Keywords
judicature
US Supreme Court
theory of attitiudinal changes
theory of strategic behavior
How to Cite
Number of views: 166
Number of downloads: 81
Abstract
The subject of this article is the impact of public opinion on the judicature of the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), a topic that has thus far received limited attention in Polish legal scholarship. In a democratic system, public opinion has a decisive impact on the shape of political decisions, but certain spheres of social life are typically regarded as exempt from such influence. The judiciary is considered to be one of these spheres, and in a liberal democratic system, it plays the role of a guarantee of the rights and freedoms of individuals and the minorities against the ‘tyranny of the majority’ – a view that dominates in the American constitutional discourse. Based on an analysis of the literature from representatives of American legal, sociological and political discourse, two theories were presented to explain the essence of these relations. The first theory – the theory of attitudinal changes – assumes that the changes observed in social moods and changes in judicial decisions are not directly related but run parallel to each other, though under the influence of the same trends and social changes. The second theory – the theory of the strategic behaviour of the SCOTUS justices – posits a direct impact of social moods on the decisions of SCOTUS justices, who in the long term adapt their decisions to social trends. This does not mean that the SCOTUS cannot rule against social moods – it very often does so – but this results in a decrease in the level of its legitimacy.
References
Bryan, A. C., i Kromphardt, Ch. D. (2016). Public opinion, public support, and counter-attitudinal voting on the U.S. Supreme Court. Justice System Journal, 37(4), 298–317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0098261X.2016.1179608
Cardozo, B. (1921). The nature of the judicial process. Yale University Press.
Casillas, C., Enns, P. K., i Wohlfarth, P. C. (2011). How public opinion constrains the U.S. Supreme Court. American Journal of Political Science, 55(1), 74–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00485.x
Clark, T. S. (2009). The separation of powers, court curbing, and judicial legitimacy. American Journal of Political Science, 53(4), 971–989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00411.x
Collins, T. A., i Cooper, Ch. A. (2016). The case salience index, public opinion, and decision making on the U.S. Supreme Court. Justice System Journal, 37(3), 232–245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0098261X.2015.1130105
Dahl, R. A. (1959). Decision-making in a democracy: The Supreme Court seems a national policy-maker. Journal of Public Law, 6, 279–295.
Devins, N., i Mansker, N. (2010). Public opinion and state supreme courts. Journal of Constitutional Law, 13(2), 455–509. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/facpubs/1169
Durr, R. H., Martin, A. D., i Wolbrecht, Ch. (2000). Ideological divergence and public support for the Supreme Court. American Journal of Political Science, 44(4), 768–776. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2669280
Enns, P. K., i Wohlfarth, P. C. (2013). The Swing Justice. Journal of Politics, 75(4), 1089–1107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381613001035
Epstein, L., i Martin, E. D. (2010). Does public opinion influence Supreme Court? Possibly yes (but we’re not sure why). Journal of Constitutional Law, 13(2), 263–281. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/jcl/vol13/iss2/2
Epstein, L., i Segal, J. A. (2000). Measuring issue salience. American Journal of Political Science, 44(1), 66–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2669293
Flemming, R. B., i Wood, B. D. (1997). The public and the Supreme Court: Individual justice responsiveness to American policy moods. American Journal of Political Science, 41(2), 468–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2111773
Friedman, B. (2009). The will of the people: How public opinion has influenced the Supreme Court and shaped the meaning of the Constitution. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Gibson, J. L. (2007). The Legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court in a polarized polity. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4(3), 507–538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00098.x
Giles, M. W., Blackstone, B., i Vining, R. L. (2008). The Supreme Court in American democracy: Unraveling the linkages between public opinion and judicial decision making. Journal of Politics, 70(2), 293–306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381608080316
Graglia, L. A. (2005). Constitutional law without the Constitution: The Supreme Court’s remaking of America. W: R. H. Bork (red.), A country I do not recognize: The legal assault on American values (s. 1–57). Hoover Institution Press.
Hall, M. E. K. (2014). The semiconstrained court: Public opinion, the separation of powers, and the U.S. Supreme Court’s fear of nonimplementation. American Journal of Political Science, 58(2), 352–366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12069
Hamilton, A. (2008). The Federalist: 78. W: L. Goldman (red.), A. Hamilton, J. Madison, J. Jay, The Federalist Papers. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230102019_47
Hanych, M., Smekal, H., i Benák, J. (2023). The influence of public opinion and media on judicial decision-making: Elite judges’ perceptions and strategies’. International Journal for Court Administration, 14(3), 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.528
Hirschek, R. (2004). Towards juristocracy: The origins and consequences of the new constitutionalism. Harvard University Press.
Johnson, B., i Strother, L. (2021). The Supreme Court’s (surprising?) indifference to public opinion. Political Research Quarterly, 74(1), 18–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912920958080
Johnson, Ch., i Canon, B. C. (1984). Judicial policies: Implementation and impact. CQ Press.
Jozefski, K. N., Bueno, X., Turner, R. C., Crawford, B. L., i Lo, W. J. (2023). People’s knowledge of and attitudes toward abortion laws before and after the Dobbs v. Jackson decision. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters, 31(1), 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2023.2233794
Kuśmierski, S. (1997). Opinia publiczna. Wprowadzenie do teorii. Wydawnictwo Wyższej Szkoły Ekonomicznej.
Laclou, E., i Mouffe, Ch. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards radical democratic politics. Verso Books.
Link, M. W. (1995). Tracking public mood in the Supreme Court: Cross-time analyses of criminal procedure and civil rights cases. Political Research Quarterly, 48(1), 61–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299504800104
Machaj, Ł. (2016). Pozycja ustrojowa Sądu Najwyższego Stanów Zjednoczonych. W: M. Jabłoński (red.), Identyfikacja granic wolności i praw. Prawnoporównawcza analiza tożsamego przypadku pod kątem praktyki stosowania prawa amerykańskiego i polskiego (s. 35–50). E-Wydawnictwo. Prawnicza i Ekonomiczna Biblioteka Cyfrowa. Wydział Prawa, Administracji i Ekonomii Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego. https://www.bibliotekacyfrowa.pl/publication/79781
May, M. S. (2013). Judicial Retentin Election after 2010. Indiana Law Review, 46, 59–86. https://journals.indianapolis.iu.edu/index.php/inlawrev/article/view/18029
McGuire, K. T., i Stimson, J. A. (2004). The least dangerous branch revisited: New evidence on Supreme Court responsiveness to public preferences. Journal of Politics, 66(4), 1018–1035. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2004.00288.x
Mishler, W., i Sheehan, R. S. (1993). The Supreme Court as a countermajoritarian institution? The Impact of public opinion on Supreme Court decisions. American Political Science Review, 87(1), 87–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2938958
Mishler, W., i Sheehan, R. S. (1996). Public opinion, the attitudinal model, and Supreme Court decision making: A micro-analytic perspective. Journal of Politics, 59(4), 1114–1142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2960354
Młyniec, E. (2002). Opinia publiczna. Wstęp do teorii. Wydawnictwo Forum Naukowe.
Mondak, J. J. (1990). Perceived legitimacy of Supreme Court decisions: Three functions of source credibility. Political Behavior, 12(4), 363–384. https://www.jstor.org/stable/586189 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992794
Mondak, J. J. (1992). Institutional legitimacy, policy legitimacy and Supreme Court. American Politics Quarterly, 20(4), 457–477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X9202000406
Norpoth, H., i Segal, J. A. (1994). Comment: Popular influence on Supreme Court decisions. American Political Science Review, 88(3), 711–716. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2944805
Parrington, V. L. (1968). Główne nurty myśli amerykańskiej (H. Krzeczkowski, tłum.). Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy.
Pildes, R. H. (2010). Is the Supreme Court a majoritarian institution? The Supreme Court Review, 2010, 103–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/658919
Rhan, W. M., Kroeger, B., i Kite, C. M. (1996). A framework for the study of public mood. Political Psychology, 17(1), 29–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3791942
Scalia, A. (2009). Mullahs of the West: Judges as moral arbiters. Biuro Rzecznika Praw Obywatelskich. https://www.rpo.gov.pl/pliki/12537879280.pdf
Schotland, R. A. (2011). Iowa’s 2010 judicial election: Appropriate accountability or rampant passion? Court Review, 46, 118–128. https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/681
Segal, J. A., i Spaeth, H. J. (2002). The Supreme Court and the attitudinal model revisited. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615696
Skitka, L. J., Bauman, Ch. W., i Leyte, B. L. (2009). Limits on legitimacy: Moral and religious convictions as constraints on deference to authority. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(4), 567–578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015998
Staniszewski, R. (2012). Opinia publiczna – teoretyczny sens i zakres pojęcia. Studia Politologiczne, 25, 108–124.
Staton, J. K. (2010). Judicial power and strategic communication in Mexico. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750632
Stimson, J. (1991). Public opinion in America: Moods, cycles and swings. Westview Press.
Stimson, J. A., Mackuen, M. B., i Erikson, R. S. (1995). Dynamic representation. American Political Science Review, 98(3), 543–565. h DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2082973
Stimson, J. A. (2004). Tides of consent how public opinion shapes American politics. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791024
Strother, L. (2019). Case salience and the influence of external constraints on the Supreme Court. Journal of Law and Courts, 7(1), 129–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/701274
Unah, I., Rosano, K., i Milam, K. D. (2015). U.S. Supreme Court justices and public mood. Journal of Law & Politics, 30, 293–340. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2584520
Zaller, J. (1998). Definicje opinii publicznej. W: J. Szczupaczyński (red.), Władza i społeczeństwo: Antologia tekstów z zakresu socjologii polityki (tom 2, s. 217–231). Scholar.
Zarefsky, D. (1994). “Public sentiment is everything”: Lincoln’s view of political persuasion. Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association 15(2), 23–40. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20148909 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5406/19457987.15.2.04
License
Copyright (c) 2025 WPiA UAM
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.