Attitude first, arguments thereafter
PDF (Français (France))

Keywords

cyberspace
logical fallacy
argumentative subversiveness
false causation

How to Cite

Pirogowska, E. (2017). Attitude first, arguments thereafter. Studia Romanica Posnaniensia, 44(3), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.14746/strop.2017.443.009

Abstract

The paper investigates the challenges posed by argumentation relying on a logical fallacy. The data has been obtained from a genuine interaction found in cyberspace. The aim of the study is to demonstrate that once a line of reasoning is arbitrarily imposed, a conversational schema emerges, even in spite of the fact that the messages are not consistently interlinked.
https://doi.org/10.14746/strop.2017.443.009
PDF (Français (France))

References

Adam, J.-M. (2008). Énonciation et narration. Fragments de rhétorique chiraquienne. In E. Danblon et al. (éds), Argumentation et narration. Édition de l’Université de Bruxelles.

Burger, M., Lugrin, G., Micheli, R., Pahud, S. (2006). Marques linguistiques et manipulation. Mots. Les langages du politique, 81, pp. 9-22.

Greenwald, A. G. (1968). Cognitive learning, cognitive response to persuasion and attitude change. In A. G. Greenwald, T. C. Brock, T. M. Ostrom (éds), Psychological foundations of attitudes (pp. 147-170). New York : Academic Press. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4832-3071-9.50012-X

Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. (2005). Le discours en interaction. Paris : Armand Colin.

Plantin, Ch. (1990). Essais sur l’argumentation. Paris : Kimé.

Plantin, Ch. (1995). L’argument du paralogisme. Hermès, 15 (Argumentation et Rhétorique I), p. 251.

Retrieved from http://documents.irevues.inist.fr/bitstream/handle/2042/15170/HERMES_1995_15_245.pdf?sequence=1

Robrieux, J.-J. (2005). Rhétorique et argumentation. Paris : Armand Colin.

Searle, J. R. (1972). Les actes de langage. Essai de philosophie linguistique. Paris : Hermann.

Vignaux, G. (1988). Enonciation, argumentation et cognition. Paris : Ophrys.