Keywords
judicial independence
EU law
national autonomy
Poland
Article 2 TEU
constitutional identity
European Court of Justice
judicial reform
How to Cite
Abstract
This article examines the evolving tension between national autonomy and the European Union’s common concept of the rule of law, with a particular focus on judicial independence. While Article 2 TEU frames the rule of law as a value common to all Member States, recent jurisprudence— especially involving Poland—has exposed significant divergences between national and EU-level interpretations. The independence of the judiciary has become a key issue, raising questions about the autonomy Member States have when changing their justice systems and the limits of EU intervention. The article analyses how the EU defines and enforces the rule of law and whether a genuinely “common” understanding exists. In this context, the Polish case illustrates the legal and institutional difficulties involved in restoring the rule of law, highlighting the complex interplay between EU legal obligations and national constitutional identity.
References
Azoulai, Loic, ed. The Question of Competence in the European Union. Oxford University Press, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198705222.001.0001
Ballester, Rodrigo, Damille Devenyi, Jerzy Kwaśniewski, Jarosław Lindenberg, Zbigniew Przybyłowski. The Great Reset: Restoring Member State Sovereignty in the European Union; A Two Scenario Proposal Through Institutional Reform for a New EU from Mathias Corvinus Collegium And Ordo Iuris Institute. Academic Publishing House of the Ordo Iuris Institute for Legal Culture and Mathias Corvinus Collegium, 2025.
Boekestein, Tom L. “Making Do With What We Have: On the Interpretation and Enforcement of the EU’s Founding Values.” German Law Journal 23, no. 4 (2022): 431–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2022.33
von Bogdandy, Armin, and Jürgen Bast, eds., Principles of European Constitutional Law, 2nd ed. Hart Publishing, 2009.
von Bogdandy, Armin, and Luke D. Spieker. “Countering the Judicial Silencing of Critics: Article 2 TEU Values, Reverse Solange, and the Responsibilities of National Judges.” European Constitutional Law Review 15, no. 3 (2019): 391–426. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019619000324
Bonelli, Matteo, and Monica Claes. “Judicial Serendipity: How Portuguese Judges Came to the Rescue of the Polish Judiciary; ECJ 27 February 2018, Case C-64/16, Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses.” European Constitutional Law Review 14, no. 3 (2018): 622–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019618000330
Chesterman, Simon. “An International Rule of Law?” American Journal of Comparative Law 56, no. 2 (2008): 331–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5131/ajcl.2007.0009
Claes, Monica, and Jan-Herman Reestman. “The Protection of National Constitutional Identity and the Limits of European Integration at the Occasion of the Gauweiler Case.” German Law Journal 16, no. 4 (2015): 917–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200019957
Dobbs, Mary. “Sovereignty, Article 4(2) TEU and the Respect of National Identities: Swinging the Balance of Power in Favour of the Member States?” Yearbook of European Law 33, no. 1 (2014): 298–334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/yel/yeu024
Dumbravă, Horatius. “The Effects of Constitutional Court Judgments in the Context of EU Integration: The Case of Romania as an EU Member State.” ERA Forum 25, 2024: 61–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-024-00794-9
Fasone, Cristina, Adriano Dirri, and Ylenia Guerra, eds. EU Rule of Law Procedures at the Test Bench: Managing Dissensus in the European Constitutional Landscape. Palgrave Macmillan, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60008-1
Fassbender, Bardo. “Are the EU Member States Still Sovereign States?” The
Perspective of International Law. European Papers 8, no. 3 (2023): 1629–43.
Filipek, Paweł. “Only a Court Established by Law Can Be an Independent Court: The ECJ’s Independence Test as an Incomplete Tool to Assess the Lawfulness of Domestic Courts.” VerfBlog, published 23 January 2020. https://verfassungsblog.de/only-a-court-established-by-law-can-be-an-independent-court/.
Gallie, W. B. “Essentially Contested Concepts.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56, 1956: 167–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/56.1.167
Gárdos-Orosz, Fruzsina. “The Reference to Constitutional Traditions in Populist Constitutionalism—The Case of Hungary.” Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies 61, no. 1 (2021): 23–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2052.2021.00298
Grimm, Dieter. The Constitution of European Democracy. Oxford University Press, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198805120.001.0001
Hayek, Friedrich A. The Constitution of Liberty. University of Chicago Press, 1960.
Jaraczewski, Jakub. “Polexit or Judicial Dialogue?: CJEU and Polish Constitutional Tribunal in July 2021.” VerfBlog, published 19 July 2021. https://verfassungsblog.de/polexit-or-judicial-dialogue/.
Komárek, Jan. “The Place of Constitutional Courts in the EU.” European Constitutional Law Review 9, no. 3 (2013): 420–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S157401961200123X
Kochenov, Dimitry. “EU Law Without the Rule of Law: Is the Veneration of Autonomy Worth It?” Yearbook of European Law 34, no. 1 (2015): 74–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/yel/yev009
Kochenov, Dimitry. “On Policing Article 2 TEU Compliance—Reverse Solange and Systemic Infringements Analyzed.” Polish Yearbook of International Law 33, 2013: 145–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2486042
Krajewski, Michał, and Michał Ziółkowski. “EU Judicial Independence Decentralized: A.K.” Common Market Law Review 57, no. 4 (2020): 1107–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2020717
Krogel, Maciej. “The Closure of the Article 7(1) TEU Procedure Against Poland: The Weight of Intentions and the Risk to Common Values in the Twilight of Illiberalism.” Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 32, no. 3 (2025): 315–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X251338198
Krygier, Martin Evald John. “Rule of Law (and Rechtsstaat).” UNSW Law Research Paper, no. 52 (2013). https://ssrn.com/abstract=2311874.
Lenaerts, Koen. “The Autonomy of European Union Law.” Post di Aisdue, no. 1 (2019). https://www.aisdue.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/001C_Lenaerts.pdf.
Müller, Jan-Werner. “Should the EU Protect Democracy and the Rule of Law inside Member States?” European Law Journal 21, no. 2 (2015): 141–62, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12124
O’Neill, Ruairi. “Defending Judicial Independence in Court: A Subjective Right to Independence in EU Law.” Liverpool Law Review 46, 2025: 65–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-024-09376-8
Naumann, Paul, and Ewelina Lipska. “Two Proposals to Re-Establish the Rule of Law.” Heinrich Böll Stiftung, published 21 March 2025. https://pl.boell.org/en/2025/03/21/two-proposals-re-establish-rule-law.
Palombella, Gianluigi. “Principles and Disagreements in International Law (with a View from Dworkin’s Legal Theory).” In General Principles of Law—The Role of the Judiciary, edited by Laura Pineschi. Springer Cham, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19180-5_1
Palombella, Gianluigi. “The Rule of Law and Its Core.” In Relocating the Rule of Law, edited by Gianluigi Palombella and Neil Walker. Hart Publishing, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472564634.ch-002
Pech, Laurent. Protecting Polish judges from Poland’s Disciplinary “Star Chamber”: Commission v Poland. Case C-791/19 R, Order of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 April 2020, EU:C:2020:277. SSRN, 2020. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3683683. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3683683
Pech, Laurent. “The Rule of Law as a Well-Established and Well-Defined Principle of EU Law.” Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 14, 2022: 107–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-022-00176-8
Pech, Laurent. “‘A Union Founded on the Rule of Law’: Meaning and Reality of the Rule of Law as a Constitutional Principle of EU Law.” European Constitutional Law Review 6, no. 3 (2010): 359–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019610300034
Pech, Laurent, Joelle Grogan, Petra Bárd et al. Meaning and Scope of the EU Rule of Law: Work Package 7—Deliverable 2. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4100123
Pech, Laurent, and Dimitry Kochenov. Respect for the Rule of Law in the Case Law of the European Court of Justice. Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies, 2021. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3850308.
Pech, Laurent, and Sébastien Platon. “Judicial Independence Under Threat: The Court of Justice to the Rescue in the ASJP Case.” Common Market Law Review 55, no. 6 (2018): 1827–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2018146
Raz, Joseph. “The Rule of Law and Its Virtue.” In The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. Clarendon Press, 1979. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198253457.001.0001
Sadurski, Wojciech. “Transitional Constitutionalism versus the Rule of Law?” Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 8, no. 2 (2016): 337–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-016-0029-7
Scheppele, Kim Lane. “EU Commission v. Hungary: The Case for the ‘Systemic Infringement Action’.” VerfBlog, published 22 November 2013. https://verfassungsblog.de/eu-commission-v-hungary-the-case-for-the-systemic-infringement-action/.
Schroeder, Werner. “The Rule of Law as a Constitutional Mandate for the EU.” Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 15, 2022: 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-022-00185-7
Shore, Chris. “The Cultural Policies of the European Union and Cultural Diversity.” Council of Europe Research Position Paper, no. 3 (2003), available at http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/cultureheritage/Completed/Diversity/EN_Diversity_Bennett.pdf.
Skóra, Maria. “Poland’s Polarised Presidency.” VerfBlog, 22 May 2025. https://verfassungsblog.de/polands-polarised-presidency/, DOI: https://doi.org/10.59704/c2d7d069b2014393
Spieker, L.D. “Defending Union Values in Judicial Proceedings: On How to Turn Article 2 TEU into a Judicially Applicable Provision.” In Defending Checks and Balances in EU Member States, edited by Armin von Bogdandy, Piotr Bogdanowicz, Iris Canor, Christoph Grabenwarter, Maciej Taborowski, Matthias Schmidt. Springer, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-62317-6_10
Sur, Emmanuel. “Od nejistého k implicitnímu (Význam principu právního státu a jeho ochrana ve Smlouvě o Evropské unii).” In Evropský delikt. Porušení základních hodnot Evropské unie členským státem a unijní sankční mechanismus, edited by Luboš Tichý. Univerzita Karlova, 2017.
Szwed, Marcin. “Rebuilding the Rule of Law: Three Guiding Principles.” VerfBlog, published 29 April 2024. https://verfassungsblog.de/rebuildingthe-rule-of-law/. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59704/794ecd417ad8ac53
Szwed, Marcin. “To Void or Not To Void: On the Legal Effect of the Constitutional Tribunal’s Rulings.” VerfBlog. Last modified 13 October 2023. https://verfassungsblog.de/to-void-or-not-to-void/. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59704/2619f6f8193204f1
Tamanaha, Brian Z. On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory. Cambridge University Press, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812378
van Zyl Smit, Jan. “After Poland’s Attempted Purge of ‘Communist-era’ Judges, Do We Need New International Standards for Post-authoritarian Countries Reforming Their Judiciary? (Part I).” United Kingdom Constitutional Law Association, published 15 January 2019. https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2019/01/15/jan-van-zyl-smit-after-polands-attempted-purge-of-communist-era-judges-do-we-need-new-international-standards-for-post-authoritarian-countries-reforming-their-judiciary.
Waldron, Jeremy. “The Rule of Law.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman. Stanford University, Fall 2023 Edition. Published 22 June 2016, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2023/entries/rule-of-law/.
Watt, Nicholas. “Nappy Mirth Day to EU.” Guardian, published 8 November 2006. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2006/nov/08/eu.worlddispatch.
de Witte, Barbara. “Article 4(2) TEU as a Protection of Institutional Diversity of the Member States.” European Public Law 27, no. 3 (2021): 559–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/EURO2021026
Wójcik, Anna. Restoring the Rule of Law in Poland: An Assessment of the New Government’s Progress. German Marshall Fund of the United States, 2024.
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Karolína Godál
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.