Owidiusz i Stacjusz, Tebaida 6.54–78. Aluzje konieczne czy metapoetycki dialog?

Main Article Content

Damian Pierzak

Abstrakt

Statius’ description of the funeral games held in honor of the baby Opheltes contains several utterances reminiscent of Ovid. The paper aims to show that these should not be read as the so-called necessary allusions, but rather as the poet’s complex dialogue with his predecessor.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Dział
COMMENTATIONES

Bibliografia

  1. Primary sources
  2. Callimachus, vol. I: Fragmenta. Ed. by R. Pfeiffer. 1949. Oxford.
  3. Fontes Iuris Romani Antejustiniani, pars prima: Leges. Ed. by S. Riccobono. 1968. Florentiae.
  4. Lactantius Placidus, In Statii Thebaida commentum. Ed. by R. D. Sweeney. 1997. Stutgardiae–Lipsiae.
  5. P. Ovidius Naso, Amores, Medicamina faciei femineae, Ars amatoria, Remedia amoris. Ed. by E. J. Kenney. 1961. Oxford.
  6. P. Ovidius Naso, Fastorum libri sex. Ed. by E. H. Alton, D. E. W. Wormell, and E. Courtney. 1978. Leipzig.
  7. Ovid, Fasti. With an English translation by J.G. Frazer, second edition revised by G.P. Goold. 1989. Cambridge (Mass.)–London.
  8. P. Ovidius Naso, Metamorphoses. Ed. by W. S. Anderson. 1982. Leipzig.
  9. P. Ovidius Naso, Tristium libri quinque, Ibis, Ex ponto libri quattuor, Halieutica, Fragmenta. Ed. by S. G. Owen. 1915. Oxford.
  10. Silius Italicus, Punica. Ed. by J. Delz. 1987. Stutgardiae.
  11. P. Papinius Statius, Thebais. Ed. by A. Klotz, editionem correctiorem curavit T. C. Klinnert. 1973. Leipzig.
  12. Secondary sources
  13. Anderson 1972: Anderson, W.S. (ed.). 1972. Ovid’s Metamorphoses, Books 6–10. Norman.
  14. Aricò 1963: Aricò, G. “Ovidio in Stazio: Theb. V, 505 ss.” Aevum 37 (1/2) 1963: 120–123.
  15. Barchiesi 1997: Barchiesi, A. 1997. The Poet and the Prince. Ovid and Augustan Discourse. Berkley–Los Angeles–London.
  16. Bardon 1952: Bardon, H. 1952. La littérature latine inconnue, Tome I: L’époque républicaine. Paris.
  17. Bonanno 1990: Bonanno, M. G. 1990. L’allusione necessaria. Ricerche intertestuali sulla poesia greca e latina. Roma.
  18. Bömer 1943: Bömer, F. 1943. Ahnenkult und Ahnenglaube im alten Rom. Leipzig–Berlin.
  19. Bömer 1958: Bömer F. (Hrsg.) 1958. P. Ovidius Naso, Die Fasten. Band II: Kommentar. Heidelberg.
  20. Bömer 1980: Bömer, F. 1980. P. Ovidius Naso, Metamorphosen: Kommentar. Buch X–XI. Heidelberg.
  21. Bruère 1958: Bruère, R. T. 1958. “Color Ovidianus in Silius Punica 1–7.” In Ovidiana. Recherches sur Ovide. Ed. by N. I. Herescu, 475–499. Paris.
  22. Burck 1979: Burck, E. 1979. “Die ›Thebais‹ des Statius.” In Das römische Epos. Ed. by E. Burck, 300–358. Darmstadt.
  23. Cancik 1965: Cancik, H. 1965. Untersuchungen zur lyrischen Kunst des P. Papinius Statius. Hildesheim.
  24. Dodds 1951: Dodds, E. R. 1951. The Greeks and the Irrational. Berkeley–Los Angeles.
  25. Edmunds 2001: Edmunds, L. 2001. Intertextuality and the Reading of Roman Poetry. Baltimore–London.
  26. Fantham 1996: Fantham, E. 1996. Roman Literary Culture. From Cicero to Apuleius. Baltimore–London.
  27. Fortgens 1934: Fortgens, H. W. 1934. P. Papinii Statii de Opheltis funere carmen epicum, Thebaidos liber VI 1–295, versione Batava commentarioque exegetico instructum, diss. Groningen, Zutphen.
  28. Fowler 1997: Fowler, D. 1997. “On The Shoulders of Giants: Intertextuality and Classical Studies.” Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 39: 13–34.
  29. Harder 2012: Harder, A. (ed.). 2012. Callimachus, Aetia. Volume 2: Commentary, Oxford.
  30. Heinze 1960 [1919]: Heinze, R. 1960 [1919]. “Ovids elegische Erzählung.” In Richard Heinze. Vom Geist des Römertums. Ausgewählte Aufsätze. Ed. by E. Burck, 308–403. 3Darsmtadt.
  31. Keith 2004/2005: Keith, A. 2004/2005. “Ovid’s Theban narrative in Statius’ Thebaid.” Hermathena 177/178: 181–207.
  32. Kwapisz 2018: Kwapisz, J. 2018. “The Three Preoccupations of Simias of Rhodes.” In Hellenistica Posnaniensia: Faces of Hellenistic Lyric, Aitia 8.1. Ed. by J. Kwapisz. Acessed January 17, 2020. http://journals.openedition.org/aitia/2117 ; DOI : 10.4000/aitia.2117
  33. Kwapisz 2019: Kwapisz, J. 2019. “‘Linking Together Rushes and Stalks of Asphodel’: The Forms of Theocritean Poetry.” In Brill’s Companion to Theocritus, 22 pp. (forthcoming).
  34. Leberl 2004: Leberl, J. 2004. Domitian und die Dichter. Poesie als Medium der Herrschaftsdarstellung. Göttingen.
  35. Littlewood 2001: Littlewood, R. J. 2001. “Ovid among the Family Dead: the Roman Founder Legend and Augustan Iconography in Ovid’s Feralia and Lemuria.” Latomus 60 (4): 916–935.
  36. Marincola 2010: Marincola, J. 2010. “The Rhetoric of History: Allusion, Inertextuality, and Exemplarity in Historiographical Speeches.” In Stimmen der Geschichte. Funktionen von Reden in der antiken Historiographie. Ed. by D. Pausch, 259–289. Berlin–New York.
  37. Massimilla 1996: Massimilla, G. (ed.), Callimaco. Aitia. Libri primo e secondo. Pisa.
  38. McNelis 2006: McNelis, C. 2006. Statius’ Thebaid and the Poetics of Civil War. Cambridge.
  39. Miller 2002: Miller, J. F. 2002. “The Fasti: Style, Structure, and Time.” In Brill’s Companion to Ovid. Ed. by B. Weiden Boyd, 167–196. Leiden–Boston–Köln.
  40. Monella 2004: Monella, P. 2004. “Lara, l’ αἴτιον, l’etimo (Ov. Fast. 2, 583–616).” In Nunc teritur nostris area maior equis. Riflessioni sull’intertestualità ovidiana. I Fasti. Ed. by L. Landolfi, 47–67. Palermo.
  41. Mottram 2012: Mottram, P. J. 2012. A Commentary on Statius Thebaid 6.1–192, diss. Liverpool.
  42. Mozley 1933: Mozley, J. H. 1933. “Statius as an Imitator of Vergil and Ovid.” The Classical Weekly 27 (5): 33–38.
  43. Nagy 2015: Nagy, G. 2015. Masterpieces of Metonymy. From Ancient Greek Times to Now. Cambridge (Mass.)–London.
  44. Newlands 2004a: Newlands, C. E. 2004. Statius’ Silvae and the Poetics of Empire. Cambridge.
  45. Newlands 2004b: Newlands, C. E. 2004. “Statius and Ovid: Transforming the Landscape.” Transactions of the American Philological Association 134 (1): 133–155.
  46. Prescendi 2000: Prescendi, F. 2000. Frühzeit und Gegenwart. Eine Studie zur Auffassung und Gestaltung der Vergangenheit in Ovids Fastorum libri. Frankfurt a. M.
  47. Rosati 2002: Rosati, G. 2002. “Narrative Techniques and Narrative Structures in the Metamorphoses.” In Brill’s Companion to Ovid. Ed. by B. Weiden Boyd, 271–304. Leiden–Boston–Köln.
  48. Schetter 1960: Schetter, W. 1960. Untersuchungen zur epischen Kunst des Statius. Wiesbaden.
  49. Snyder 1981: McIntosh Snyder, J. 1981. “The Web of Song: Weaving Imagery in Homer and the Lyric Poets.” The Classical Journal 76 (3): 193–196.
  50. Southern 1997: Southern, P. 1997. Domitian. Tragic Tyrant. London–New York.
  51. Stroh 1969: Stroh, W. 1969. Ovid im Urteil der Nachwelt. Eine Testimoniensammlung. Darmstadt.
  52. Styka 1994: Styka, J. 1994. Studia nad literaturą rzymską epoki republikańskiej. Estetyka satyry republikańskiej; estetyka neoteryków. Kraków.
  53. Toynbee 1971: Toynbee, J. M. C. 1971. Death and Burial in the Roman World. Baltimore–London.
  54. van Tress 2004: van Tress, H. 2004. Poetic Memory. Allusion in the Poetry of Callimachus and the Metamorphoses of Ovid. Leiden–Boston.
  55. Vessey 1970: Vessey, D. 1970. “The Significance of the Myth of Linus and Coroebus in Statius’ Thebaid, I, 557–672.” The American Journal of Philology 91 (3): 315–331.
  56. Vessey 1973: Vessey, D. 1973. Statius and the Thebaid. Cambridge.
  57. von Moisy 1971: von Moisy, S. 1971. Untersuchungen zur Erzählweise in Statius’ Thebais. Bonn.
  58. Weiden Boyd 2002: Weyden Boyd, B. (ed.). 2002. Brill’s Companion to Ovid. Leiden–Boston–Köln.
  59. Williams 1968: Williams, G. 1968. Tradition and Originality in Roman Poetry. Oxford.