Keywords
sustainable lending
consumer credit
consumer
public interest
How to Cite
Number of views: 56
Number of downloads: 30
Abstract
The article focuses on the social pillar of sustainable development in relation to the consumer credit market. Unfair practices in this market can lead to an increase in poverty, social exclusion, and inequality, thus having a direct impact on societal well-being and sustainable development. The article aims to assess the impact of the social pillar of sustainable development on the concept of public interest, which encompasses social values and justifies interventions in that limit economic freedom in the consumer credit market. For the social pillar of sustainable development in this market, the articulation of the ‘sustainable lending’ postulate in the new Consumer Credit Directive is significant. The pursuit of ‘sustainable lending’ requires reconciling the public interest with the economic interests of entities in the consumer credit market, which involves balancing the interests of financial institutions and society as a whole. This involves not only lessening the discrepancies between the interests of the financial institutions and those of the consumer who concludes the agreement, but also reducing the divergence between the interests of the financial institutions and the interests of society at large. The regulatory legal instruments introduced in the EU Consumer Credit Directive may contribute to achieving the social values that constitute the social pillar of sustainable development. The scope of the legal changes demonstrates that not only political actions but also decisive legislative measures are being undertaken to protect the values associated with the social pillar of sustainable development.
References
Blicharz, R. (2004). Kategoria interesu publicznego jako przedmiot działania administracji publicznej [The category of public interest as an object of public administration activity]. Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis No. 2642. Przegląd Prawa i Administracji, 40, 39–43.
Borusiak, B. (2023). Dylematy i wyzwania ekonomii postwzrostu – perspektywa konsumentów, państwa i przedsiębiorców [Dilemmas and challenges of post-growth economics: consumers’, state’s and businesses’ perspectives]. Studia BAS, 2(74), 9–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31268/StudiaBAS.2023.09
Cherednychenko, O. O. (2017). The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and consumer credit: Towards responsible lending? In H. Collins (Ed.), European contract law and the Charter of Fundamental Rights (pp. 139–166). Intersentia. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780684963.007
Cherednychenko, O. O. (2020). EU financial regulation, contract law and sustainable consumer finance. In E. van Schagen & S. Weatherill (Eds.), Better regulation in EU contract law: The fitness check and the new deal for consumers (pp. 61–91). Hart Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509928385.ch-004
Cherednychenko, O. O., & Meindertsma, J. M. (2019). Irresponsible lending in the post-crisis era: Is the EU Consumer Credit Directive fit for its purpose? Journal of Consumer Policy, 42(4), 483–519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-019-09421-4
Dempsey, N., Bramley, G., Powers, S., & Brown, C. (2011). The social dimension of sustainable development: Defining urban social sustainability. Sustainable Development, 19(5), 289–300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.417
Fedorowicz, M., & Zalcewicz, A. (2024). Challenges posed to the EU financial market by the implementation of the concept of sustainable financing. Bialystok Legal Studies, 29(1), 47–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15290/bsp.2024.29.01.03
Gorynia, M. (2018). O pięknie nauk ekonomicznych [On the beauty of economic sciences]. Studia Ekonomiczne – Economic Studies, 1–2(96–97), 142–162.
Hickel, J. (2020). Less is more: How degrowth will save the world. Cornerstone Digital.
Hililamo, H. (2018). Household debt and economic crises, causes, consequences and remedies. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Jurkowska-Zeidler, A. (2017). Rola państwa w rozwiązywaniu kolizji interesów na rynku usług finansowych [Role of the state in resolving conflicts of interest on the financial services market]. Gdańskie Studia Prawnicze, 37, 187–201.
Kiczka, K. (2015) Wartości w publicznym prawie gospodarczym (zagadnienia wybrane) [Values in public economic law (selected issues)]. In J. Zimmermann (Ed.), Wartości w prawie administracyjnym (pp. 235–255). Wolters Kluwer.
Kieres, L. (2014). Konstytucyjne publiczne prawo gospodarcze [Constitutional public economic law]. Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny, 76(2), 191–213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/rpeis.2014.76.2.14
Kokocińska, K. (2018). Funkcjonalność i dysfunkcjonalność przepisów publicznego prawa gospodarczego z perspektywy kryterium wartości (zagadnienia ogólne) [Functionality and dysfunctionality of public economic law provisions from the perspective of the value criterion (general issues)]. In M. Zdyb, E. Kruk & G. Lubeńczuk (Eds.), Dysfunkcje publicznego prawa gospodarczego (pp. 25–38). C. H. Beck.
Kokocińska, K. (2019). Gwarancyjny charakter zasad prawa (rozważania na tle ustawy Prawo przedsiębiorców) [The guaranteeing nature of legal principles (reflections on the basis of the entrepreneurs’ law act)]. In R. Blicharz & A. Powałowski (Eds.), Prawo przedsiębiorcy (pp. 19–33). C. H. Beck.
Komierzyńska, E., & Zdyb, M. (2016). Klauzula interesu publicznego w działaniach administracji publicznej [Public interest clause in public administration activity]. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska Lublin – Polonia, 63(2), 161–179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17951/g.2016.63.2.161
Murphy, K. (2012). The social pillar of sustainable development: A literature review and framework for policy analysis. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 8(1), 15–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2012.11908081
Schicks, J. (2010). Microfinance over-indebtedness: Understanding its drivers and challenging the common myths. (CEB Working Paper no. 10/048). Université Libre de Bruxelles; Centre Emile Bernheim (CEB).
Stawicki, A., & Stawicki, E. (Eds.). (2016). Ustawa o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów. Komentarz [The Act on Competition and Consumer Protection: Commentary]. Wolters Kluwer Polska.
Stern, N. (2006). The economics of climate change: The Stern review. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817434
Strzyczkowski, K. (2018). Kilka uwag o istocie i granicach wolności gospodarczej [Some remarks on the objectification of economic fundamental rights]. Przegląd Prawa i Administracji, 114, 637–650. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19195/0137-1134.114.42
Strzyczkowski, K. (2023). Prawo gospodarcze publiczne [Public economic law] (7th ed.). Wolters Kluwer Polska.
Thin, N. (2002). Social progress and sustainable development. Kumarian Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3362/9781780441399.000
Van Loo, R. (2023). The public stakes of consumer law: The environment, the economy, health, disinformation, and beyond. Minnesota Law Review, 107, 2039–2114. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4308960
Wyrzykowski, M. (1986). Pojęcie interesu społecznego w prawie administracyjnym [The concept of social interest in administrative law]. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
Zimmermann, J. (Ed.). (2007). Koncepcja systemu prawa administracyjnego [The concept of the administrative law system]. Wolters Kluwer Polska.
Zimmermann, J. (2022). Prawo administracyjne [Administrative law] (10th ed.). Wolters Kluwer Polska.
License
Copyright (c) 2025 WPiA UAM
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.