Keywords
Israel
mnemonic policy
memory laws
mnemonic constitutionalism
How to Cite
Number of views: 106
Number of downloads: 116
Abstract
The governance over collective memory and narratives about the past is an element of the memory policy of the majority of states in the world. This policy is carried out by means of various instruments, including those belonging to the catalogue of legal measures and often manifesting themselves in the form of mnemonic constitutionalism. In the case of Israel, the memory policy has a special character, however. It is focused on the crime of the Holocaust, established not only as a universal symbol of ultimate evil and genocide, but also as a cornerstone of the emergence of the Israeli statehood. The reference to the Holocaust in Israel is also a determinant of the attitude of the state – and the law – to Palestinian collective historical memory and attempts to regulate it. In the view of the lasting conflict, it also seems necessary to consider this aspect of mnemonic policy. The aim of the scholarly reflection in the present article is to analyse the measures, and in particular the legal measures, by which Israel has built and continues to shape its identity, as well as the most controversial methods of creating this identity, including legal ones. This article attempts to present the role of the Holocaust in the Israeli mnemonic policy and constitutionalism, with particular focus placed on the context of the permanent crisis in the Palestinian-Israeli relations, or more broadly, Arab-Israeli relations. The analysis carried out leads to the conclusion that, although Israel’s motives in pursuing a particular policy of remembrance remain largely understandable and legitimate, their implementation sometimes causes not only violations of certain standards of human rights protection, but are also used to the detriment of an already fragile, if not currently broken, peace process.
Funding
Tekst powstał w ramach międzynarodowego projektu grantowego „The Challenge of Populist Memory Politics for Europe: Towards Effective Responses to Militant Legislation on the Past”, finansowanego przez Volkswagen Stiftung.
References
Adelman, H., Barkan, E. (2011). No Return, No Refuge: Rites and Rights in Minority Repatriation. New York: Columbia University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/adel15336
Ariely, G. (2021). Collective memory and attitudes toward asylum seekers: evidence from Israel. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 47(5): 1084–1102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2019.1572499
Bachmann, K., Garuka, Ch. (eds.) (2020). Criminalizing History: Legal Restrictions on Statements and Interpretations of the Past in Germany, Poland, Rwanda, Turkey and Ukraine. Berlin, Bern, Bruxelles, New York, Oxford, Warsaw, Wien: Peter Lang. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3726/b16604
Barkan, E., Lang, A. (eds.) (2022). Memory Laws and Historical Justice: The Politics of Criminalizing the Past. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94914-3
Belavusau, U. (2020). Mnemonic constitutionalism and rule of law in Hungary and Russia. Interdisciplinary Journal of Populism 1(1): 16–29. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3768037
Botelho, G. (2015). Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu criticized for saying Holocaust was mufti’s idea, not Hitler’s. CNN, October 22, 2015. https://edition.cnn.com/2015/10/21/middleeast/netanyahu-hitler-grand-mufti-holocaust/index.html
Brog, M. (2003). Victims and Victors: Holocaust and Military Commemoration in Israel Collective Memory. Israel Studies 8(3): 65–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/is.2004.0001
Davidson, N.R., Hostovsky Brandes, T. (2022). Israeli Courts and the Paradox of International Human Rights Law. European Journal of International Law 33(4): 1243–1261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chac070
Douglas, L. (2005). The Memory of Judgment: Making Law and History in the Trials of the Holocaust. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Freund, M. (2022, 10 March). President Zelensky: Stop invoking the Holocaust – opinion. The Jerusalem Post. https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-700918
Fronza, E. (2018). Memory and Punishment: Historical Denialism, Free Speech and the Limits of Criminal Law. Berlin: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-234-7
Gensburger, S. (2011). The Righteous among the Nations as elements of collective memory. International Social Science Journal 62(203/204): 135–146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2451.2011.01799.x
Gliszczyńska-Grabias, A. (2021). ‘Never Again’ as a cornerstone of the Strasbourg system: the reminiscence of the Holocaust in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. W: H. Ast, E. Demir (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights: Current Challenges in Historical and Comparative Perspective (s. 200–220). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839108341.00019
Goldberg, A. (2012). The ‘Jewish narrative’ in the Yad Vashem global Holocaust museum. Journal of Genocide Research 14(2): 187–213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14623528.2012.677761
Gutman, Y., Tirosh, N. (2021). Balancing atrocities and forced forgetting: memory laws as a means of social control in Israel. Law & Social Inquiry 46(3): 705–730. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2020.35
Halpern, B., Reinharz, J. (1998). Zionism and the Creation of a New Society. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hazony, Y. (2018). The current crisis in Israel’s Constitution. W: S. Rabinovitch (eds.), Defining Israel: The Jewish State, Democracy, and the Law (s. 145–158). Cincinnati: Hebrew Union College Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvd7w82b.9
Heinze, E. (2017). Beyond ‘memory laws’: towards a general theory of law and historical discourse. W: U. Belavusau, A. Gliszczyńska-Grabias (eds.), Law and Memory: Towards Legal Governance of History (s. 413–433). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316986172.021
Kapshuk, Y., Strömbom, L. (2021). Israeli pre-transitional justice and the Nakba Law. Israel Law Review 54(3): 305–323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021223721000157
Koposov, N. (2017). Memory Laws, Memory Wars: The Politics of the Past in Europe and Russia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108304047
Kretzmer, D., Ronen, Y. (2021). The Occupation of Justice: The Supreme Court of Israel and the Occupied Territories. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190696023.001.0001
Krotoszyński, M. (2017). Modele sprawiedliwości tranzycyjnej. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.
Lipstadt, D. (2011). The Eichmann Trial. New York: Schocken.
Mälksoo, M. (2023). Handbook on the Politics of Memory. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800372535
Margalit, A. (2002). The Ethics of Memory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674040595
Młynarska-Sobaczewska, A. (2014). Normatywizacja pamięci zbiorowej w preambułach do konstytucji państw postkomunistycznych. Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego 2(18): 233–250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15804/ppk.2014.02.14
Orentlicher, D. (2022). Victim participation and social impact: contemporary lessons of the Eichmann trial. Minnesota Journal of International Law 31(2): 35–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4180872
Pendas, D.O. (2017). The Eichmann trial in law and memory. W: J. Meierhenrich, D.O. Pendas (eds.), Political Trials in Theory and History (s. 205–228). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139941631.008
Ram, M., Yacobi, H. (2012). African asylum seekers and the changing politics of memory in Israel. W: I. Glynn, J.O. Kleist (eds.), History, Memory and Migration: Perceptions of the Past and the Politics of Incorporation (s. 154–170). Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137010230_8
Resnik, J. (2003). ‘Sites of memory’ of the Holocaust: shaping national memory in the education system in Israel. Nations and Nationalism 9(2): 297–317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8219.00087
Rubinstein, E. (1998). The Declaration of Independence as a basic document of the State of Israel. Israel Studies 3(1): 195–210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/is.2005.0096
Shafir, G. (2016). Is Israel a colonial state? W: E. Ben-Rafael, J.H. Schoeps, Y. Sternberg, O. Glöckner (eds.), Handbook of Israel: Major Debates (s. 794–808). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110351637-056
Shapira, A. (2016). The debate over the “New Historians” in Israel. W: E. Ben-Rafael, J.H. Schoeps, Y. Sternberg, O. Glöckner (eds.), Handbook of Israel: Major Debates (s. 888–908). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110351637-061
Shindler, C. (2013). A History of Modern Israel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139236720
Shohat, E. (1988). Sephardim in Israel: Zionism from the standpoint of its Jewish victims. Social Text 19(20): 1–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/466176
Urquhart, C. (2004, 22 December). Settlers fight back with symbol of the Holocaust. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/dec/22/israel
Wistrich, R. (1997). Israel and the Holocaust trauma. Jewish History 11(2): 13–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02335674
Zweig, R.W. (2001). German Reparations and the Jewish World: A History of the Claims Conference. London: Routledge.
License
Copyright (c) 2023 WPiA UAM
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.