Abstract
The main objective of this paper is to identify which theories regarding the phenomenon of Initial Public Offerings underpricing are applicable to the Polish stock market. To accomplish that goal a study of determinants of IPO underpricing at the Polish stock market between 2007 and 2016 was conducted. Its results indicate that over the study period the average initial adjusted return was 7.89% which is significantly lower than the value obtained in the previous studies at the Polish market. The strongest determinant of underpricing turned out to be the information asymmetry proxied by the reduction rate in the individual investors tranche. This allowed to confirm the relevance of Kevin Rock’s winner’s curse theory on the Polish market. These results did not provide grounds for rejecting the hypothesis of the positive influence of the structure of the offer on underpricing, which is in line with another asymmetry theory introduced by Lawrence Benveniste and Paul Spindt. Moreover, the study confirmed the ‘hot market issue’ hypothesis which indicates that underpricing of IPO is higher in favourable market conditions. On the other hand, the same results rejected the hypothesis of higher underpricing of the privatisation offers as well as the hypothesis of the reliance on the positive impact of scale of the offer on the initial return.References
Aussenegg, W. (1999), Going Public in Poland: Case-by- Case Privatizations, Mass Privatization and Private Sector Initial Public Offerings, Vienna University of Technology, Austrian Working Group on Banking and Finance, Vienna.
Benveniste, L.M., Spindt, P.A. (1989), How investment bankers determine the offer price and allocation of new issues, Journal of Financial Economics 24.
Biais, B., Perotti, E. (2002), Machiavellian privatization, American Economic Review, 92.
Bradley, D.J., Jordan, B.D. (2000), Partial adjustment to public information and IPO underpricing, The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 37.
Brennan, M.J., Franks, J. (1997), Underpricing: ownership and control in initial public offerings of equity securities in U.K, Journal of Financial Economics 45.
Briston, R., Jelic, R. (2003), The choice of privatization method and the financial performance of newly privatized firms in transition economies, Journal of Business, Finance and Accounting 30.
Czapiewski, L, Jewartowski, T., Kałdoński, M., Mizerka, J. (2011), Determinanty natychmiastowych stóp zwrotu z akcji spółek Skarbu Państwa dokonujących pierwotnych ofert publicznych, Poznań.
Ibbotson, R.G. (1975), Price performance of common stock new issues, Journal of Financial Economics 2.
Ljungqvist, A. (2004), IPO Underpricing, Empirical Corporate Finance, NYU Press, New York.
Ljungqvist, A., Nanda, V., Singh, R. (2006), Hot markets, investor sentiment and IPO pricing, Journal of Business 79.
Loughran, T., Ritter, J. (2004), Why has IPO underpricing changed over time?, Financial Management 33(3): 5–37.
Lyn, E.O., Zychowicz, E.J. (2003), The performance of new equity offerings in Hungary and Poland, Global Finance Journal 14.
Miller, E. (2000), Long Run Underperformance of Initial Public Offerings: An Explanation, University of New Orleans, Department of Economics and Finance Working Papers, New Orleans.
Rock, K. (1986), Why New Issues Are Underpriced, „Journal of Financial Economics” 15.
Stoughton, N.M., Zechner, J. (1998), IPO mechanisms monitoring and ownership structure, Journal of Financial Economics 49.
Tinic, S.M. (1988), Anatomy of IPO of common stock, Journal of Finance 43.
Welch, I. (1989), Seasoned offerings, imitation costs and thee underpricing of IPO, The Journal of Finance, 44: 421–449.
License
Copyright (c) 2017 WPiA UAM
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.