Keywords
innovation
social innovation
solutionism
How to Cite
Number of views: 221
Number of downloads: 271
Abstract
Design thinking (DT) is emerging today in many contexts – from business to education to social innovation – as an attractive method for solving a broad range of problems. However, despite its popularity and the fact that the approach utilises concepts and research methods borrowed from sociology and other social sciences, it has received surprisingly little attention within sociological reflection. The purpose of this article is to fill this gap by discussing the main assumptions of the design thinking approach, and first and foremost by making a sociological critique of it and presenting possible options for how sociology as a discipline might react to its popularity. The article is discussion-based and inspired by research in science and technology studies (STS), the critical approach in sociology, and Pierre Bourdieu's concept of the institutional field. The results of the analysis presented here show in what sense design thinking can be attractive to sociology as a discipline - not just as a certain set of tools, but as a different and at the same time inspiring cognitive perspective (accepting provisionality and pragmatism), pursuing to some extent the agenda of synthetic sociology. At the same time, the article shows that the approach is susceptible to criticism for operating with simplistic assumptions, for being solutionist, and for its entanglement in socio-economic dependencies.
Funding
Badania, których efektem jest ten tekst, były dofinansowane z grantu Narodowego Centrum Nauki, konkurs OPUS, projekt nr 2018/29/B/HS6/02145
References
Afeltowicz, Ł., Pietrowicz, K. (2013). Maszyny społeczne. Wszystko ujdzie, o ile działa. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Afeltowicz, Ł., Suchomska J., Goszczyński W. (2021). Partycypacyjne badania w działaniu: analiza polskich doświadczeń. Avant 12(3): 1–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26913/avant.2021.03.04
Berkhout, P.H.G., Muskens, J.C., Velthuijsen J.W. (2000). Defining the rebound effect. Energy Policy 28(6/7): 425–432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00022-7
Bloomfield, B.P., Latham, Y., Vurdubakis, T. (2010). Bodies, technologies, and action possibilities: when is an affordance? Sociology 44(3): 415–433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038510362469
Boltanski, L., Chiapello, È. (2018). The New Spirit of Capitalism. London: Verso Books.
Bourdieu, P. (2005). The Social Structure of the Economy. Trans. by Ch. Turner. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Brown, T. (2009). Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation. Harper Business.
Brown, T., Wyatt, J. (2010). Design thinking for social innovation. Development Outreach 12(1): 29–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/1020-797X_12_1_29
Bröckling, U. (2015). The Entrepreneurial Self: Fabricating a New Type of Subject. London: SAGE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473921283
Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues 8(2): 5–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637
Chen, J. (2009). A Warm Embrace That Saves Life. https://www.ted.com/talks/jane_chen_a_warm_embrace_that_saves_lives [dostęp: 2.05.2022].
Collins, H., Pinch, T. (2004). The Golem at Large: What You Should Know about Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cross, N. (2011). Design Thinking: Understanding How Designers Think and Work. Oxford: Berg. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474293884
Cross, N., Dorst, K., Roozenburg, N. (1992). Research in Design Thinking. Proceedings of a Workshop Meeting Held at the Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering. Delft: Delft University Press.
Dam, R.F. (2021). 5 Stages in the Design Thinking Process. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/5-stages-in-the-design-thinking-process [dostęp: 2.05.2022].
Dorst, K. (2011). The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application. Design Studies 32(6): 521–532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.006
Drèze, J., Sen, A. (1990). Hunger and Public Action. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0198283652.001.0001
Dukala, K., Pyrkosz-Pacyna, J., Czarny, R. (2023). DTMethod: a new evidence-based design thinking methodology for effective teamwork. Sustainability 15(5): 4187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054187
Gibson, J. (2014). The theory of affordances. In: J.J. Gieseking et al. (eds.), The People, Place, and Space Reader (pp. 56–60). New York: Routledge.
Heijne, K., van der Meer, H. (2019). Road Map for Creative Problem Solving Techniques: Organizing and Facilitating Group Sessions. Boom.
IDEO. (2012). Design Thinking for Educators. https://page.ideo.com/design-thinking-edu-toolkit [dostęp: 2.05.2022].
Johansson-Sköldberg, U., Woodilla, J., Çetinkaya, M. (2013). Design thinking: past, present and possible futures. Creativity and Innovation Management 22(2): 121–146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12023
Kaufman, J.C., Sternberg, R.J. (eds.). (2010). The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511763205
Kelley, T., Kelley, D. (2013). Creative Confidence: Unleashing the Creative Potential within us All. New York: Crown Business.
Kimbell, L. (2011). Rethinking design thinking: Part I. Design and Culture 3(3): 285–306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2752/175470811X13071166525216
King, S., Chang, K. (2016). Understanding Industrial Design: Principles for UX and interaction design. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media, Inc.
Knorr Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Harvard: Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674039681
Ku, B., Lupton, E. (2022). Health Design Thinking. Creating Products and Services for Better Health. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/14494.001.0001
Liedtka, J. (2018). Why design thinking works. Harvard Business Review 96(5): 72–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2018.13004abstract
Liedtka, J., Salzman, R., Azer, D. (2018). Design Thinking for the Greater Good. Innovation in the Social Sector. New York: Columbia Business School Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/lied17952
Lockwood, T. (ed.) (2010). Design Thinking: Integrating Innovation, Customer Experience, and Brand Value. New York: Allworth Press.
Martin, R.L. (2009). The Design of Business: Why Design Thinking is the Next Competitive Advantage. Harvard Business Press.
Morozov, E. (2013). To Save Everything, Click Here: Technology, Solutionism, and the Urge to Fix Problems that Don’t Exist. London: Penguin Books.
Norman, D. (2013). The Design of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.
Osborn, A. (1967). Your Creative Power. Charles Scribner’s Sons: New York
Rowe, P.G. (1991). Design Thinking. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Seitz, T. (2020). Design Thinking and the New Spirit of Capitalism: Sociological Reflections on Innovation Culture. Trans. Lisa Cerami. Cham: Springer International Publishing DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31715-7
Sheppard, B. et al. (2018). The Business Value of Design. McKinsey Quarterly, October 25, 2018.
Simon, H.A. (1973). The structure of ill structured problems. Artificial Intelligence 4(3/4): 181–201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(73)90011-8
Skowrońska, M. (2019). Miasto i myślenie projektowe. Design thinking jako skrzynka narzędziowa. Człowiek i Społeczeństwo 48: 75–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/cis.2019.48.5
Stewart, S.C. (2011). Interpreting design thinking. Editorial. Design Studies 32(6): 515–520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.08.001
Watts, D.J. (2017). Should social science be more solution-oriented? Nature Human Behaviour 1: article no. 0015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0015
Wiggins, B.J., Christopherson, C.D. (2019). The replication crisis in psychology: an overview for theoretical and philosophical psychology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 39(4): 202–217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/teo0000137
Zielińska, E. (2013). Design thinking. Model pracy badawczej w obliczu dzikich problemów nauk społecznych. Stan Rzeczy 4: 168–185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51196/srz.4.10
License
Copyright (c) 2023 WPiA UAM
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.