Technology and education, or the incoherent symbiosis of tradition and modernisty
PDF

Keywords

technology
education
teaching
e-teaching
media
multimedia
the Internet

How to Cite

Wobalis, M. (2018). Technology and education, or the incoherent symbiosis of tradition and modernisty. Polonistyka. Innowacje, (7), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.14746/pi.2018.7.7

Abstract

The article discusses the complex relationship between technology and its tools, education and its objectives. It is recognized that both areas are closely interwoven since the emergence of communication between people and the need to use tools for self-development (it is indicated that this phenomenon is not reserved exclusively for homo sapiens sapiens). The coexistence of both areas – education and technology is identified as crucial for the development of civilization, while raising the issue of their impassable incoherence resulting, inter alia, for other purposes (education retains, technology changes, education transfers information from the past to the present, technology transfers knowledge from the present to the future, etc.). All this makes the seemingly seeming relationship of technology and education as synergetic areas supporting civilization development. At the same time there is a relationship between technology and education manifesting itself in permanent cultural crisis between what is old and well known (defining education) and what is new and unpredictable (the support of technological development).

https://doi.org/10.14746/pi.2018.7.7
PDF

References

Bauman Zygmunt, 2010, Globalization: The Human Consequences, New York.

Bednarek Józef, 2006, Multimedia w kształceniu, Warszawa.

Briggs Asa, Burke Peter, 2009, A Social History of the Media: From Gutenberg to the Internet, Cambridge.

Burni David, Hoare Ben, DiConstanzo Joseph, Benstead Phil, 2009, Ptaki. Encyklopedia, Warszawa.

Chomsky Noam, 2006/1968, Language and Mind, Cambridge.

Debray Régis, 1991, Cours de la médiologie généralem, Paris.

Dijk Jan van, 1999, The Network Society: Social Aspects of New Media, London.

Eskarpit Robert, 1966, The Book Revolution, London.

Gulińska Hanna, 1997, Strategia multimedialnego kształcenia chemicznego, Poznań.

Koszko Marta, 2014, Charakterystyka wirtualnego środowiska komunikacyjnego na podstawie analizy zachowań werbalnych i niewerbalnych nauczycieli i uczniów w kontekście glottodydaktyki, [In]: I Konferencja ekolingwistyczna pt. „Motywy ekolingwistyczne – w stronę ekoglottodydaktyki (MOTEK), Puppel S. (red.), Poznań.

Książek-Szczepanikowa Aniela, 1996, Ekranowy czytelnik – wyzwanie dla polonisty, Szczecin.

Kulczycki Emanuel, Wendland Michał, (red.), 2012, Komunikologia. Teoria i praktyka komunikacji, Poznań.

Kwiatkowska-Ratajczak Maria, Mickiewicz i Edu-romy, 2003, [In]: Media i edukacja w globalizującym się świecie, Olsztyn.

McLuhan Marshall, 1962, Gutenberg Galaxy, The Making of Typographic Man, Toronto.

Prensky Mark, 2001, Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants, “On the Horizon”, nr 9(5).

Small Gary, Vorgan Gigi, 2008, iBrain: Surviving the Technological Alteration of the Modern Mind, New York.

Spitzer Manfred, 2012, Digitale Demenz: Wie wir uns und unsere Kinder um den Verstand bringen, Munich.

Vandendorpe Christian, 1999, Du papyrus à l’hypertexte, Montréal.

Wittgeinstein Ludwig, 1973, Philosophical Investigations, New York.

Wobalis Mirosław, 2010, E-rzeczywistość czy e-nierzeczywistość, „Polonistyka”, nr 11, s. 12-18.

Wobalis Mirosław, 2011, Multimedia w nauczaniu polonistycznym, Poznań.

Wobalis Mirosław, 2017, Nowe media i technologie cyfrowe w kształceniu polonistów, Poznań.

Zielinski Siegfried, 2008, Deep Time of the Media: Toward an Archeology of Hearing and Seeing by Technical Means, Cambridge.