Kilka uwag na temat stosowania systemu zewnętrznej oceny jakości w szkolnictwie wyższym: podstawowe zasady i warunki

Main Article Content

Antonius I. Vroeijenstijn

Abstrakt

W artykule omówiono przyczyny zainteresowania rządów, społeczeństw i samych szkół wyższych tworzeniem systemów zewnętrznej oceny jakości kształcenia. Wyróżniono dwa podejścia do oceny jakości: syntetyczne, końcowe (typowe dla strony rządowej) oraz kształtujące (typowe dla uczelni). Poddano także krytycznej analizie rolę wskaźników osiągnięć (performance indicators) w procesie oceniania jakości kształcenia oraz różne sposoby oceny jakości stosowane w krajach Zachodu. Na zakończenie przedstawiono podstawowe zasady opracowania systemu zewnętrznej oceny jakości.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Jak cytować
Vroeijenstijn, A. I. (2016). Kilka uwag na temat stosowania systemu zewnętrznej oceny jakości w szkolnictwie wyższym: podstawowe zasady i warunki. Nauka I Szkolnictwo Wyższe, (1(5), 158-179. Pobrano z https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/nsw/article/view/4485
Dział
Tłumaczenia
Biogram autora

Antonius I. Vroeijenstijn, Stowarzyszenie Uniwersytetów Holenderskich (VSNU)

Antonius I. Vroeijenstijn - członek Stowarzyszenia Uniwersytetów Holenderskich (VSNU), koordynator programu zewnętrznej oceny jakości kształcenia.

Referencje

  1. Ball Ch. 1985 Whatthe Hell is Quality? W: tegoż: Fitness forPurpose. Guildford: SRHE.
  2. Ball Ch., Hallwachi J. 1987 Performance Indicators in Higher Education. „Higher Education”, vol. 4, nr 16.
  3. Barnett R. 1993 lmproving Higher Education, Total Quality Care. Milton Keynes - London: SRHE/Open University Press.
  4. Bauer M. 1993 Periormance-based Funding and Institutional Quality Assurance and Development. Paper presented atthe 15th Annual EAIR Forum, Turku, Finland.
  5. Cave M., Hanney S., Kogan M, Trevet G. 1988 The Use of Performance Indicators in Higher Education. A Critical Analysis of Developing Practice. London: Jessica Kingsley Publ.
  6. Dochy F.J.R.C., Seghers M.S.R., Wijnen W.H.F.W. (eds.) 1990 Management Information and Performance Indicators in Higher Education, an International Issue. Assen/Maastricht: Van Gorcum.
  7. Frederiks M.M.H., Weslerheijden D.F., Weusthof P.J.M. 1993 InterneZorg en Externe Prikkel. Amsterdam: Ministerie van O&W, SDU.
  8. Geodegebuure L.C.J., Maassen P.A.M., Westerheijolen D. (eds.) 1990 Peer Review and Performance Indicators. Quality Assessment in British and Dutch Higher Education. CHEPS; Utrecht: Lemma.
  9. Kells H.R. 1989 Self-study Processes. A Guide for Post-secondary Institutions. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company. Third edition.
  10. Kells H.R. 1990 The lnadeqancy of Performance Indicators for Higher Education: The Need for a More Comprehensive and Development Construct. „Higher Education Management”, vol. 2, nr 3, Paris: OECD.
  11. Kells H.R. 1992 Self-regulation in Higher Education. A Multi-national Perspective on Collaborative Systems of Quality Assurance and Control. London: Jessica Kingsley Publ.
  12. Kells H.R. 1993 External Quality Assessment in the Netherlands after Five Years: A Policy Analyses. Paper delivered 3 March 1993 atthe VSNU Congress, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
  13. Lynton E.A. 1988 The Role of Self-study in Quality Assessment of Institutions of Higher Education. W: Ministerie van O&W.: 1/erlag van de Conferentie Kwaliteitsbewaking Hoger Onderwijs, Noordwijkerhout, 3 en 4 mei. Zoetermeer.
  14. Ministerie van O&W 1985 Hoger Onderwijs: Autonomie en Kwaliteit. Gravenhage: Staatsuitgeverij.
  15. Ministerie van O&W 1989 Ontwerp Hoger Onderwijs en Onderzoek Plan 1990. Gravenhage: SDU.
  16. Mintzberg H. 1983 Structure in Fives; Designing Effective Organizations. Prentice Hall Inc.
  17. Moodie G.C. (ed.) 1986 Standards and Criteria in Higher Education. Guildford: SRHE.
  18. Ottenwaelter M. 1993 The Approach of the Comite National dEvaluation of France. Contribution to the European Seminar on Quality Assessment. London: Quality Support Centre of the Open University.
  19. Seghers M.S.R., Dochy F.J.R.C., Wijnen W.H.F.W. 1989 Een Set van Prestatie-lndicatoren iroor de Bestuurluke Omgang Tussen Overheid en Instellingen voor Hoger Onderwus.
  20. Sizer J. 1990 Performance Indicators and the Management of Universities in the UK. W: Dochy F.J.R.C., Seghers M.S.R., Wijnen W.H.F.W. (eds.): Management Information and Performance Indicators in Higher Education, an International Issue. Assen/Maastricht: Van Gorcum.
  21. Spee A.A.J., Bormans R. 1991 Performance Indicators in Gomnment - Institutional Relations. OECD, Thirtieth Special Topie Workshop „Performance Indicators in Higher Education”, Paris, 24-26. April.
  22. Staropoli A. 1992 The French Comite National d ’Evaluation. W: Craft A. (ed.): Quality Assurance in Higher Education, Proceedings ofan International Conference. London: Falmer Press.
  23. Vroeijenstijn A.I., Acherman JA. 1990 Control Oriented Quality Assessment versus lmprovement Oriented. Quality Assessment. W: Goedegebuure L.C.J., Maassen P.A.M., Westerheijden D.F. (eds.): Peer Review and Performance Indicators. Quality Assessment in British and Dutch Higher Education. CHEPS; Utrecht: Lemma.
  24. Vroeijenstijn A l. 1992 External Quality Assessment, Sen/ant oftwo Masters? The Netheriands Perspective. W: Craft A. (ed.): Quality Assurance in Higher Education. Proceedings ofan International Conference. London: Falmer Press.
  25. Vroeijenstijn A l. 1993a Current Dutch Policy towards Assessing Quality in Higher Education. Keynote at the Fifth International Conference on Assessing Quality in Higher Education, Bonn, July 19-21, Utrecht: VSNU.
  26. Vroeijenstijn A.l. 1993b Some Ouestions (and Answers) about External Quality Assessment. Paper presented at the International High-Level Consultation on Policy Issues of Quality Assessment and Institutional Accreditation in Higher Education (Oradea, Romania, May 5-7).
  27. Vroeijenstijn A.l. 1993c Governments and Univeristy Opponents or Allies in Quality Assurance. Key-note at the SRHE-Annual Conference.
  28. Vroeijenstijn A.l. 1994 Improvement and Accountability, Navigating between Scylla and Charybdis. Guide for External Quality Assessment in Higher Education. London: Jessica Kingsley Publ.
  29. VSNU 1990 Guide to External Program Review. Utrecht: VSNU.