Keywords
constitutional conventions
constitutionalism
How to Cite
Number of views: 344
Number of downloads: 350
Abstract
The word ‘constitution’ had only a descriptive meaning in the United Kingdom, being synonymous with the frame of government in existence before the American revolutionaries changed its sense by identifying it with the supreme law of the land. The United Kingdom does not, and indeed has never had, a constitution. And yet, it does have one, as its government operates under supreme general rules. Those rules are constitutional conventions. The word ‘constitution’ started to change its meaning in the United Kingdom when constitutional conventions emerged as rules that constrained, first, the monarch and then the parliament, in the exercising of their legal powers. In the 18th century the constitution was synonymous with law and unconstitutional behaviour was illegal. This changed in the first half of the 19th century when the British constitution became conventional. What it actually meant in the new environment was that to act in an unconstitutional way meant to act against the established convention, even if a given action was perfectly legal. Nevertheless, the British constitution is predominantly political because the supreme constitutional rules are non-legal and are not enforceable in the courts of law.References
Austin J., The Province of Jurisprudence Determined, Albemarle Street, London 1832.
Bailyn B., The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution, Cambridge-London 1992.
Bogdanor V., The New British Constitution, Oxford-Portland 2009.
Bogdanor V., S. Vogenauer, Enacting British Constitution: Some Problems, „Public Law” 2008, Spring
Cabra M.G.M., El Concepto de Constitución, „Anuario de Derecho Constitucional Latinoamericano” 2005.
Casper G., Changing Concepts of Constitutionalism: 18th to 20th Century, „Supreme Court Review” 1989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/scr.1989.3109639
Dicey A.V., Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, London 1915.
Elliott M., Parliamentary Sovereignty and the New Constitutional Order: Legislative Freedom, Political Reality and Convention, „Legal Studies” 22, 2002, nr 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.2002.tb00197.x
Fleiner T., The Age of Constitutions w: R. French, G. Lindell, Ch. Saunders (red.), Reflections on the Australian Constitution, Sydney 2003.
Freeman E.A., The Growth of the English Constitution, London 1876.
Fritz Ch.G., American Sovereigns. The People and America’s Constitutional Tradition Before the Civil War, Cambridge 2009.
Gee G., G.C.N. Webber, What is a Political Constitution?, „Oxford Journal of Legal Studies” 30, 2010, nr 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqq013
Gough J.W., Fundamental Law in English Constitutional History, Oxford 1955.
Griffith J.A.G., The Political Constitution, „Modern Law Review” 42, 1979, nr 9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1979.tb01506.x
Hood-Philips O., Constitutional Conventions: Dicey’s Predecessors, „Modern Law Review” 26, 1966, nr 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1966.tb01110.x
Hood-Philips O., Reform of the Constitution, London 1970.
Jefferson T., Notes on the State of Virginia, w: Thomas Jefferson. Writings, New York 1984.
Jenkins D., Common Law Declarations of Unconstitutionality, „International Journal of Constitutional Law” 7, 2009, nr 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mop004
Kruk M., Nowe projekty brytyjskiej konstytucji pisanej, „Państwo i Prawo” 1993, z. 8.
Maddox G., A Note on the Meaning of ‘Constitution’, „American Political Science Review” 76 1982, nr 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055400189622
McIlwain Ch.H., Constitutionalism: Ancient and Modern, Indianapolis 2010 [1940].
Mikuli P., Sądy a parlament w ustrojach Australii, Kanady i Nowej Zelandii (na tle rozwiązań brytyjskich), Kraków 2010.
Mill J.S., Considerations on Representative Government, New York 1862. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/12186-000
Paine T., Rights of Man w: Thomas Paine. Collected Writings, New York 1955.
Paley W., The Principles of Moral and Political Philosophy, Indianapolis 2002 [1788].
Prebble R., Constitutional Statutes and Implied Repeal: The Thoburn Decision and the Consequences for New Zealand, „Victoria University of Wellington Law Review” 36, 2005, nr 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v36i2.5604
Pułło A., Idea konstytucjonalizmu w systemie zasad prawa konstytucyjnego, „Przegląd Sejmowy” 1996, nr 5.
Ratnapala S., The Idea of a Constitution and Why Constitutions Matter, „Policy” 1999/2000.
Sartori G., Constitutionalism: A Preliminary Discussion, „American Political Science Review” 56, 1962, nr 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1952788
Smith D.E., The Crown, Bagehot and the Canadian Constitution, „Canadian Journal of Political Science” 28, 1995, nr 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423900019326
Sueur A. Le, Gordon Brown’s New Constitutional Settlement, „Public Law” 2008, Spring.
Szlachta B., Konstytucjonalizm czy absolutyzm? Szkice z francuskiej myśli politycznej XVI wieku, Kraków 2005.
The Governance of Britain, Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor by Her Majesty Command, July 2007 CM 7170, http://www.official-documents.gov.uk.
The Kentucky Resolutions of 1798. Resolutions Adopted by the Kentucky General Assembly, w: The Papers of Thomas Jefferson, t. 30: 1 January 1798 to 31 January 1799, Princeton-Oxford 2003.
The Selected Writings and Speeches of Sir Edward Coke (ed. S. Sheppard), Indianapolis 2003.
Vattel E. de, Les Droit des Gens. Ou Principes de la Loi Naturelle, Appliqués à la conduite & aux affaires des Nations & des Souverains, Londres 1758.
Wood G.S., The Creation of the American Republic 1776-1787, Chapel Hill-London 1998.
Zięba A., Współczesne brytyjskie doktryny polityczne, Białystok 2001.
License
Copyright (c) 2012 WPiA UAM
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.