Keywords
duty of care
medical law
medical professionals
civil liability
How to Cite
Number of views: 0
Number of downloads: 0
Abstract
There is a lack of publications in Polish scholarly literature that draw attention to solutions concerning the medical standards of care applied in other countries. Such publications could serve as inspiration for interpreting the significance of medical standards in Poland, as well as for drafting relevant legislation. This would be facilitated by the fact that the issue of these standards is universal, and their significance is widely recognized. The article aims to investigate the concept of medical standards, the entity creating them, the process of their creation, their place within the common law system, and the impact of the guidelines on the judicial practice in England and Wales. The article uses a dogmatic legal method. A comparative method was also used to make comments on other legal systems in order to highlight the specific nature of the regulations in question. The study showed that English standard-setting procedures are transparent. They also ensure the participation of society. England and Wales implement a structured, monocentric system for setting standards of medical practice. Standards developed by expert teams are based on the evidence-based medicine, which eliminates the subjective beliefs of medical authorities. Standards are less frequently called into question in court proceedings. This is a significant convenience for the medical professional community, as it provides them with a basic source of guidance on the proper approach to specific clinical cases. At the same time, it increases the stability and predictability of court rulings.
Funding
This paper was created under the National Science Centre (Poland) project no. 2021/41/B/HS5/04277.
References
Alonso-Coello, P., Ifan, A., Sola, I., Gich, I., Delgado-Noguera, M., Rigau, D., Tort, S., Bonfill, X., Burgers, J., i Schunemann, H. (2010). The quality of clinical practice guidelines over the last two decades: A systematic review of guideline appraisal studies. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 19(6), 1–7.
Black, J. (1996). Constitutionalising self-regulation. The Modern Law Review, 59(1), 24–55.
Black, N., Murphy, M., Lamping, D., McKee, M., Sanderson, C., Askham, J., i Marteau, T. (1999). Consensus development methods: A review of best practice in creating medical guidelines. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 4, 236–248.
Boratyńska, M., i Konieczniak, P. (2019). Standardy wykonywania zawodu lekarza. W: M. Boratyńska i P. Konieczniak (red.), System prawa medycznego: Tom 2. Cz. 1. Regulacja prawna czynności medycznych (s. 270–327). Wolters Kluwer.
Borysiak, W. (2020). Kilka uwag o pojęciu należytej staranności w stosunkach regulowanych przez prawo medyczne. Studia Prawa Prywatnego, 3–4, 35–57.
Borysiak, W. (2024). Concept of due care in medical law in a comparative perspective. European Journal of Health Law, 31(1), 1–26.
Bosek, L. (2018). Specyficzne źródła prawa medycznego. W: L. Bosek i M. Safjan (red.), System prawa medycznego: Tom 1. Instytucje prawa medycznego (s. 287–318). C. H. Beck.
Bosek, L. (2025). Komentarz do art. 6. W: L. Bosek (red.), Ustawa o prawach pacjenta i Rzeczniku Praw Pacjenta. Komentarz (s. 96–120). C. H. Beck.
Brazier, M., i Miola, J. (2000). Bye-bye Bolam: A medical litigation revolution? Medical Law Review, 8(1), 85–114.
Cave, E., i Brazier, M. (2016). Medicine, patients and the law. Manchester University Press.
Chin-Yee, B. H. (2014). Underdetermination in evidence-based medicine. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 20(6), 921–927.
Cohen, A. M., Starvi, P. Z., i Hersh, W. R. (2004). A categorization and analysis of the criticism of evidence-based medicine. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 73(1), 35–43.
Darbyshire, P. (2014). Darbyshire on the English legal system. Sweet & Maxwell.
Eden, J., Levit, L., Berg, A., i Morton, S. (2011). Finding what works in health care: Standards for systematic reviews. National Academies Press.
Evetts, J. (2011). Sociological analysis of professionalism: Past, present and future. Comparative Sociology, 10(1), 1–37.
Field, M. J., i Lohr, K. N. (1990). Clinical practice guidelines: Directions of a new program. National Academic Press.
Freidson E. (2001). Professionalism: The third logic. University of Chicago Press.
Gillespie, A. A. (2013). The English legal system. Oxford University Press.
Girdwoyń, A. (2022). Należyta staranność lekarza (Niepublikowana rozprawa doktorska). Uniwersytet Warszawski. Rep. 1091088408
Goldacre, B., Drysdale, H., Dale, A., Milosevic, I., Slade, E., Hartley, P., Marston, M., Powell-Smith, A., Heneghan, C., i Mahtani, K. R. (2019). COMPare: A prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time. Trials, 20, artykuł 118.
Górski, A., Grassmann, M., i Sarnacka, E. (red.). (2019). Standard wykonywania zawodów medycznych. C. H. Beck.
Guyatt, G. (1991). Evidence-based medicine. American College of Physicians (ACP) Journal Club Annals of Internal Medicine, 14(2), 2420–2425.
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., Schünemann, H. J. (2008). GRADE: An emerging consensus or rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. British Medical Journal, 336(7560), 1106–1110.
Guyatt, G., Cook, D., i Hayens, B. (2004). Evidence based medicine has come a long way. British Medical Journal, 329(7473), 990–991.
Herring, J. (2012). Medical law and ethics. Oxford University Press.
Jansen, F. J. (2020). Professional regulation and medical guidelines: Real forces behind the development of evidence-based guidelines. Cambridge University Press.
Kennedy, I., i Grubb, A. (1998). Principles of medical law. Oxford University Press.
Knaapen, L. (2013). Being evidence-based in the absence of evidence: The management of nonevidence in guideline development. Social Studies of Science, 43(5), 681–706.
Kulkarni, A. V. (2005). The challenges of evidence-based medicine: A philosophical perspective. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 8, 255–260.
Nolan, D., i Davies, J. (2013). Torts and equitable wrongs. W: A. Burrows (red.), English private law (s. 928–971). Oxford University Press.
Ogus, A. (1995). Rethinking self-regulation. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 15(1), 97–108.
Petzold, T., Deckert, S., Williamson, P. R., i Schmitt, J. (2018). Quality measurement recommendations relevant to clinical guidelines in Germany and the United Kingdom: (What) can we learn from each other? INQUIRY. The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing, 55, 1–10.
Różyńska, J. (2018). Międzynarodowe standardy etyczne i profesjonalne w biomedycynie. W: R. Kubiak i L. Kubicki (red.), System prawa medycznego: Tom 1. Pojęcie, źródła i zakres prawa medycznego (s. 115–118). Wolters Kluwer.
Samanta, A., Melo, M. M., Foster, Ch., Tingle, J., i Samanta, J. (2006). The role of medical guidelines in medical negligence litigation: A shift from the Bolam Standard? Medical Law Review, 14(3), 321–366.
Samanta, J. (2021). Book Review of Friso Johannes Janses, Professional Regulation and Medical Guidelines: The Real Forces Behind the Development of Evidence-Based Guidelines. Medical Law Review, 29(2), 392–401.
Samanta, J., Samanta, A., i Beswick, J. (2021). Responsible practice or restricted practice? An empirical study of the use of clinical guidelines in medical negligence litigation. Medical Law Review, 29(2), 205–232.
Sibbald, B., i Roland, M. (1998). Why are randomized controlled trials important. British Medical Journal, 316(7126), 201.
Sobolewski, P. (2018). Prawo pacjenta do świadczeń zdrowotnych. W: L. Bosek i M. Safjan (red.), System prawa medycznego: Tom 1. Instytucje prawa medycznego (s. 810–822). C. H. Beck.
Trail, W. R., i Allen, B. A. (1996). Goverment Created medical practice guidelines: The opening of Pandora Box. Journal of Law and Health, 10(2), 233–236.
Tymiński, R. (2023). Charakter prawny standardów postępowania medycznego i jego konsekwencje w procesie stosowania prawa. Przegląd Sądowy, 7–8, 21–38.
Widłak, T. (2017). Interpretacja klauzuli aktualna wiedza medyczna w polskim prawie – zarys zagadnień epistemologicznych i metodologicznych. Gdańskie Studia Prawnicze, 38, 603–613.
Zajdel, J. (2010). Moc prawna standardów medycznych i wytycznych praktyki klinicznej. Medycyna Praktyczna, 5, 119–124.
License
Copyright (c) 2026 WPiA UAM
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.