The International Legal Issue of Attribution of Conduct to a State – The Case Law of the International Courts and Tribunals
pdf.

Keywords

responsibility of States
attribution of conduct
de facto State organs
effective control test
overall control test

How to Cite

Stryjkowska, S. (2018). The International Legal Issue of Attribution of Conduct to a State – The Case Law of the International Courts and Tribunals. Przegląd Prawniczy Uniwersytetu Im. Adam Mickiewicza, 8. https://doi.org/10.14746/ppuam.2018.8.10

Abstract

The article aims to broaden the subject of the attribution of conduct to a State by pre-senting different grounds for attributing State responsibility. It surveys main the prin-ciples of attribution, which were affirmed in international judicial decisions and specifies circumstances which extend beyond the general rule under which States incur responsi-bility only for the conduct of its organs. The provisions of the Articles on the Responsi-bility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts constitute a primary point of reference of the research and are followed by examples of their practical application.

https://doi.org/10.14746/ppuam.2018.8.10
pdf.

References

Crawford J., Olleson S., The Nature and Forms of International Responsibility, International Law, ed. M. D. Evans, Oxford 2003.

Dixon M., Textbook on International Law, Oxford 2007.

Haddadi M., Khosroshahi H., Disguised Expulsion from Iran-United States Tribunal to the International Law Commission’s Draft on the Expulsion of Aliens, “International Journal of Academic Research in Public Policy and Governance” 2015, vol. 2, no. 1.

Leigh M., Yeager v. Islamic Republic of Iran. AWD 324–10199–1; AND Rankin v. Islamic Republic of Iran. AWD 326–10913–2, “The American Journal of International Law” 1988, Vol. 82, no. 2.

Nielsen E., State Responsibility for Terrorist Groups, “U. C. Davis Journal of International Law and Policy” 2010, vol. 17.

Wittich S., The International Law Commission’s Articles on the Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts Adopted on Second Reading, “Leiden Journal of International Law” 2002, vol. 15, issue 4.

Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, with commentaries, Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 2001, vol. II, Part Two, UN Doc. A/56/83 (2001).

Fourth report on State responsibility, by Roberto Ago, Special Rapporteur - The internationally wrongful act of the State, source of international responsibility (continued), Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 1972, vol. II, UN Doc. A/CN.4/264.

General Assembly Resolution, 28 January 2002, UN Doc. A/RES/56/83.

Report of the International Law Commission on the work of its fiftieth session, 20 April - 12 June and 27 July – 14 August 1998, Official Records of the General Assembly, Fifty-third session, Supplement no. 10, UN Doc. A/53/10.

Yearbook of the International Law Commission 1975, UN Doc. A/CN.4/SER.A/1975/ Add. 1.

ICJ, Case Concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Hercegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro), Judgement of 26 February 2007.

ICJ, Case Concerning Armed Activities on the Republic of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda), Judgement of 19 December 2005.

ICJ, Case Concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities In and Against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America), Judgement of 27 June 1986.

ICJ, Case Concerning United States Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Teheran (United States of America v. Iran), Judgement of 24 May 1980.

ICTY, Prosecutor v. Duško Tadić, Appeals Chamber Judgement of 15 July 1999, Case no. IT-94–1-A.

Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal, Kenneth P. Yeager v. Islamic Republic of Iran, 1987.