Natural law and the rights of nature – in search of more effective environmental protection
PDF

Keywords

natural law
rights of nature
human rights
bioculturalism
environmental law
environmental ethics

How to Cite

Kowalska, S. (2023). Natural law and the rights of nature – in search of more effective environmental protection. Przegląd Prawniczy Uniwersytetu Im. Adam Mickiewicza, 15, 273–292. https://doi.org/10.14746/ppuam.2023.15.13

Abstract

The paper discusses innovative legal regulations that may contribute to increasing standards ofenvironmental protection. In the face of increasing nature degradation and climate change, current protection measures are insufficient. The dysfunction of the political system, international institutionalisation, and existing legal regulations, result in the strengthening of the global economy instead of increasing the extent of activities aimedattheprotection of nature. It is argued that the concept of natural law, which focuses on the protection of human rights, is not the same as the rights of nature. However, the analysis of the origins and axiological and legal assumptions of boththese concepts allows us to formulate the conclusion that both can form a common ethical perspective needed in order to protect the community of life on Earth. The aim of the considerations is to discuss the concept of the rights of nature, which are the basis for shaping the new environmental ethics. Appealing to common axioms, the idea of the rights of nature favours overcoming the limitations resulting from property law and the currently dominant economic and utilitarian factors. The paper arguesthat the environmentally-profiled rights of nature can become an ally in environmental protection.

https://doi.org/10.14746/ppuam.2023.15.13
PDF

References

Altmann, Philipp. “Sumak Kawsay as an Element of Local Decolonization in Ecuador.” Latin American Research Review 52, no. 5. 2017: 749–759. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25222/larr.242

Athens, Allison Katherine. “An Indivisible and Living Whole: Do We Value Nature Enough to Grant It Personhood?” Ecology Law Quarterly 45, no. 2. 2018: 187–226.

Berros, María Valeria. “Defending Rivers: Vilcabamba in the South of Ecuador.” In Can Nature have Rights? Legal and Political Insights, edited by Tabios Hillebrecht, and María Valeria Berros. Munich, 2017: 37–44.

Charles, J. Daryl. “The Natural Law and Human Dignity: Reaffirming Ethical ‘First Things’.”Liberty University Law Review 2, no. 3. 2008: 607–647.

Clark, Cristy, Nia Emmanouil, John Page and Alessandro Pelizzon. “Can you Hear the Rivers Sing? Legal Personhood, Ontology, and the Nitty-Gritty of Governance.” Ecology Law Quarterly 45, no. 4. 2018: 787–844.

Coral-Guerrero, Carmen Amelia, Jorge Guardiola, Fernando García-Quero. “An Empirical Assessment of the Indigenous Sumak Kawsay (living well) the Importance of Nature and Relationships.” In Handbook on Wellbeing,

Happiness and the Environment, edited by David Maddison, Katrin Rehdanz, and Heinz Welsch. Cheltenham-Northampton, 2020: 385–398.

Cullinan, Cormac. “The Rule of Nature’s Law.” InRule of Law for Nature. New Dimensions and Ideas in Environmental Law, edited by Christina Voigt. Cambridge, 013: 94–108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107337961.008

Delgado Galarraga, Mario Alejandro. “Climate Change Law and the Rights of Nature: A Colombian Example through an International Perspective.” Revista Catalana de Dret Ambiental 13, no. 2. 2022: 1–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17345/rcda3292

Donziger, Steven R. “Rainforest Chernobyl: Litigating Indigenous Rights and the Environment in Latin America.” Human Rights Brief 11, no. 2. 2004: 1–4.

Gadkowski, Tadeusz. Podmiotowość prawnomiędzynarodowa organizacji międzynarodowych a ich zdolność traktatowa. Poznań, 2019.

George, Robert P. Prawo naturalne, Bóg i godność ludzka. Wykład im. Leona Petrażyckiego, Wydział Prawa i Administracji UW, 4 maja 2010, edited by Maciej Dybowski, translated by Alicja Legutko-Dybowska. Warszawa, 2010.

Houart, Carlota. “Rights of Nature as a Potential Framework for the Transformation of Modern Political Communities.” Janus.Net. E-Journal of International Relations 13, no. 1. 2022: 135–151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26619/1647-7251.13.1.9

Jones Moutrie, Marsha. “The Rights of Nature Movement in the United States: Community Organizing, Local Legislation, Court Challenges, Possible Lessons and Pathways.” Environmental and Earth Law Journal 10, no. 1. 2020: 5–66.

Kimerling, Judith. “Disregarding Environmental Law: Petroleum Development in Protected Natural Areas and Indigenous Homelands in the Ecuadorian Amazon.” Hastings International and Comparative Law Review 14, no. 4. 1991: 849–903.

Kimerling, Judith. “Habitat as Human Rights: Indigenous Huaorani in the Amazon Rainforest, Oil and Ome Yasuní.” Vermont Law Review 40, no. 3. 2016: 445–524.

Kowalska, Samanta. Międzynarodowe prawo roślin. Warszawa, 2023.

Magallanes, Catherine J. Iorns. “Nature as an Ancestor: Two Examples of Legal Personality for Nature in New Zealand.” VertigO 15, Special Issue. 2015: 1–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/vertigo.16199

McConnell, Donald R. “The Nature in Natural Law.” Liberty University Law Review 2, no 3. 2008: 797–846.

Myers, Norman. “Threatened Biotas: “Hot Spots” in Tropical Forests.”The Environmentalist 8, no. 3. 1988: 187–208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02240252

Orbik, Zbigniew. “Human Rights in the Light of the Concepts of Natural Law.” Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology. Organization and Management Series, no. 140. 2019: 275–284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2019.140.22

Pain, Nicola, and Rachel Pepper. “Can Personhood Protect the Environment? Affording Legal Rights to Nature.” Fordham International Law Journal 45, no. 2, 2021: 315–377.

Pastor, Ginés Haro, Georgina Donati, and Troth Wells. Yasuní Green Gold. The Amazon Fight to keep Oil Underground. Oxford, 2008.

Piechowiak, Marek. Filozofia praw człowieka. Prawa człowieka w świetle ich międzynarodowej ochrony. Lublin, 1999.

Radcliffe, Sarah A. “Development for a Postneoliberal Era? Sumak Kawsay, Living Well and the Limits to Decolonisation in Ecuador.” Geoforum 43, no. 2. 2012: 240–249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.09.003

Redelbach, Andrzej. Natura praw człowieka. Strasburskie standardy ich ochrony. Toruń, 2001.

Roncucci, Regine. Rights of Nature and the Pursuit of Environmental Justice in the Atrato Case. Wageningen, 2019.

Sidi Diallo,Boubacar. “African Legal Instruments as Regional Tools of Harmonization of International Environmental Law.” Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review 14. 2022: 87–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ppuam.2022.14.04

Stone, Christopher D. “Should Trees have Standing? – Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects.” Shoutern California Law Review 45. 1972: 450–501.

Swing, Kelly, Jaime Chaves, Stella de la Torre, Luis Sempértegui, Alex Hearn, Andrea Encalada, Esteban Suárez, and Gonzalo Rivas. “Outcomes of Ecuador’s Rights of Nature for Nature’s Sake.” Advances in Environmental and Engineering Research 3, no. 3. 2022: 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21926/aeer.2203035

Tokarczyk, Roman. Historia filozofii prawa w retrospektywie prawa natury. Bydgoszcz, 1999.

Urbański, Wojciech. Zasadnicze prawa natury. Lwów, 1867.

Waitangi Tribunal. The Whanganui River Report. Wellington, 1999.

Weinreb, Lloyd L. Natural Law and Justice. Massachusetts, 1987.

World Economic Forum. The Global Risks Report 2023. Insight Report. Geneva, 2023.

World Wildlife Fund. Living Planet Report 2022. Building a Nature – Positive Society. Gland, 2022.

Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador, National Assembly, Legislative and Oversight Committee, Publisher in the Official Register October 20, 2008.

Corte Suprema de Justicia, STC4360–2018, Radicación n.° 11001-22-03-000-2018-00319-01, Bogotá, cinco (5) de abril de dos mil dieciocho (2018).

Ley de Derechos de la Madre Tierra (Ley Nº 071), Ley de 21 de diciembre de 2010.

Judgment of Constitutional Court of Colombia of 10 November 2016, Center for Social Justice Studies et al. v. Presidency of the Republic et al., T-622/16, The Atrato River Case.

Judgment of High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital of 20 March 2017,Mohammad Salim v. State of Uttarakhand & Others, Writ Petition (PIL) No. 126 of 2014.

Property in Wildlife, art. 2(1), Wildlife Act [RSBC 1996] Chapter 488, as amended. Date of original text: 23 July 1982.

Stillheart Declaration on Rights of Nature and the Economics of the Biosphere, Woodside, March 3, 2014.

Te Awa Tupua (Whanganui River Claims Settlement) Act 2017, Public Act 2017, No. 7, 20 March 2017.

The Earth Charter launched on 29 June 2000.

Universal Declaration of the Rights of Mother Earth, April 22, 2010. World People’s Conference on Climate Change and the Rights of Mother Earth, Cochabamba, Bolivia.