Abstrakt
The aim of the paper is to present the way in which the grammatical category of number was referred to by the Greeks before its description took the standard shape known particularly from the Τέχνη γραμματική, attributed to Dionysios Thrax. The research in this field shows that it was Aristotle who first pointed to this category in the 20th chapter of his Poetics, where the expression πτῶσις κατὰ τὸ ἑνὶ ἢ πολλοῖς [σημαῖνον] presents it as one of the bases of word variance peculiar to the name (ὄνομα) and verb (ῥῆμα). The next references to the category of number, already designated with the term ἀριθμοί (‘numbers’), are to be found in the Stoic lingustic doctrine. On the one hand, we come across them when specific classes of words (parts of speech) are being described, which is to say the verb (ῥῆμα), defined as a part of speech signifying something relating to one or many [objects], and the article (ἄρθρον), which is described as a part of speech discerning the genders and numbers of names, whereby the category of number was shown from an apecific relative perspective, i.e. as a characteristic of objects, which are implied by the semantics of a verb, and as a characteristic of names, which finds its indicator in the article. On the other hand, within this branch of Stoic logic, which includes discussions about things signified by the language, the syntactic features of the verb’s number (and person), i.e. following (or not) the rules of agreement with the number (and person) of the nominal exponent of the subject of predication, were given the status of a criterion of the classification of predicates expressed by the very verbs; on the basis of this criterion, the predicate of the σύμβαμα kind contrasts with the παρασύμβαμα one.
Bibliografia
Ammonius. In Aristotelis „De interpretatione” commentarius, ed. A. Busse, Berolini 1897 (reprint 2020, De Gruyter). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112361023
Apollonii Dyscoli De constructione libri quattuor (Grammatici Graeci II, 2), ed. G. Uhlig, Lipsiae 1910.
Aristotelis Analytica priora et posteriora, ed. W.D. Ross, Oxford 1964. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00263626
Aristotelis Ars rhetorica, ed. R. Kassel, Berlin 1976.
Aristotelis de arte poetica liber, ed. R. Kassel, Oxford 1965.
Aristotelis Categoriae et liber De interpretatione, ed. L. Minio-Paluello, Oxford 1949. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00259049
Diogenis Laertii Vitae philosophorum, ed. H.S. Long, Oxford 1964.
Dionysii Thracis Ars Grammatica (Grammatici Graeci I, 1), ed. G. Uhlig, Lipsiae 1883 (reprint: Hildesheim 1965).
Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta, ed. J. Arnim, vol. II–III, Lipsiae 1903.
Borowski 2019: A. Borowski, The Stoics on Lekta. All There Is to Say, Oxford 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198842880.001.0001
D’Avino 1975: R. D’Avino, Il posto del ‘numero’ nell economia della πτῶσις aristotelica, „Helicon” 15/16 (1975), 118–129.
Di Benedetto 1958–1959: V. Di Benedetto, Dionisio Trace e la ‘Techne’ a lui attribuita, „Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Serie II” 27 (1958), 169–210; 28 (1959), 87–118.
Di Benedetto 2000: V. Di Benedetto, Dionysius Thrax and the ‘Tekhne Grammatike’, w: History of the Language Sciences, eds. S.Auroux, E.F.K. Koerner, H.-J. Niederehe, K. Versteegh, vol. I, Berlin–New York 2000, 394–400.
Frede 1978: M. Frede, Principles of Stoic Grammar, w: The Stoics (Major Thinkers, ser. 1), ed. J. Rist, Los Angeles 1978, 27–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520339255-004
Frede 1994: M. Frede, The Stoic Notion of Grammatical Case, „Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies” 39 (1994), 13–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-5370.1994.tb00449.x
Hicks 1958: R.D. Hicks, Diogenes Laertius, Lives of Eminent Philosophers, vol. II, London 1958.
Long 1971: A.A. Long, Language and Thought in Stoicism, w: Problems in Stoicism, ed. A.A. Long, London 1971, 75–113.
Sluiter 2000: I. Sluiter, Language and Thought in Stoic Philosophy, w: History of the Language Sciences, eds. S.Auroux, E.F.K. Koerner, H.-J. Niederehe, K. Versteegh, vol. I, Berlin–New York 2000, 375–384.
Swiggers, Wouters 2002: P. Swiggers, A. Wouters, Grammatical Theory in Aristotle’s ‘Poetics’, chapter XX, w: Grammatical Theory and Philosophy of Language in Antiquity, eds. P. Swiggers, A. Wouters, Leuven 2002, 101–120.
Swiggers, Wouters 2015: P. Swiggers, A. Wouters, Description of the Constituent Elements of the (Greek) Language, w: Brill’s Companion to Ancient Greek Scholarship, vol. II, eds. F. Montanari, S. Matthaios, A.Rengakos, Leiden–Boston 2015, 759–797 (stoics 772–780). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004281929_015
Wolanin 2004: H. Wolanin, Fleksja w gramatyce starożytnej Grecji, Kraków 2004.
Wolanin 2009: H. Wolanin, The Origin of the Opposition πτῶσις ὀρθή (εὐθεῖα) -πτώσεις πλάγιαι (casus rectus – casus obliqui) in the Linguistics of Ancient Greece, „Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis” 126 (2009), 149–166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10148-010-0012-y
Woodard 2023: R.D. Woodard, Greek Linguistic Thought and its Roman Reception, w: The Cambridge History of Linguistics, eds. L.R. Vaugh, M. Monville-Burston, J.E. Josef, Cambridge 2023, 102–143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9780511842788.008
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2024 Hubert Wolanin

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.