Selected legal challenges of InsurTech on the example of robo-advisory
PDF (Język Polski)

Keywords

robo-advice
InsurTech
IDD Directive
insurance law

How to Cite

Olechowski, P. A. (2024). Selected legal challenges of InsurTech on the example of robo-advisory. Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny I Socjologiczny, 86(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.14746/rpeis.2024.86.1.05

Number of views: 321


Number of downloads: 192

Abstract

The article aims to assess technological solutions introduced to the insurance market from a legal perspective. More precisely, the research aims to indicate whether the InsurTech phenomenon, based on the example of robo-advice, leads to the emergence of other threats to clients and, consequently, different legal challenges. All this raises questions about the adequacy of the current legal regulations. To resolve this question, the formal-dogmatic method as well as criticism and analysis of the literature were used. The analysis leads to the conclusion that technological innovations implemented in the insurance sector dramatically change the nature of the phenomenon in question when compared to the distribution of insurance carried out conventionally. Such a position must at least encourage the search for different interpretations of  the applicable regulations, in order to neutralize the newly created threats. The author notes and explains how selected obligations arising from Directive (EU) 2016/97 on insurance distribution (IDD Directive) and its implementation into Polish law (Act of 15 December 2017 on Insurance Distribution) should therefore be understood differently. The article’s topic is extremely relevant due to the rich development of the InsurTech phenomenon in today’s world. Every insurer introduces new solutions of this type into its enterprise, for example, to optimize business operations. Therefore, this is an unstoppable process and it is necessary to conduct research in this area.

https://doi.org/10.14746/rpeis.2024.86.1.05
PDF (Język Polski)

Funding

National Science Centre (Poland), grant no. 2018/29/B/HS5/01281

References

Accenture, i Polska Izba Ubezpieczeń. (2018). Cyfryzacja sektora ubezpieczeń w Polsce. https://piu.org.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/ACC_PIU_Raport-Cyfryzacja-Ubezpieczen-w-Polsce.pdf

Arner, D. W., Barberis, J., i Buckley, R. P. (2016). The evolution of FinTech: A new post-crisis paradigm? University of New South Wales Law Research Series, 62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2676553

Baker, T., i Dellaert, B. (2019). Behavioral finance, decumulation and the regulatory strategy for RoboAdvice. W: J. Agnew i O. S. Mitchell (red.), The disruptive impact of fintech on retirement systems (s. 1–10). Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198845553.003.0009

Better Finance. The European Federation of Investors and Financial Services Users. (2020, December). Robo-advice 5.0: Can consumers trust robots? Pobrane 21 maja 2022, z: https://betterfinance.eu/publication/robo-advice-5-0-can-consumers-trust-robots/

Capgemini. (2017). 7 World Insurance Report 2017. https://hollandfintech.com/2017/12/capgemini-world-insurance-report-2017

European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority. (2017). European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority InsurTech Roundtable. How technology and data are reshaping the insurance landscape. https://register.eiopa.europa.eu/Publications/Reports/08.0_EIOPA-BoS17-165_EIOPA_InsurTech_Roundtable_summary.pdf

European Securities and Markets Authority. (2015, 4 December) Joint Committee Discussion Paper on automation in financial advice. Pobrane 20 czerwca 2022, z: https://www.esma.europa.eu/document/discussion-paper-automation-in-financial-advice

European Securities and Markets Authority. (2018, 6 listopad). Wytyczne w sprawie określonych aspektów wymogów dyrektywy MiFID II dotyczących odpowiedniości. https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/esma35-43-1163_guidelines_on_certain_aspects_of_mifid_ii_suitability_requirements_pl.pdf

Financial Stability Board. (2017). Financial stability implications from FinTech. https://www.fsb.org/wp-content/uploads/R270617.pdf

Houben, R., Muynck, M. De, i Hendrickx, A. (2020). Financial consumers: beware of robo-advice(?!). Journal of International Banking Law and Regulation, 35(2), 55–56. https://hdl.handle.net/10067/1650230151162165141

International Association of Insurance Supervisors. (2018, November). Issues paper on increasing digitalisation in insurance and its potential impact on consumer outcomes. Pobrane 7 lipca 2022, z: https://www.iaisweb.org//?s=Issues+paper+on+increasing+digitalisation+in+insurance+

Jajuga, K. (2019). Czy FinTechy zmienią oblicze rynku finansowego: szanse, możliwości, bariery, Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny we Wrocławiu.

Jung, D., Dorner, V., Glaser, F., i Moran, S. (2018). Robo-advisory: Digitalization and automation of financial advisory. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 60(1), 81–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-018-0521-9

Köhne, T., i Brömmelmeyer, C. (2018). The new insurance distribution regulation in the EU – A critical assessment from a legal and economic perspective. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance. Issues and Practice, 43(4), 704–739. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48720430 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41288-018-0089-0

Komisja Europejska. (2018). Komunikat Komisji do Parlamentu Europejskiego, Rady, Europejskiego Banku Centralnego, Europejskiego Komitetu Ekonomiczno-Społecznego i Komitetu Regionów z 8 marca 2018 r. – Plan działania w zakresie technologii finansowej: w kierunku bardziej konkurencyjnego i innowacyjnego europejskiego sektora finansowego. COM(2018)0109 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PL/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52018DC0109

Kumar, N. (2018). The insurance advisor of the future: How robots are set to reshape the value framework in insurance. Infosys. https://www.infosysbpm.com/mccamish/resources/Documents/insurance-advisor-of-the-future.pdf

Marano, P. (2019). Navigating InsurTech: The digital intermediaries of insurance products and customer protection in the EU. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 26(2), 294–315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X19830345

Maume, P. (2019). Regulating robo-advisory. Texas International Law Journal, 55(1), 49–87.

Mezzanotte, F. E. (2020). An examination into the investor protection properties of robo-advisory services in Switzerland. Capital Markets Law Journal, 15(4), 489–508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cmlj/kmaa024

Mik, E. (2020). Engineering consent: Using technology to create informed consumers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3732682

Nowak, J. (2018). Komentarz do art. 7. W: P. Czublun (red.), Ustawa o dystrybucji ubezpieczeń. Komentarz (nb. 3). Legalis.

Olechowski, P. A. (2023). Robodoradztwo w sektorze ubezpieczeniowym. W: K. Szpyt (red.), Insur-Tech. Nowe technologie w branży ubezpieczeń (s. 181–193). C. H. Beck.

Oracle Polska. (b.d.). Czym jest sztuczna inteligencja? Dowiedz się więcej o sztucznej inteligencji. Pobrane 7 marca 2022, z https://www.oracle.com/pl/artificial-intelligence/what-is-ai/

Ostrowska, M., i Balcerowski, M. (2022). The idea of robotic insurance mediation in the light of the European Union Law. W: P. Marano i K. Noussia (red.), InsurTech: A legal and regulatory view (s. 199–210). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27386-6_9

Paterson, J. M. (2021). Algorithmic advisers: Strategies for scrutinising the quality of performance. Working Draft.

Ringe, W. G., i Ruof, C. (2018). A Regulatory Sandbox for Robo Advice. European Banking Institute Working Paper Series 2018 – no. 26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3188828

Shin, T. (2020, 4 June). Real-life examples of discriminating artificial intelligence: Real-life examples of AI algorithms demonstrating bias and prejudice. Towards Data Science. https://towardsdatascience.com/real-life-examples-of-discriminating-artificial-intelligence-cae395a90070

Tereszkiewicz, P., i Południak-Gierz, K. (2021). Liability for incorrect client personalization in the distribution of consumer insurance. Risks, 9(5), Article 83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/risks9050083

Urząd Komisji Nadzoru Finansowego. (2020, 4 listopada). Stanowisko Urzędu Komisji Nadzoru Finansowego w sprawie świadczenia usługi robo-doradztwa. https://www.knf.gov.pl/knf/pl/komponenty/img/Stanowisko_UKNF_ws_swiadczenia_uslugi_robo_doradztwa_71303.pdf

Waliszewski, K. (2020a, 14 sierpnia). Automatyczne doradztwo finansowe puka do drzwi. Pobrane 8 listopada 2021, z: https://www.obserwatorfinansowy.pl/bez-kategorii/rotator/automatycznedoradztwo-finansowe-puka-do-drzwi/

Waliszewski, K. (2020b). Robo-doradztwo jako przykład fin-techu — problem regulacji i funkcjonowania. Przegląd Ustawodawstwa Gospodarczego. Business Law Journal, 73(7), 12–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33226/0137-5490.2020.7.2

Waliszewski, K., i Zięba-Szklarska, M. (2020). Robo-advisors as automated personal financial planners – swot analysis. Finanse i Prawo Finansowe, 3(27), 155–173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/2391-6478.3.27.09

Yeomans, M., Shah, A., Mullainathan, S., i Kleinberg, J. (2019). Making sense of recommendations. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 32(4), 403–414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2118