Trademark Registration in Bad Faith in the People’s Republic of China – Causes and Analysis of Provisions of Chinese law

Main Article Content

Oskar Ratajczak

Abstrakt

Bad faith trademark registrations in the People’s Republic of China are a longstanding issue. The PRC’s Trademark Law amendment of 2019 changed some articles relating to the bad faith trademark registration. The goal of this Article is to analyse the sources of this issue and examine the provisions of Chinese Trademark Law to understand how well foreign entities are protected against trademark squatters after the 2019 amendment. The causes of this issue were found in China’s unique economic position, the Chinese language, Chinese society, and Chinese culture. The analysis of the amended version of PRC’s Trademark Law found that, in fact, the Chinese legislator made some enhancements, but unfortunately it seems it is not going to be sufficient to protect the rightful foreign owners of trademarks in an effective way.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Jak cytować
Ratajczak, O. (2021). Trademark Registration in Bad Faith in the People’s Republic of China – Causes and Analysis of Provisions of Chinese law. Przegląd Prawniczy Uniwersytetu Im. Adama Mickiewicza, 13, 157-175. https://doi.org/10.14746/ppuam.2021.13.07
Dział
Articles

Bibliografia

  1. Bolton Kingsley, Bacon-Shone John, The Statistics of English across Asia in Bolton, Botha, Kirkpatrick, The Handbook of Asian Englishes, September 2020.
  2. Chang Sunny, Combating Trademark Squatting in China: New Developments in Chinese Trademark Law and Suggestions for the Future, “Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business” 2014, vol. 34:337.
  3. Chen Liang, Li Wanli, Language acquisition and regional innovation: Evidence from English proficiency in China, “Managerial and Decision Economics” May 2021.
  4. Chen Ming, Liu Xiaohai, Bad faith filings in the Chinese Trademark Law: evolution, status quo and improvements, “Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property” 2020, vol. 10 no. 3.
  5. Chow Daniel C.K., Trademark Squatting and the Limits of the Famous Marks Doctrine in China, “George Washington International Law Review” 2015, no. 47, 1.
  6. Hannas Wm. C., Asia’s Ortographic Dillema, “University of Hawai`i Press” 1997, accesed 01 November 2021, <http://www.pinyin.info/readings/texts/east_asian_languages.html>.
  7. Karlsson, Hanna, Trademark Protection for the Chinese Market – a study on Swedish retail companies established in China (Dissertation), accessed 31 October 2021. <http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-171035>.
  8. Liu Xindan Baker III Thomas A., Leopkey Rebecca, Examining the extent of trademark squatting of NBA athlete names in China, “European Sport Management Quarterly” April 2021.
  9. Martin Jessica, Two Steps Forward, One Step Back: A Need for China to Further Amend Its 2013 Trademark Law in Order to Prevent Trademark Squatting, “Brooklyn Journal of International Law” 2017, no. 42 (2).
  10. Martinsons Maris G., Transforming China, “Communications of the ACM” 2005, no. 48 (4).
  11. Matthews, Duncan, Intellectual Property Courts in China, “Queen Mary University of London,
  12. School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper” 2017, no. 254/2017.
  13. Sangsuvan Kitsuron, Trademark Squatting, “Wisconsin International Law Journal” 2013, vol. 31 no. 2.
  14. Stevenson Matthew K. A Summary of China’s Intellectual Property Reform from 2013 to 2019, “Willamette Journal of International Law & Dispute Resolution” 2020, no. 27 (1/2).
  15. World Intellectual Property Organization, WIPO Intellectual Property Handbook, 2004.
  16. Yang Chun and Canfei, He. Transformation of China’s ‘World Factory’: Production Relocation and Export Evolution of the Electronics Firms “Tijdschrift VoorEconomische En Sociale Geografie” 2017, no. 108, 5.
  17. Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works adopted 1886.
  18. Guidelines for the Trial of Trademark Right Granting and Verification Casesadopted 24 April 2019.
  19. Madrid Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Marks adopted 1891.
  20. Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property adopted 1883.
  21. Protocol Relating to the Madrid Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Marks adopted 1989.
  22. Provisions of the Supreme People’s Court on the Jurisdiction of Cases in Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangzhou Intellectual Property Courts adopted 27 October 2014.
  23. Provisions on the Configuration of Functions, Internal Institutions and Staffing of the State Administration for Market adopted 30 July 2018.
  24. Memorandum of understanding between the government of the People’s Republic of China and the government of the United States on the protectionof intellectual property, United States of America and People’s Republic of China, 1992.
  25. Trademark Law of People’s Republic of China adopted 23 August 1982.
  26. <https://www.reuters.com/article/us-tesla-motors-china-idUSKBN0G606420140806>.
  27. <https://tradingeconomics.com/china/wages>.
  28. <https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD?most_recent_value_desc=true&year_high_desc=true>.
  29. <https://data.wto.org/?idSavedQuery=467f03cf-2316–4273-b4e9-c15de67911ee>.