Abstract
The aim of the article is to present the spatial differentiation of tax expenditures in municipalities of Wielkopolskie Voivodeship and to identify factors explaining this differentiation. Tax expenditures should be understood as the lost tax revenue related to the applied tax preferences. The study covered four local taxes, i.e. real estate tax, agricultural tax, forestry tax and vehicle tax, for which municipalities have limited tax authority. Panel models were used in the empirical analysis and the study covered 226 municipalities in Wielkopolskie Voivodeship in the period 2013–2022. The study showed that municipalities in Wielkopolskie Voivodeship apply tax preferences to a varying extent, which translates into varying amounts of lost tax revenue. Between 2013 and 2022, the amount of tax expenditures amounted to PLN 5.2 billion, which accounted for 5.6% of own income. During the period under review, the largest tax preferences were introduced in the municipality of Suchy Las (nearly PLN 190 million), while the smallest were introduced in the municipality of Luboń (PLN 9.5 million). Interestingly, both of these municipalities are adjacent to Poznań, but the former is a rural municipality and the latter an urban one. The most important factors explaining the variation in tax expenditures in the municipalities of Wielkopolskie Voivodeship were the tax policy pursued in neighbouring municipalities and wealth. Decisions to introduce tax preferences taken in a given unit are a response to what is happening in neighbouring units. The use of tax expenditures is thus driven by the desire to maintain and increase political capital, which is best explained by the concept of yardstick competition. Wealthy municipalities with a high level of own income try to engage in competition with neighbouring municipalities by means of applied tax preferences. The role of aspects such as population density and the electoral cycle in explaining the spatial variation of tax expenditures in the municipalities of Wielkopolskie Voivodeship was much smaller. Only in the case of agricultural, the size of the municipality mattered. The smaller the municipality, the higher the tax expenditures. This indicates that less anonymity and closer and more frequent contact between the government and residents lead to a wider use of tax preferences.
References
Besley T., Case A. 1995. Incumbent Behavior: Vote-Seeking, Tax-Setting, and Yardstick Competition. The American Economic Review, 85, 1: 25-45.
Bykov S.S., Zimmermann H. 2018. Tax expenditure as a problem in intergovernmental relations. Journal of Tax Reform, 1(4): 27-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2018.4.1.043
Dziemianowicz R., Wyszkowski A. 2012. Preferencje w podatkach lokalnych i ich wpływ na dochody JST. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska. Sectio H, Oeconomia, 46(3): 165-174.
Dziemianowicz R., Wyszkowski A., Budlewska R. 2014. Tax expenditures jako ukryta forma wydatków publicznych. Gospodarka Narodowa, 3(271): 35-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33119/GN/100876
Etel L., Dowgier R. 2013. Podatki i opłaty lokalne – czas na zmiany. Temida, 2. Białystok.
Felis P., Gołębiowski G. 2021. Tax Expenditures in Local Taxes – an Effective Instrument of Local Tax Policy? The Example of Poland. Contemporary Economics, 15(4): 393-414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5709/ce.1897-9254.456
Felis P., Otczyk G. 2021. Zróżnicowanie fiskalnych skutków gminnej polityki podatkowej w Polsce. Studia Biura Analiz Sejmowych, 1(65): 77-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31268/StudiaBAS.2021.06
Głowicka-Wołoszyn R., Wieczorek A., Satoła Ł. 2018. Własny potencjał dochodowy a zadłużenie gmin miejskich w województwie wielkopolskim. Nierówności Społeczne a Wzrost Gospodarczy, 56(4): 175-187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15584/nsawg.2018.4.14
Gomułowicz A., Małecki J. 2006. Podatki i prawo podatkowe. Wydawnictwo Prawnicze LexisNexis, Warszawa.
Kańduła S., Przybylska J. 2022. Odpowiedź polskich gmin na pierwszą falę kryzysu COVID-19. [W:] S. Kańduła, J. Przybylska (red.), Gospodarka w cieniu pandemii COVID-19. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu, Poznań, s. 75-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18559/978-83-8211-104-0/4
Kufel T. 2011. Ekonometria. Rozwiązywanie problemów z wykorzystaniem programu GRETL. Wyd. III. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
Łukomska J., Swianiewicz P. 2015. Polityka podatkowa władz lokalnych w Polsce. Municipium SA, Warszawa.
Maddala G.S. 2008. Ekonometria. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
Małkowska A., Telega A., Głuszak M., Marona B. 2021. Spatial diversification of property tax policy – Searching for yardstick competition in Polish metropolitan areas. Land Use Policy, 109: 105613. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105613
Ministerstwo Finansów. 2010. Preferencje podatkowe w Polsce (https://www.podatki.gov.pl/media/1237/preferencje-podatkowe-w-polsce-warszawa-2010.pdf; dostęp: 2.07.2024).
Ministerstwo Finansów. 2018. Preferencje podatkowe w Polsce (https://www.podatki.gov.pl/media/7339/raport-preferencje-podatkowe-w-polsce-nr-8.pdf; dostęp: 2.07.2024).
Mouritzen P.E. 1989. The Local Political Business Cycle. Scandinavian Political Studies, 12(1): 37-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.1989.tb00080.x
Nordhaus W.D. 1975. The Political Business Cycle. Review of Economic Studies, 42(2): 162-190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2296528
Oates W.E. 1972. Fiscal Federalism. Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, New York.
OECD 2010. Tax Expenditures in OECD Countries. OECD Publishing.
Perdał R., Burchardt M. 2023. Zmiany nierówności przestrzennych dochodów w Polsce na poziomie lokalnym w latach 2004-2021. Rozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna, 69: 91-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/rrpr.2023.65.07
Poniatowicz M. 2018. Koncepcja federalizmu fiskalnego w systemie finansów samorządu terytorialnego. CeDeWu, Warszawa.
Salmon P. 1987. Decentralization as an incentive scheme. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 3(2): 24-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/3.2.24
Skorwider J. 2012. Skutki korzyści i preferencji podatkowych dla budżetów gminnych jednostek samorządu terytorialnego. Zeszyty Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Bankowej we Wrocławiu, 29: 151-168.
Sosnowski M. 2018. Rola i znaczenie preferencji podatkowych w podatkach lokalnych. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 528: 215-229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15611/pn.2018.528.19
Staley T.C. 2018. The Impact of Tax and Expenditure Limitations on Municipal Revenue Volatility. State and Local Government Review, 50(2): 71-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X18785211
Surrey S.S. 1973. Pathways to Tax Reform: The Concept of Tax Expenditures. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States (reprint 2014 edition). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674436503
Tiebout Ch.M. 1956. A pure theory of local expenditures. The Journal of Political Economy, 64(5): 416-424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/257839
Trojanek M., Kisiała W., Trojanek R. 2021. Do local governments follow their neighbours’ tax strate-gies? Tax mimicking amongst Polish municipalities. Land Use Policy, 108: 105576. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105576
Wojtyra B. 2017. Poziom wielofunkcyjnego rozwoju obszarów wiejskich województwa wielkopolskiego. Rozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna, 40: 149-161.
Wyszkowski A. 2010. Koncepcja tax expenditures w systemie podatkowym. Gospodarka Narodowa, 242(9): 65-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33119/GN/101165
Wyszkowska A., Wyszkowski A. 2021. Tax expenditures w podatkach lokalnych w Polsce jako instrument lokalnej polityki podatkowej. Studia BIAS, 1(65): 103-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31268/StudiaBAS.2021.07
Villela L., Lemgruber A., Jorratt M. 2010. Tax expenditure budgets concepts and challenges for implementation. IDB Working Paper Series No. IDB-WP-131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18235/0012209
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Paweł Motek
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.