Abstract
The aim of the article is to review the contemporary debate on the concept of Respon-sibility to Protect. Numerous publications concerning R2P are the best illustration of the fact that it is a very topical subject. Analysing the doctrinal issues focusing on new challenges for contemporary international law the author focuse on a visible change in the international law paradigm, transformation of moral norm into legal one and the effective use of the instruments of R2P application.
References
Bellamy A. J., Global Politics and the Responsibility to Protect: From Words to Deeds, Rout-ledge, London–New York 2011.
Bloomfield A., Resisting the Responsibility to Protect, Norm Antipreneurs and the Politics of Resistance to Global Normative Change, eds. A. Bloomfield, S. V. Scott, Routledge, London–-New York 2017.
Breau S., The Responsibility to Protect in International Law An emerging paradigm shift, Routledge, London–New York 2016.
de la Rasilla del Moral I., The Unsolved Riddle of International Constitutionalism, “Inter-national Community Law Review”, 2010, vol. 12, no 1.
Domingo R., The New Global Law, Cambridge University Press, New York 2011.
Ercan G., Debating the Future of the ‘Responsibility to Protect’: The Evolution of a Moral Norm, Palgrave Macmillan, London 2016.
Evans G., The evolution of the Responsibility to Protect: from concept and principle to action-able norm, Theorising the Responsibility to Protect, eds. R. Thakur, W. Maley, Theorising the Responsibility to Protect, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2015.
Hakimi M., Toward a Legal Theory on the Responsibility to Protect, The Yale Journal of International Law 2014, vol. 39, no. 2.
Hamilton R. J., The Responsibility to Protect: From Document to doctrine – but what of implementation?, “Harvard Human Rights Law Journal”, 2006, vol. 19.
Hilpold P., The Responsibility to Protect (R2P): A new Paradigm of International Law?, Brill, Leiden–-Boston 2014.
Zajadło J., Konstytucjonalizacja prawa międzynarodowego, Leksykon prawa międzynarodowego publicznego. 100 podstawowych pojęć, eds. A. Przyborowska Klimc-zak, D. Pyć, C. H. Beck, Warszawa 2012.
Iyi J. M., Humanitarian Intervention and the AU-ECOWAS Intervention Treaties Under International Law. Towards a Theory of Regional Responsibility to Protect, Springer In-ternational Publishing, 2016.
Glenville L., Does R2P matter? Interpreting the impact of a norm, “Cooperation and Con-flict”, vol. 51, no. 2.
MacFarlane N., Thielking C. J., Weiss T. G., The Responsibility to Protect: is anyone inter-ested in humanitarian intervention?, “Third World Quarterly” 2004, vol. 25, no. 5.
Peters A., Humanity as A and Ω [Omega] of Sovereignty, “European Journal of Interna-tional Law” 2009, vol. 20, no 3.
Sung-han Kim, The End of Humanitarian Intervention?, Orbis A Journal of World Af-fairs, 2003.
Teitel R. G., Humanity’s Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford-New York 2011.The Responsibility to Protect and the Third Pillar.Legitimacy and Operationalizatio, eds.D. D. Fiott, J. Koops, Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.Theorising the Responsibility to Protect, eds. R. Thakur, W. Maley, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2015.
Trynidade A. A. C., International Law for Humankind, Brill, Boston–Leiden 2010.
Weiss T. G., The Sunset of Humanitarian Intervention? The Responsibility to Protect in the Unipolar Era, Security Dialog, 2004, vol. 35, no. 2.
Welsh J., Norm Contestation and the Responsibility to Protect, Global Responsibility to Protect, vol. 5, no. 4.
Wiśniewski A., Fragmentacja prawa międzynarodowego, Leksykon prawa międzynarodowego publicznego. 100 podstawowych pojęć, eds. A. Przyborowska Klimczak, D. Pyć, C. H. Beck, Warszawa 2012.
Zajadło J., Konstytucjonalizacja prawa międzynarodowego, “Państwo i Prawo”, 2011, vol. 3.
Zajadło J., Aksjologia Prawa Międzynarodowego a filozofia prawa(uwagi na marginesie doktryny Responsibility to Protect), Aksjologia współczesnego prawa międzynarodowego, ed. A. Wnukiewicz-Kozłowska, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, Wrocław 2011.