Legal Protection of Property Rights in the Self-Regulating United States Local Recording System

Main Article Content

Charles Szypszak

Abstrakt

In all legal systems with private property, the government provides a mechanism for owners and lenders to make a public record of their rights. In most countries, the gov-ernment restricts access to this public record and allows entries into it only after a public official approves it. By contrast, no government entity in the United States regulates, confirms, or guarantees the typical real estate ownership transfer. How this works is not readily understood even within the United States, where owners and lenders rely on attorneys and other professionals to examine and understand the public record and to record instruments that protect their clients’ property rights. This article describes the laws and legal customs that underlie this self-regulating system, including how they dif-fer fundamentally from land registration in other countries, and the emerging challenges to its reliability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Jak cytować
Szypszak, C. (2019). Legal Protection of Property Rights in the Self-Regulating United States Local Recording System. Przegląd Prawniczy Uniwersytetu Im. Adama Mickiewicza, 9. https://doi.org/10.14746/ppuam.2019.9.01
Dział
Articles

Bibliografia

  1. Beale Jr. J., The Origin of the System of Recording Deeds in America, “The Green Bag”, 1907, no. 19.
  2. De Soto H., The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Ev-erywhere Else, New York, 2000.
  3. Eaton J.W., Eaton D. J., The American Title Insurance Industry: How a Cartel Fleeces the American Consumer, New York 2007.
  4. Garro A., Recordation of Interests in Land. in: ed. Athanassios N. Yiannopoulos, “Ency-clopedia of Comparative Law”, Vol. VI, Ch. 8, Tübingen 2004.
  5. J.V.B. II, Yes Virginia - There is a Torrens Act, “University of Richmond Law Review” 1975, no. 9.
  6. Johnson R. B., Basic Principles of Title Examination for the General Practitioner, “The Practical Lawyer”, 1961, no. 7.
  7. Olazábal A. M., Redefining Realtor Relationships and Responsibilities: The Failure of State Regulatory Responses,“Harvard Journal on Legislation”, 2003, no. 40.
  8. Powell R. R., Powell on Real Property, New York 2014.Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act §§ 105, 108, 201, 209 (2006).Roscoe E., Szypszak C., Privacy and Public Real Estate Records: Preserving Legacy System Reliability Against Modern Threats, “The Urban Lawyer” 2017, no. 49.
  9. Schick B. C., Plotkin I. H., Torrens in the United States, Lexington 1978.
  10. Schwartz v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company, 374 F. Supp. 564, 574 (E.D. Pa. 1974).
  11. Szypszak C., Local Government Registers of Deeds and the Enduring Reliance on Common Sense Judgment in a Technocratic Tide, “Real Estate Law Journal” 2015, no. 44.
  12. Szypszak C., North Carolina Guidebook for Registers of Deeds, “Chapel Hill, NC: UNC School of Government” 2016.
  13. Szypszak C., North Carolina’s Real Estate Recording Laws: The Ghost of 1885, “North Car-olina Central Law Journal”, 2006, no. 28.
  14. Szypszak C., Public Registries and Private Solutions: An Evolving American Real Estate Conveyance Regime, “Whittier Law Review” 2003, no. 24.
  15. Szypszak C., Real Estate Records, the Captive Public, and Opportunities for the Public Good.“Gonzaga Law Review” 2007, no. 43.