Abstract
The prohibition on enforced disappearances is one of the fundamental norms of con-temporary international law which is intended to protect the individual from state re-pression. Under certain circumstances, a violation of the prohibition is recognized as a crime of international law. There are no exceptions to the implementation of the norm. Since the prohibition is a treaty, States must expressly agree to be bound by it. Not all States have done this, but some have, including Argentina. Despite this, Roberto Agustín Yrusta disappeared. His enforced disappearance was preceded by numerous and elaborate forms of evil, cruel and humiliating treatment. This paper seeks to answer the question of how international law can ensure effective enforcement of the prohibition on enforced disappearance.
References
American Convention on Human Rights adopted on November 22 1969, UNTS, vol. 1144, p. 123.
CED, Concluding observations on the report submitted by Serbia under article 29, paragraph 1, of the International Convention for the Protection of all Persons from Enforced Disappearances, CED/C/SRB/CO/1, 16 March 2015.
CED, Concluding observations on the report submitted by Armenia under article 29, paragraph 1, of the International Convention for the Protection of all Persons from Enforced Disappearances, CED/C/ARM/CO/1, 13 March 2015.
CED, Concluding observations the report submitted by Kazakhstan under article 29, paragraph 1, of the International Convention for the Protection of all Persons from Enforced Disappearances, CED/C/KAZ/CO/1, 26 May 2016.
CED, Concluding observations on the report submitted by Argentina under article 29, paragraph 1, of the International Convention for the Protection of all Persons from Enforced Disappearances, CED/C/ARG/CO/1, 12 December 2013.
CED, Concluding observations on the report submitted by Germany under article 29, paragraph 1, of the International Convention for the Protection of all Persons from Enforced Disappearances, CED/C/GER/CO/1, 10 April 2014.
CED, Concluding observations on the report submitted by Netherlands under article 29, paragraph 1, of the International Convention for the Protection of all Persons from Enforced Disappearances, CED/C/NLD /CO/1, 10 April 2014.
CED, Concluding observations on the report submitted by Iraq under article 29, paragraph 1, of the International Convention for the Protection of all Persons from Enforced Disappearances, CED/C/IRQ /CO/1, 10 April 2014.
CED, Concluding observations on the report submitted by Iraq under article 29, paragraph 1, of the International Convention for the Protection of all Persons from Enforced Disappearances, CED/C/IRQ /CO/1, 10 April 2014.
CED, Concluding observations on the report submitted by Burkina Faso under article 29, paragraph 1, of the International Convention for the Protection of all Persons from Enforced Disappearances, CED/C/BFA /CO/1, 24 May 2016.
CED, Concluding observations the report submitted by Kazakhstan under article 29, paragraph 1, of the International Convention for the Protection of all Persons from Enforced Disappearances, CED/C/KAZ/CO/1, 26 May 2016.
CED, Concluding observations on the report submitted by Tunisia under article 29, paragraph 1, of the International Convention for the Protection of all Persons from Enforced Disappearances, CED/C/TUN/CO/1, 25 May 2016.
CED, Concluding observations on the report submitted by Montenegro under article 29, paragraph 1, of the International Convention for the Protection of all Persons from Enforced Disappearances, CED/C/MNE/CO/1, 16 October 2015.
CED, Concluding observations on the report submitted by Armenia under article 29, paragraph 1, of the International Convention for the Protection of all Persons from Enforced Disappearances, CED/C/ARM/CO/1, 13 March 2015.
CED, Concluding observations on the report submitted by Argentina under article 29, paragraph 1, of the International Convention for the Protection of all Persons from Enforced Disappearances, CED/C/ARG/CO/1, 12 December 2013.
CED, Concluding observations on the report submitted by Burkina Faso under article 29, paragraph 1, of the International Convention for the Protection of all Persons from Enforced Disappearances, CED/C/BFA /CO/1, 24 May 2016.
CED, Concluding observations on the report submitted by Senegal under article 29, paragraph 1, of the International Convention for the Protection of all Persons from Enforced Disappearances, CED/C/SEN/CO/1, 18 April 2017.
CED, Concluding observations on the report submitted by France under article 29, paragraph 1, of the International Convention for the Protection of all Persons from Enforced Disappearances, CED/C/FRA /CO/1, 8 May 2013.
Decision of 12 April 2016 of the CED no. 1/2013 in the case Yrusta v. Argentina, CED/ C/10/D/1/2013. General Assembly Resolution of 9 January 2003, UNTS, vol. 2375, p. 237, A/RES/57/199.
Decision of 12 April 2016 of the CED no. 1/2013 in the case Yrusta v. Argentina, CED/C/10/D/1/2013.
General Assembly Resolution of 10 December 1984, UNTS, vol. 1465, p. 85, A/RES39/46.
General comment of the Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances on the definition of enforced disappearances, A/HRC/7/2.
International Convention for the Protection of all Persons from Enforced Disappearance adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 20 December 2006, UNTS, vol. 2716, A/RES/61/177.
Report of the CED, General Assembly Official Records, 72 Session, Supplement no. 56, A/72/76.
Report of the CED, General Assembly Official Records, 74 Session, Supplement no. 56, A/74/56, para. 59.
<http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/SessionDetails1.aspx?Session ID=1102&Lang=en>.
<http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=22090 &LangID=E>.
<http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/TreatyBodyExternal/Treaty.aspx?CountryID=7 &Lang=en>.
<http://www.cidh.oas.org/basicos/english/Basic4.Amer.Conv.Ratif.htm>.