and n-gram). Additional analysis for keywords in both groups was also conducted.

https://doi.org/10.14746/il.2017.37.3.
PDF (Język Polski)

References

Anthony, L. (2013). Developing AntConc for a new generation of corpus linguists. Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics Conference (CL 2013), July 22-26, 2013. Lancaster University, UK, pp. 14-16.

Apache OpenNLP (2017). The Apache Software Foundation. (Dostęp 2 kwietnia 2017). Strona oprogramowania: https://opennlp.apache.org/

Bartmiński, J. (1999). Językowy obraz świata. Wydaw. Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej.

Gabrielatos, C., Baker P. (2008). "Fleeing, sneaking, flooding: A corpus analysis of discursive constructions of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press, 1996-2005." Journal of English linguistics 36.1: 5-38.

Getek, K., Cunningham, M. (1996). A Sheep in Wolf's Clothing – Language and the Abortion Debate. Princeton Progressive Review.

Graph API. Facebook Platform. (Dostęp 2 kwietnia 2017). Strona platformy: https://developers.facebook.com/docs/graph-api/overview/

Holstein, J., Gubrium, J. (2008). Handbook of Constructionist Research. Guilford Press.

I Am Pro-Life (Dostęp 2 kwietnia 2017). [Post w serwisie Facebook]. Pobrane z: https://www.facebook.com/search/top/?q=There%20are%20really%20only%20four%20ways%20the%20unborn%20differ%20from%20toddlers.&init=mag_glass&tas=0.3334654532434831&search_first_focus=1492182043994

Kischer, W. A human embryologist answers :"When does life begin". (Dostęp 2 kwietnia 2017). [Materiał wideo].

Fabiszak, M. , Konat, B. (2013), “Zastosowanie korpusów językowych w językoznawstwie kognitywnym”, Metodologie językoznawstwa 1:131–142.

Kozak, J., Boryczka, U. (2014). Budowa ukierunkowanych klasyfikatorów z zastosowaniem algorytmu ACDT. Systemy inteligencji obliczeniowej, Chorzów.

Lopez, R. (2012). Perspectives on Abortion: Pro-Choice, Pro-Life, and What Lies in between. European Journal of Social Sciences, 27(4), 511-517.

Mathewes-Green, F. (1996). Pro-life, pro-choice: Can we talk? Christian Century, 113.

NARAL Pro-Choice America (Dostęp 2 kwietnia 2017). [Post w serwisie Facebook]. Pobrane z: https://www.facebook.com/naralprochoiceamerica/posts/10155193760449321

National Pro-Life Alliance (2 kwietnia 2017). [Post w serwisie Facebook]. Pobrane z: https://www.facebook.com/ProLifeAlliance/photos/a.153781571335145.28267.145170355529600/1380658641980759/?type=3&theater

OpenRefine (2011). Google, open source community. (Dostęp 2 kwietnia 2017). Strona oprogramowania: http://openrefine.org/

Rowbotham, S. (1977). A New World for Women: Stella Browne, social feminist. pp. 66–67.