Abstrakt
This presented study is an integrative review of 101 journal articles selected from the Web of Science Social Science Citation Index database in the field of economics and political science, focusing on the determinants of the heterogeneity of labour market institutions, both spatial and temporal. It aims to identify research gaps in the economics literature by comparing it with another social science discipline. The main limitation is found within the mainstream economics, which indicates that labour market institutions are an optimal response of a representative voter to market failures, or the preferred way (by that voter) to redistribute income. The analysis focuses on the spatial heterogeneity of institutions (between countries), with minimal consideration of their temporal evolution. In contrast, political science strongly focuses on selected cases of institutional change, incorporating the preferences and actions of not only voters but also of trade unions, employers’ associations, and political parties. The study concludes that allowing the rational agent to have an impact on the institutional choice through both voting and interest groups would enable mainstream economists to better explain labour market reforms without compromising the discipline’s defining features.
Bibliografia
Afonso, A., & Papadopoulos, Y. (2015). How the populist radical right transformed Swiss welfare politics: From compromises to polarization. Swiss Political Science Review, 21(4), 617–635. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12182
Alesina, A., Algan, Y., Cahuc, P., & Giuliano, P. (2015). Family values and the regulation of labor. Journal of the European Economic Association, 13(4), 599–630. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jeea.12121
Algan, Y., & Cahuc, P. (2009). Civic Virtue and Labor Market Institutions. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 1(1), 111–145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.1.1.111
Allan, J. P., & Scruggs, L. (2004). Political partisanship and welfare state reform in advanced industrial societies. American Journal of Political Science, 48(3), 496–512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00083.x
Armingeon, K. (2007). Active labour market policy, international organizations and domestic politics. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(6), 905–932. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760701497923
Anderson, K. M. (2001). The politics of retrenchment in a social democratic welfare state: Reform of Swedish pensions and unemployment insurance. Comparative Political Studies, 34(9), 1063–1091. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414001034009005
Arpaia, A., & Mourre, G. (2009). Institutions and performance in European labour markets: Taking a fresh look at evidence. European Economy. Economic Papers, No. 391.
Becher, M. (2009). Constraining ministerial power: The impact of veto players on labor market reforms in industrial democracies, 1973–2000. Comparative Political Studies, 43(1), 33–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009341716
Becker, G. S. (1983). A theory of competition among pressure groups for political influence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98(3), 371–400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1886017
Berg, J. (Ed.). (2015). Labour markets, institutions and inequality: Building just societies in the 21st century. Edward Elgar; International Labour Office. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784712105
Bittschi, B., & Wigger, B. U. (2023). Who wants (them) to work longer? Economics Letters, 227, 111122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2023.111122
Blanchard, O., & Wolfers, J. (2000). The role of shocks and institutions in the rise of European unemployment: The aggregate evidence. The Economic Journal, 110(462), 1–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00518
Boeri, T. (2010). Institutional reforms and dualism in European labor markets. In D. Card & O. Ashenfelter (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (Vol. 4B, pp. 1173–1236). North Holland. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(11)02411-7
Boeri, T., Börsch-Supan, A., Tabellini, G., Moene, K. O., & Lockwood, B. (2001). Would you like to shrink the welfare state? A survey of European citizens. Economic Policy, 16(32), 9–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0327.00069
Boeri, T., Conde-Ruiz, J. I., & Galasso, V. (2012). The political economy of flexicurity. Journal of the European Economic Association, 10(4), 684–715. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-4774.2012.01065.x
Boeri, T., & Jimeno, J. F. (2016). Learning from the Great Divergence in unemployment in Europe during the crisis. Labour Economics, 41, 32–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2016.05.022
Boeri, T., & Van Ours, J. (2021). The economics of imperfect labor markets (3rd ed.). Princeton University Press.
Bonoli, G. (2010). The political economy of active labor-market policy. Politics & Society, 38(4), 435–457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329210381235
Boulhol, H. (2009). Do capital market and trade liberalization trigger labor market deregulation? Journal of International Economics, 77(2), 223–233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2008.12.001
Bridgen, P., & Meyer, T. (2009). The politics of occupational pension reform in Britain and the Netherlands: The power of market discipline in liberal and corporatist regimes. West European Politics, 32(3), 586–610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380902779105
Brinkman, J., Coen-Pirani, D., & Sieg, H. (2018). The political economy of municipal pension funding. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 10(3), 215–246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.20160400
Casamatta, G., Cremer, H., & Pestieau, P. (2005). Voting on pensions with endogenous retirement age. International Tax and Public Finance, 12(1), 7–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-005-6392-2
Ciani, E., Delavande, A., Etheridge, B., & Francesconi, M. (2023). Policy uncertainty and information flows: Evidence from pension reform expectations. The Economic Journal, 133(649), 98–129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueac050
Cioffi, J. W., & Dubin, K. A. (2016). Commandeering crisis: Partisan labor repression in Spain under the guise of economic reform. Politics & Society, 44(3), 423–453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329216656840
Clarivate. (2024). Web of Science: Social Sciences Citation Index. Retrieved on 26 March 2024, from https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/solutions/webofscience-ssci/
Clegg, D., Durazzi, N., Heins, E., & Robertson, E. (2023). Policy, power and pandemic: varieties of job and income protection responses to Covid-19 in Western Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 31(11), 3515–3538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2242907
Cox, J. C., & Oaxaca, R. L. (1982). The political economy of minimum wage legislation. Economic Inquiry, 20(4), 533–555. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1982.tb00365.x
Cremer, H., & Pestieau, P. (2000). Reforming our pension system: Is it a demographic, financial or political problem? European Economic Review, 44(4), 974–983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(99)00054-9
Cronin, M. A., & George, E. (2020). The why and how of the integrative review. Organizational Research Methods, 26(1), 168–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120935507
Dahlström, C., Lindvall, J., & Rothstein, B. (2013). Corruption, bureaucratic failure and social policy priorities. Political Studies, 61(3), 523–542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00998.x
Dargent Bocanegra, E. (2022). The limits of neoliberal policy feedback: Private pension fund reforms in Peru (2014–2021). Journal of Politics in Latin America, 14(2), 190–210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1866802X221107147
Davidsson, J. B., & Marx, P. (2013). Losing the issue, losing the vote: Issue competition and the reform of unemployment insurance in Germany and Sweden. Political Studies, 61(3), 505–522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00997.x
De la Porte, C., Dagnis Jensen, M., & Kvist, J. (2023). Going Nordic – Can the Nordic model tackle grand challenges and be a beacon to follow? Regulation & Governance, 17(3), 595–607. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12494
Dixon, A. D., & Sorsa, V.-P. (2009). Institutional change and the financialisation of pensions in Europe. Competition & Change, 13(4), 347–367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/102452909X12506915718111
Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. J. (2002). The determination of unemployment benefits. Journal of Labor Economics, 20(2), 404–434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/338690
DiSalvo, D., & Kucik, J. (2018). Unions, parties, and the politics of state government legacy cost. Policy Studies Journal, 46(3), 573–597. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12232
Dooley, N. (2023). The politics of structural reform in Ireland: Dominant growth coalitions, domestic business elites, and internal devaluation. Competition & Change, 10245294231194694. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294231194694
Duval, R., & Furceri, D. (2018). The effects of labor and product market reforms: The role of macroeconomic conditions and policies. IMF Economic Review, 66(1), 31–69. Ebbinghaus, B. (2019). Multipillarisation remodelled: The role of interest organizations in British and German pension reforms. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(4), 521–539. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1574875
Elmelund-Præstekær, C., & Emmenegger, P. (2013). Strategic re-framing as a vote winner: Why vote-seeking governments pursue unpopular reforms. Scandinavian Political Studies, 36(1), 23–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2012.00295.x
Etchemendy, S. (2001). Constructing reform coalitions: The politics of compensations in Argentina’s economic liberalization. Latin American Politics and Society, 43(3), 1–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2001.tb00177.x
Fleckenstein, T., Saunders, A. M., & Seeleib-Kaiser, M. (2011). The dual transformation of social protection and human capital: Comparing Britain and Germany. Comparative Political Studies, 44(12), 1622–1650. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414011407473
Fondazione Rodolfo Debenedetti. (2010). fRDB-IZA Social Reforms Database. Retrieved on 11 September 2023, from https://www.frdb.org/en/dati/frdb-iza-social-reforms-database/
Ford, M., Gillan, M., & Ward, K. (2021). Authoritarian innovations in labor governance: The case of Cambodia. Governance, 34(4), 1255–1271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12559
Gabriel, O. W., & Trüdinger, E.-M. (2011). Embellishing welfare state reforms? Political trust and the support for welfare state reforms in Germany. German Politics, 20(2), 273–292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2011.582098
Gabszewicz, J. J., & van Ypersele, T. (1996). Social protection and political competition. Journal of Public Economics, 61(2), 193–208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(95)01542-6
Gaston, N., & Rajaguru, G. (2008). The rise (and fall) of labour market programmes: Domestic vs. global factors. Oxford Economic Papers, 60(4), 619–648. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpn002
Gilardi, F. (2010). Who learns from what in policy diffusion processes? American Journal of Political Science, 54(3), 650–666. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00452.x
Golosov, M., & Iovino, L. (2021). Social insurance, information revelation, and lack of commitment. Journal of Political Economy, 129(9), 2629–2665. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/715022
Grodzicki, M. J., & Możdżeń, M. (2021). Central and Eastern European economies in a Goldilocks age: A model of labor market institutional choice. Economic Modelling, 104, 105626. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2021.105626
Hassler, J., Rodríguez Mora, J. V, Storesletten, K., & Zilibotti, F. (2005). A positive theory of geographic mobility and social insurance. International Economic Review, 46(1), 263–303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-6598.2005.00318.x
Hieda, T. (2021). Linking electoral realignment to welfare politics: An assessment of partisan effects on active labour market policy in post-industrial democracies. Comparative European Politics, 19(5), 555–575. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-021-00246-5
Holland, A. C., & Schneider, B. R. (2017). Easy and hard redistribution: The political economy of welfare states in Latin America. Perspectives on Politics, 15(4), 988–1006. Hopia, H., Latvala, E., & Liimatainen, L. (2016). Reviewing the methodology of an integrative review. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 30(4), 662–669. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12327
King, D. S., & Rothstein, B. (1993). Institutional choices and labor market policy: A British-Swedish comparison. Comparative Political Studies, 26(2), 147–177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414093026002001
Lacomba, J. A., & Lagos, F. M. (2007). Political election on legal retirement age. Social Choice and Welfare, 29(1), 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-006-0199-7
Larsen, C. A., & Andersen, J. G. (2009). How new economic ideas changed the Danish welfare state: The case of neoliberal ideas and highly organized social democratic interests. Governance, 22(2), 239–261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01434.x
Lazear, E. P. (1979). Why is there mandatory retirement? Journal of Political Economy, 87(6), 1261–1284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/260835
Lehmann, H., & Muravyev, A. (2012). Labour market institutions and labour market performance: What can we learn from transition countries? Economics of Transition, 20(2), 235–269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0351.2012.00435.x
Lipsmeyer, C. S., & Zhu, L. (2011). Immigration, globalization, and unemployment benefits in developed EU states. American Journal of Political Science, 55(3), 647–664. Mabbett, D. (2016). The minimum wage in Germany: What brought the state in? Journal of European Public Policy, 23(8), 1240–1258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00509.x
Marx, P. (2015). The political behaviour of temporary workers. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137394873
Marx, P., & Starke, P. (2017). Dualization as destiny? The political economy of the German minimum wage reform. Politics & Society, 45(4), 559–584. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329217726793
Meinke, S. R. (2005). Long-term change and stability in house voting decisions: The case of the minimum wage. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 30(1), 103–126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3162/036298005X201473
Meyer, B. (2016). Learning to love the government: Trade unions and late adoption of the minimum wage. World Politics, 68(3), 538–575. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887116000058
Milojević, S. (2020). Practical method to reclassify Web of Science articles into unique subject categories and broad disciplines. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 183–206. Myles, J., & Quadagno, J. (2002). Political theories of the welfare state. Social Service Review, 76(1), 34–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00014
Nickell, S., & Layard, R. (1999). Labor market institutions and economic performance. In O. C. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (3C ed., pp. 3029–3084). Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4463(99)30037-7
Olson, M. (1971). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups (revised ed.). Harvard University Press.
OECD. (2020). Employment outlook.
OECD. (2021). Employment outlook.
Palley, T., Caldentey, E. P., & Vernengo, M. (2023). Varieties of capitalism: Second-generation perspectives. Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035312757
Picot, G. (2009). Party competition and reforms of unemployment benefits in Germany: How a small change in electoral demand can make a big difference. German Politics, 18(2), 155–179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644000902874257
Pilc, M. (2015). Determinants of the labour market institutions in post-socialist economies. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 48(2–3), 97–112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2015.06.008
Pilc, M. (2017). Cultural, political and economic roots of the labor market institutional framework in the OECD and post-socialist countries. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 12(4), 713–731. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.v12i4.37
Pinggera, M. (2023). Place and policy preferences – Spatial divides in attitudes towards social policies in Germany. Swiss Political Science Review, 29(1), 1–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12546
Pontusson, J., & Weisstanner, D. (2018). Macroeconomic conditions, inequality shocks and the politics of redistribution, 1990–2013. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(1), 31–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1310280
Potrafke, N. (2010). Labor market deregulation and globalization: empirical evidence from OECD countries. Review of World Economics, 146(3), 545–571. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-010-0056-8
Profeta, P. (2002). Retirement and social security in a probabilistic voting model. International Tax and Public Finance, 9(4), 331–348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016539016693
Pula, B. (2020). Disembedded politics: Neoliberal reform and labour market institutions in Central and Eastern Europe. Government and Opposition, 55(4), 557–577. Rasmussen, M. B., & Pontusson, J. (2018). Working-class strength by institutional design? Unionization, partisan politics, and unemployment insurance systems, 1870 to 2010. Comparative Political Studies, 51(6), 793–828. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414017710269
Rehm, P. (2011). Social policy by popular demand. World Politics, 63(2), 271–299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887111000037
Rueda, D. (2006). Social democracy and active labour-market policies: Insiders, outsiders and the politics of employment promotion. British Journal of Political Science, 36(3), 385–406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123406000214
Rueda, D. (2008). Social democracy inside out: Partisanship and labor market policy in industrialized democracies. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199216352.001.0001
Saint-Paul, G. (1998). A framework for analyzing the political support for active labor market policy. Journal of Public Economics, 67(2), 151–165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(97)00069-8
Saint-Paul, G. (2000). The political economy of labour market institutions. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0198293321.001.0001
Schmillen, A., Stops, M., & Wang, D. (2023). The determinants of China’s minimum wage rates. China & World Economy, 31(3), 59–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12489
Scorsone, E., & Klammer, S. (2021). An institutional perspective on unemployment insurance programs: Historical debates and future policy reforms in the coronavirus recession. Journal of Economic Issues, 55(2), 509–515. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2021.1913377
Seltzer, A. J. (1995). The political economy of the fair labor standards act of 1938. Journal of Political Economy, 103(6), 1302–1342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/601456
Silberman, J. I., & Durden, G. C. (1976). Determining legislative preferences on the minimum wage: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 84(2), 317–329. Singh, V. K., Singh, P., Karmakar, M., Leta, J., & Mayr, P. (2021). The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 126(6), 5113–5142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03948-5
Sobel, R. S. (1999). Theory and evidence on the political economy of the minimum wage. Journal of Political Economy, 107(4), 761–785. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/250078
Swank, D., & Martin, C. J. (2001). Employers and the welfare state: The political economic organization of firms and social policy in contemporary capitalist democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 34(8), 889–923. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414001034008003
Tepe, M., & Vanhuysse, P. (2012). Parties, unions and activation strategies: The context-dependent politics of active labour market policy spending. Political Studies, 61(3), 480–504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00996.x
Thomas, J., Harden, A., & Newman, M. (2012). Synthesis: Combining results systematically and appropriately. In D. Gough, S. Oliver & J. Thomas (Eds.), An introduction to systematic reviews (pp. 179–226). Sage.
Turrini, A., Koltay, G., Pierini, F., Goffard, C., & Kiss, A. (2015). A decade of labour market reforms in the EU: Insights from the LABREF database. IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 4(12). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40173-015-0038-5
Vindigni, A., Scotti, S., & Tealdi, C. (2015). Uncertainty and the politics of employment protection. Journal of Labor Economics, 33(1), 209–267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/678306
Vlandas, T. (2013). The politics of temporary work deregulation in Europe: Solving the French puzzle. Politics & Society, 41(3), 425–460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329213493754
Voigt, L. (2019). Get the party started: The social policy of the grand coalition 2013–2017. German Politics, 28(3), 426–443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2019.1585810
Walker, A., & Foster, L. (2006). Caught between virtue and ideological necessity: A century of pension policies in the UK. Review of Political Economy, 18(3), 427–448. Whitaker, E. A., Herian, M. N., Larimer, C. W., & Lang, M. (2012). The determinants of policy introduction and bill adoption: Examining minimum wage increases in the American States, 1997–2006. Policy Studies Journal, 40(4), 626–649. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2012.00467.x
Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x
Wiedemann, A. (2022). How credit markets substitute for welfare states and influence social policy preferences: Evidence from US States. British Journal of Political Science, 52(2), 829–849. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123420000708
Wiese, R., Jalles, J. T., & de Haan, J. (2024). Structural reforms and income distribution: New evidence for OECD countries. Oxford Economic Papers, 76(4), 1017–1088. Wright, R. (1986). The redistributive roles of unemployment insurance and the dynamics of voting. Journal of Public Economics, 31(3), 377–399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpae002
Zohlnhöfer, R., & Voigt, L. (2021). The partisan politics of employment protection legislation: Social democrats, Christian democrats, and the conditioning effect of unemployment. European Political Science Review, 13(3), 331–350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773921000114
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2024 WPiA UAM
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.