European Union Policy towards the Pacific Island States
PDF (Język Polski)


European Union
foreign policy
European Union foreign policy
South Pacific
Pacific island

How to Cite

Siekiera, J. (2015). European Union Policy towards the Pacific Island States. Przegląd Prawniczy Uniwersytetu Im. Adam Mickiewicza, 5, 163–170.


The article concerns the idea as well as the form of international cooperation between states and international organizations, illustrated by the example of the relationship between the European Union and the Pacific region. There is some useful literature on the subject but this needs be to completed. The influences of the world’s leaders collide on the Pacific Ocean, which gives this area primacy in geopolitical domination, slowly downgrading the Atlantic Community. The main purpose of the paper is, therefore, to research the possibilities and methods of legal and extrajudicial cooperation between two continents which are very distant from each other. This work underlines the difference between official policy, presented by the regional intergovernmental organizations, and the individual policies of member states, who are not tied down by Brussels politics and may maintain their own foreign relations.
PDF (Język Polski)


Siekiera J., International Cooperation among States in the South Pacific Region, in: “Folia Iuridica Wratislaviensis” vol. 2, no. 2/2013, University of Wrocław, Wrocław 2013.

Brendan Nelson: “Five of the world’s economic powerhouses are in the Asia Pacific – US, China, India, Japan and the Republic of Korea” in: Europe and the Asia Pacific, in “Policy Briefs” No. 010/2012.

Terry S., Where the wave of the future will crest? in: “The Christian Science Monitor”, 28.09.1982.

Clinton H., America’s Pacific Century, in: “Foreign Policy” 11.11.2011.

Rumley D., The Geopolitics of Asia- Pacific Regionalism in the 21st Century, in: “The Otemon Journal of Australian Studies” 2005, vol. 31.

Soni N. and Brien D., Beyond Fish and Coconuts: Will the New EU Trade Policy Support Development in the Pacific Islands? essay issued by the Overseas Development Institute in 2012

Aid, Trade, Charade? Discussion paper No. 14 by the Pacific Institute of Public Policy, June 2010.

Sutor J., Leksykon dyplomatyczny, Warsaw 2010.

Jędrusik M., Wyspy tropikalne; W poszukiwaniu dobrobytu, Warsaw 2005.

Parello-Plesner J., Grading Europe in the Asia-Pacific: European Foreign Policy Scorecard 2013, in: “Asia Pacific Bulletin, No 203, 28.02.2013.

Takkula H., EU relations with Asia-Pacific partners ‘increasingly important’, “Parliament Magazine” 4.11.2013.

Kirchner C., Goals of Antitrust and Competition Law Revisited, [in:] ed. Schmidtchen D. et al., The More Economic Approach to European Competition Law, 2007.

Czapracka K., Aksjologiczne ramy unijnego prawa konkurencji, [in:] ed. Nowak-Far A., Konstytucja Gospodarcza Unii Europejskiej. Aksjologia, 2010.

Italianer A., The Interplay Between Law and Economics, Speech at Charles River Associates Annual Conference, Brussels, 8 December 2010.

Stefaniuk M., Swora M., Richarda Allena Posnera ekonomiczna analiza prawa i poglądy na nową gospodarkę, [in:] Konkurencja w gospodarce współczesnej, ed. Banasiński C., Stawicki E., 2007.

Jones & B.Sufrin A., EU Competition Law, Text, Cases and Materials, 2011.

Voigt S., More Economic Does Not Necessarily Mean ‘Better’ – Perils and Pitfalls of the More Economic Approach as recommended by the European Commission [in:] The More Economic Approach to European Competition Law, ed. Schmidtchen D. et al., 2007.

Christiansen A., The ‘more economic approach’ in EU merger control, 7 CESifo Forum, 2006.

Craig P., De Búrca G., EU Law. Text, Cases and Materials, 2011.

Broberg M. P., The European Commission’s Jurisdiction to Scrutinise Mergers, 2003.

Karl M., Der Zusammenschlußbegriff in der Europäischen Fusionskontrollverordnung. Eine Untersuchung unter Berücksichtigung der Entscheidungspraxis der Kommission der Europäischen Gemeinschaften, 1996.

Barcz J. et al. , Prawo Gospodarcze Unii Europejskiej, 2011.

Röller L., de la Mano M., The Impact of the New Substantive Test in European Merger Control, 2 (1) European Competition Journal, 2006.

Piontek E., Nowe tendencje w prawiekonkurencji UE, 2008.

Monti M., EU Competition Policy, Speech at the Fordham annual conference on international antitrust law and policy, New York, 31 October 2002.

Fingleton J., Does Collective Dominance Provide Suitable Housing for All Anti-Competitive Oligopolistic Mergers?, [in] EC Merger Control: A Major Reform in Progress, ed. Drauz G., Reynolds M. 2002.

Böge U., Müller E., From the Market Dominance Test to the SLC Test: Are There Any Reasons for a Change, 23 ECLR, 2002.

Monti M., Merger Control in the European Union: A Radical Reform, Speech at the European Commission/IBA conference on EU merger control, Brussels, 7 November 2002.

Witt A. C., From Airtours to Ryanair: Is the more economic approach to EU merger law really about more economics? 49 CMLR, 2012.

Lindsay A., The EC Merger Regulation: Substantive Issues, 2003.

Verloop P., Landes V., Merger Control in Europe,2003.

Russo F. et al., European Commission Decisions on Competition. Economic Perspectives on Landmark Antitrust and Merger Cases, 2010.

Lowe P., Director-General of DG Energy and former Director-General of DG Competition, described cartels as ‘arguably the most harmful type of competition infringement’; v. Lowe P., Competition Policy and the Global Economic Crisis, “Competition Policy International”, 2009.

Kokkoris I., Do Merger Simulation and Critical Loss Analysis Differ Under the SLC and Dominance Test?, 27 (5) ECLR, 2006.

Schmidt A., Voigt S., Der „moreeconomicapproach“ in der Missbrauchsaufsicht: Einige kritische Anmerkungen zu den Vorschlägen der Generaldirektion Wettbewerb, 11 Wirtschaft und Wettbewerb, 2006.

Böge U., Reform derEuropäischen Fusionskontrolle, 2 Wirtschaft und Wettbewerb, 2004.

Neven D. J., Competition economics and antitrust in Europe, 21 (48) Economic Policy, CEPR & CES & MSH, 2006.