Keywords
passing of tax law
impact of the CJEU jurisprudence
How to Cite
Number of views: 684
Number of downloads: 1754
Abstract
The paper is devoted to the methodological aspects of research on the impact of the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on the passing of Polish tax law. The text indicates that rulings of the CJEU can have a direct influence on the national legal system when the ruling concerns a given provision of national law, or an indirect influence when the ruling concerns a similar provision in the national law or in the law of other states. The conducted research is based on the assumption that although the effects of CJEU rulings in principle affect the sphere of law application, they also have a significant impact on the passing of Polish tax law. Therefore, the rulings of the CJEU relating to the provisions of Polish tax laws are examined. As a result of the analysis, judgments which have a direct impact on Polish tax law are selected. The research described in the text shows that these judgments were issued after the proceedings initiated by the Commission and following requests submitted to the CJEU by a national court to give a preliminary ruling.Funding
Faculty of Law and Administration of the Adam Mickiewicz University
Poznań
References
Ahlt, M., Szpunar, M. (2011). Prawo europejskie. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.
Komarek, J. (2007). Infringements in application of Community law: some problems and (im)possibile solutions. Review of European Administrative Law 1: 87–98.
Mik, C. (2000). Europejskie prawo wspólnotowe. Zagadnienia teorii i praktyki. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.
Pistone, P. (2010). The impact of ECJ case law on national taxation. Bulletin for International Taxation 64(8/9): 412–428.
Półtorak, N. (2002). Odpowiedzialność odszkodowawcza państwa w prawie Wspólnot Europejskich. Kraków.
Półtorak, N. (2012a). Komentarz do art. 258 Traktatu o Funkcjonowaniu Unii Europejskiej, [w:] D. Kornobis-Romanowska, J. Łacny, A. Wróbel (red.), Traktat o Funkcjonowaniu Unii Europejskiej. Komentarz. Tom 3. WKP – wydanie elektroniczne.
Półtorak, N. (2012b). Komentarz do art. 259 Traktatu o Funkcjonowaniu Unii Europejskiej, [w:] D. Kornobis-Romanowska, J. Łacny, A. Wróbel (red.), Traktat o Funkcjonowaniu Unii Europejskiej. Komentarz. Tom 3. WKP– wydanie elektroniczne.
Półtorak, N. (2012c). Komentarz do art. 260 Traktatu o Funkcjonowaniu Unii Europejskiej, [w:] D. Kornobis-Romanowska, J. Łacny, A. Wróbel (red.), Traktat o Funkcjonowaniu Unii Europejskiej. Komentarz. Tom 3. WKP – wydanie elektroniczne.
Šadl, U. (2016). National courts and the effectiveness of EU law, [w:] B. de Witte, J. A. Mayoral, U. Jaremba, M. Wind, K. Podstawa (eds.), National Courts and EU Law. New Issues, Theories and Methods. Cheltenlham-Northhampton: Edward Elgar Publishing: 68–103.
Szpunar, M. (2012). Komentarz do art. 267 Traktatu o funkcjonowaniu Unii Europejskiej, [w:] D. Kornobis-Romanowska, J. Łacny, A. Wróbel (red.), Traktat o funkcjonowaniu Unii Europejskiej. Komentarz. Tom 3. WKP – wydanie elektroniczne.
Witte, B. de (2016). The preliminary ruling dialogue: three types of questions posed by national courts, [w:] B. de Witte, J.A. Mayoral, Jaremba, M. Wind, K. Podstawa (eds.), National Courts and EU Law. New Issues, Theories and Methods. Cheltenlham-Northhampton: Edward Elgar Publishing: 15–25.
Voje, J. (2018). EU tax dispute resolution directive (2017/1852): paving the path toward a European tax court? European Taxation 58(7): 309–317.
Wojtaszek-Mik, E. (2007). Charakter i skutki orzeczenia prejudycjalnego, [w:] M. Wąsek-Wiaderek, E. Wojtaszek-Mik (red.), Pytanie prejudycjalne do Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Wspólnot Europejskich. Warszawa: 78–96.
License
Copyright (c) 2019 WPiA UAM
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.