Keywords
anthroparchy
globalisation of law
privatisation of armed conflicts
transnational lex corrupta
How to Cite
Number of views: 299
Number of downloads: 282
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to assess the phenomenon of the privatisation of armed conflict from the perspective of the personal theory of New Global Law developed by Rafael Domingo. Since the 1990s there has appeared a tendency towards the decentralisation and delegation of the authority of the State to use force, both internally and internationally. At the turn of the twentieth century the traditional form of mercenary became outdated and inconvenient because of the existing prohibitions in international law. Private military companies introduced corporate standards into the market for military services. The article suggests that one of the main tasks of contemporary constitutional theory is the generalisation and reformulation of the concept of the constitution of the nation state in view of the need to work out a universal model of a world constitution. The author is interested in answers to questions such as: How does the globalisation of the law take place?, and also What is globalisation for? For this purpose the article refers to the ideas of Rafael Dominigo.Funding
National Science Centre Research Grant No. DEC-2013/08/M/HS5/00345
References
Adams, T.K. (1999), The new mercenaries and the privatization of conflict, Parameters: U.S. Army War College, 29(2): 103-110.
Dobrzeniecki, K. (2008), Lex informatica, Toruń.
Domingo, R. (2011), The New Global Law, Cambridge.
Gwiazda, A. (2014), Prywatne wojsko, Wiedza i Życie 4: 32-35.
Kinsey, C. (2006), Corporate Soldiers and International Security, New York.
McDonald, A. (2007), Ghosts in the machine: some legal issues concerning US military contractors on Iraq, [w:] Schmitt, M.N., Pejic, J. (eds.), International Law And Armed Conflict, Exploring the Faultlines: Essays in Honour of Yoram Dinstein, Leiden: 357-403.
Moravcsik, A. (1997), Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics, International Organization 51(4): 513-553.
Moravcsik, A. (2003), Liberal international relations theory: a scientific assessment, [w:] Elman, C., Elman, M.F. (red.), Progress in International Relations Theory: Appraising the Field, Cambridge: 159-204.
MacCormick, N. (1997), Institutional normative order: a conception of law, Cornell Law Review 82: 1051-1970.
MacCormick, N. (1999), Questioning Sovereignty, Oxford.
Percy, S. (2007), Mercenaries: The History of a Norm in International Relations, Oxford.
Sidakis, D. (2009), Private Military Companies and State Sovereignty: Regulating Transnational Flows of Violence and Capital, [w:] Eckert, J., von Benda-Beckmann, F., von Benda-Beckmann, K., Rules of Law and Laws of Ruling: On the Governance of Law, Farnham: 61-83.
Slaughter Burley, A.M. (1993), International Law and International Relations Theory: A Dual Agenda, American Journal of International Law 87(2): 205-239.
Slaughter, A.M. (2000), A Liberal Theory of International Law, [w:] Proceedings of the 94th Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law: 240-253.
Slaughter, A.M. (2003), Global Government Networks, Global Information Agencies, and Disaggregated Democracy, Michigan Journal of International Law 24: 1041-1075.
Teubner, G. (1997) Global Bukowina: Legal Pluralism in the World Society, [w:] Global Law Without a State, Aldershot: 3-28.
Teubner, G. (2004), Global Private Regimes: Neo-Spontaneous Law and Dual Constitution of Autonomous Sectors?, [w:] Ladeur, K.H. (ed.), Public Governance in the Age of Globalisation, Aldershot: 71-87.
Teubner, G. (2004), Konstytucjonalizm społeczny: alternatywy dla teorii konstytucyjnej nakierowanej na państwo, Wykład im. Leona Petrażyckiego, tłum. J. Winczorek, Warszawa.
Thomson, J. (1996), Mercenaries, Pirates, and Sovereigns, Princeton, NJ.
Weber, M. (1998), Polityka jako zawód i powołanie, tłum. A. Kopacki, P. Dybel, Kraków-Warszawa.
Wolf, A.H. de (2006), Modern condottieri in Iraq: Privatizing war from the perspective of international and human rights law, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 13(2): 315-356.
License
Copyright (c) 2016 WPiA UAM
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.