Abstract
The frequently remarked public distrust of ‘science’ is focused on science advice. On its present scale, such advice is a new sort of practice, for which the scientific community is not well prepared. The contributions of science advisors are deployed by those in the policy process, who have quite different agendas. Advice is more required now because of the knowledge economy, with the deep involvement of the State, and also the inevitability of ‘unintended consequences’. It also fosters a sophisticated public, who subject both advice and advisors to critical scrutiny. The welcome reforms in science advice have a variety of possible functions, and, without clarity about them and about the structural features of the problem, there is a danger that they will be frustrated.
References
Ahmed K. 2001 Airlines to Issue DVT Alert, „The Observer” , 1 August, s. 1.
Beck U. 1999 Risk Society - Towards a New Modernity, Sage, London.
EC 2000 European Commission: Conclusions to Conference „Science and Government in a Knowledge Society-The Challenge for Europe” , Brussels, 16-17 October 2000 (www.jrc.es/sci-gov).
EC 2001 a European Commission: Report o f the Working Group Democratising Expertse and Establishing Scientific Reference Systems (Group 1b). White Paper on Governance Work Area 1 - Broadening and Enriching the Public Debate on European Matters (www.europa.eu.int/comm/governance/areas/group2/report_en.pdf).
EC 2001b European Commission: European Governance. A White Paper (www.europa.eu.int/comm/governance/white_paper/index_en.htm).
Funtowicz S., Ravetz J. 1999 Post-normal Science - An Insight Now Maturing, „Future”, nr 31 (7), s. 641-646.
HSE 2001 Health and Safety Commission and Executive: Prioritising the Work o f the Health and Safety Commission and Executive (Discussion Document) (www.hse.gove.uk/discdocs/).
House of Lords ... 2000 House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology: Science and Society, „House of Lords Paper” , vol. 38, The Stationery Office, London.
IEGMP 2001 Independent Expert Group on Mobile Phones: The Stewart Report (www.iegmp.org.uk).
McCarthy M. 2001 Inquiry Launched into Camelford Poisoning, „The Independent”, 14 August, s. 1.
OST 2001 Office of Science and Technology: Code o f Practice for Scientific Acvisory Committees: Draft for Second Round Consultation (March), Department of Trade and Industry, London.
Russel B. 2001 Inquiry to Study Cancer Clusters at Power Stations, „The Independent”, 1 August.
Stirling A., Mayer S. 1999 Rethinking Risk, Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex, Brighton.