Keywords
fake news
François Fillon
emotions
rebranding
social media
How to Cite
Abstract
The French politician François Fillon, for a long time considered the frontrunner in the French presidential campaign, saw his strong position crumble to the third in most of the polls, after the circulation of rumors against him and his family also known as Penelopegate. Such rumors were at the heart of the 2017 French and American presidential campaigns. In fact, the terms post truth, fake news and alternative facts could be seen as symbols of the current information crisis, i.e. the mistrust felt by many readers regarding the media. The present study sets out to investigate the argumentation used to deconstruct and reconstruct François Fillon’s ethos after dissemination of such rumors on social media. Drawing on the theoretical framework developed by Amossy (2014 et al.) and Maingueneau (2004 et al.) on the analysis of self-presentation and in particular on the concepts of (re)branding and scenography, we analyze the discursive strategies deployed by discussants in face management of the French politician’s image. Our data include two different genres (tweets and posts on newspaper forums) and our findings corroborate Amossy’s research (2014) on strategies used in such face work management as denial of responsibility (sympathy), victimization (empathy) or face threats against the opponents (anger). We have also observed the use of a catastrophic scenario (fear), which was not present in Amossy’s data.
References
Adam, J.-M. (1999). Linguistique textuelle. Des genres de discours aux textes. Paris : Nathan.
Amossy, R. (dir.) (1999). Images de soi dans le discours. La construction de l’ethos. Lausanne-Paris : Delachaux et Niestlé.
Amossy, R. (2002). Ethos. In Charaudeau, P. & Maingueneau, D. (éd.), Dictionnaire d’Analyse du Discours (pp. 238-240). Paris : Seuil.
Amossy, R. (2010). La présentation de soi. Ethos et identité verbale. Paris : Presses Universitaires de France. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3917/puf.amoss.2010.01
Amossy, R. (2014). L’ethos et ses doubles contemporains. Perspectives disciplinaires. Langage et société, 149 (3), pp. 13-30. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3917/ls.149.0013
Baider, F. (2015). La parole inversée ? Marine Le Pen et son identité-ressource langagière. https://doi.org/10.7202/1035937ar
Barthes, R. (1962). L’ancienne rhétorique. Communications, 16, pp. 172-223.
Benoit, W. L. (1995). Accounts, Excuses, and Apologies: a Theory of Image Restoration Strategies. Albany : University of New York.
Chauvin-Vileno, A. (2002). Ethos et texte littéraire. Vers une problématique de la voix. Semen, 14 [en ligne]. Retrieved from http://semn.revues.org/2509
Eggs, E. (1999). Ethos aristotélicien, conviction et pragmatique moderne. In R. Amossy (éd.), Images de Soi dans le Discours. La construction de l’ethos (pp. 31-59). Lausanne : Delachaux et Niestlé.
Faye, G. (2017). Affaire Fillon : le tueur s’appelle Macron. Publié sur https://fr.novopress.info/204029/affaire-fillon-le-tueur-sappelle-macron-par- guillaume-faye
Goffman, E. (1973) [1959]. La mise en scène de la vie quotidienne, t. I, La Présentation de soi. Paris : Minuit.
Lebaron, F. (2017). Une affaire d’ethos : le cas Fillon et la crise du néolibéralisme. Mémoire des luttes. Retrieved from http://www.medelu.org/Une-affaire-d-ethos-le-cas-Fillon https://doi.org/10.3917/sava.039.0006
Le Bart, C. (2009). L’analyse des livres politiques. Questions de communication [en ligne], 15. Retrieved from http://questionsdecommunication.revues.org/646 ; https://doi.org/10.4000/questionsdecommunication.646
Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B. (2017). Incivility and confrontation in online conflict discourse. Lodz Paper in Pragmatics, 13 (2), pp. 297-312. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1515/lpp-2017-0017
Longhi, J. (2016a). Le tweet politique efficace comme mème textuel : du profilage à viralité. Travaux de
Linguistique, 73 (2). Retrieved from https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01483945/document
Longhi, J. (2016b). Performativité et performance du discours politique de François Fillon. Retrieved from http://www.atlantico.fr/decryptage/performativite-et-performance-discours-politique-francoisfillon-2917207.html
Maingueneau, D. (2004). Le discours littéraire. Paratopie et scène d’énonciation. Paris : Armand Colin.
Perelman, C., Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1992) (5e éd.). Traité de l’Argumentation. La nouvelle rhétorique. Bruxelles : Éditions de l’Université de Bruxelles.
Rastier, F. (2006). Formes sémantiques et textualité. Langages, 163, pp. 99-114. Retrieved from http://www.revue-texto.net/Inedits/Rastier/Rastier_Formes-semantiques.html ; https://doi.org/10.3917/lang.163.0099; https://doi.org/10.3406/lgge.2006.2686
Woerther, F. (2007). L’Ethos aristotélicien. Genèse d’une notion rhétorique. Paris : Vrin.
License
- The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person.The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
- The Author grants the Purchaser non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons. - The Author grants the Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan permission to:
3.1. reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
3.2. send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases. - The Author declares that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Purchaser is entitled and obliged to allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the attributed license pattern Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons. Thereby, the Author entitles all interested parties to use the work, for non-commercial purposes only, under the following conditions:
4.1. acknowledgment of authorship, i.e. observing the obligation to provide, along with the distributed work, information about the author, title, source (link to the original Work, DOI) and of the license itself.
4.2. the derivatives of the Work are subject to the same conditions, i.e. they may be published only based on a licence which would be identical to the one granting access to the original Work. - The University of Adam Mickiewicz in Poznań is obliged to
5.1. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.2. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
Other provisions
- The University of Adam Mickiewicz in Poznań hereby preserves the copyright to the journal as a whole (layout/stylesheet, graphics, cover design, logo etc.)