Pandarus cytuje Owidiusza w pierwszej księdze „Troilusa i Criseydy” Geoffreya Chaucera

Main Article Content

Antoni Bobrowski

Abstrakt

The medieval epic poem Troilus and Criseyde by Chaucer describes the history of unhappy love with the Trojan War in the background. The story is constructed in the convention of courtly love, and the author draws abundantly from a range of plot motifs preserved in the ancient literary tradition. The article discusses the way of intertextual use of Ovid’s Heroides 5 in the course of events told in Book One of the poem.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Dział
COMMENTATIONES

Bibliografia

  1. Primary sources
  2. Apollodorus. The Library. Vol. 1–2. Tr. by J. G. Frazer. 1921. London and New York.
  3. Callimachus. Calimachus and Lycophron. Tr. by A. W. Mair; Aratus. Tr. by G. R. Mair. 1921. London and New York. .
  4. Chaucer, G. The Complete Works of Geoffrey Chaucer. Vol. II. Ed. by W. W. Skeat. 1900/1963. Oxford.
  5. Chaucer, G. Troilus and Cressida. A Complete Modernisation by A. S. Kline, 2001. Digital edition in Poetry in Translation. Accessed April 11, 2019. https://www.poetryintranslation.com/PITBR/English/TroilusandCressidaBkII.php.
  6. Ovid. Heroides. Select Epistles. Ed. by P. E. Knox. 1995. Cambridge.
  7. Ovid. P. Ovidii Nasonis Epistulae Heroidum. Ed. by H. Dörrie. 1971. Berlin and New York.
  8. Tibullus. Elegies II. Ed., introd. and comm. by P. Murgatroyd. 1994. Oxford.
  9. Secondary sources
  10. Arn 1980: Arn, M.-J. 1980. “Three Ovidian Women in Chaucer’s Troilus: Medea, Helen, Oënone.” The Chaucer Review 15: 1–10.
  11. Butterfield 2004: Butterfield, A. 2004. “Chaucer’s French inheritance.” In The Cambridge Companion to Chaucer. Ed. by P. Boitani and J. Mann, 20–35. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  12. Casali 1992: Casali, S. 1992. “Enone, Apollo pastore e l’amore immedicabile: giochi ovidiani su di un topos elegiac.” Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 28: 85–100.
  13. Cheschire 2005: Cheschire, K. 2005. “Thematic Progression and Unity in Callimachus Hymn to Apollo.” The Classical Journal 100: 331–348.
  14. Copley 1947: Copley, F. O. 1947. “Servitium amoris in the Roman Elegists.” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 78: 285–300.
  15. Eckhardt 2002: Eckhardt, C. D. 2002. “Genre.” In A Companion to Chaucer. Ed. by P. Brown, 180–194. Oxford – Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
  16. Foulon 1980: Foulon, A. 1980. “Tibulle II,3 et l’alexandrinisme.” Revue des Études Latines 58, 252–273.
  17. Fumo 2003: Fumo, J. C. 2003. “«Little Troilus»: Heroides 5 and Its Ovidian Contexts in Chaucer’s Troilus and Criseyde.” Studies in Philology 100: 278–314.
  18. Hanly 2002: Hanly, M. 2002. “France.” In A Companion to Chaucer. Ed. by P. Brown, 149–166. Oxford – Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
  19. Hubbard 2013: Hubbard, T. K. 2013. “The Irreducibility of Myth: Plato’s Phaedrus, Apollo, Admetus, and the Problem of Pederastic Hierarchy.” Phoenix 67: 81–106.
  20. Jacobson 1974: Jacobson, H. 1974. Ovid’s Heroides. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  21. Lewis 1936: Lewis, C. S. 1936/1973. The Allegory of Love. A Study in Medieval Tradition. London: Oxford University Press.
  22. Lyne 1979: Lyne, R. O. A. M. 1979. “Servitium amoris.” The Classical Quarterly 29: 117–130.
  23. Meech 1930: Meech, S. B. 1930. “Chaucer and an Italian Translation of the Heroides.” Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 45: 110–128.
  24. Nolan 1992: Nolan, B. 1992. Chaucer and the Tradition of the Roman Antique. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  25. Solimano 1970: Solimano, G. 1970 “Il mito di Apollo e Admeto negli elegiaci latini.” In Mythos. Scripta in honorem Marii Untersteiner, 255–268. Genova: Università degli studi di Genova.
  26. Wallace 2004: Wallace, D. 2004. “Chaucer’s Italian inheritance.” In The Cambridge Companion to Chaucer. Ed. by P. Boitani, J. Mann, 36–57. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  27. Whitaker 1983: Whitaker, R. 1983. Myth and Personal Experience in Roman Love Elegy. A. Study in Poetic Technique. Göttingen: Vanderhoeck & Ruprecht.
  28. Windeatt 2004: Windeatt, B. 2004. “Literary structures in Chaucer.” In The Cambridge Companion to Chaucer. Ed. by P. Boitani, J. Mann, 214–232. New York: Cambridge University Press.