Keywords
grammaticalization
functional change
pragmatic change
How to Cite
Abstract
The starting hypothesis of the article is that the discursive operators of Spanish have not been enabled by grammaticalization processes identical to those of other grammatical components (such as verbal or nominal morphemes or prepositions and conjunctions), since there has been no reduction in the functional scope nor a total bleaching, so that its link with the original lexical items has not disappeared. The consequence is that markers are not integrated into paradigms as closed as grammatical paradigms and both their obsolescence and their renewal, therefore, follow similar patterns to what happens in the evolution of the lexicon. This hypothesis is tried to verify in the article by means of the examination of some discursive markers that, having been used diachronically in Spanish, have been abandoned in
a relatively short time.
References
Barraza Carbajal, G. (2014). Oraciones subordinadas sustantivas de objeto directo. In C. Company Company (ed.), Sintaxis histórica de la lengua española. Tercera parte: Adverbios, preposiciones y conjunciones. Relaciones interoracionales (capítulo 25, vol. 3). México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Fondo de Cultura Económina.
Company Company, C. (2004a). ¿Gramaticalización o desgramticalización? Reanálisis y subjetivización de verbos como marcadores discursivos in la historia del español. RFE, 84, 29-66.
Company Company, C. (2004b). Gramaticalización por subjetivización como prescindibilidad de la sintaxis. NRFH, 52, 1-27.
Correas, G. (1967). Vocabulario de refranes y frases proverbiales. Texte établi par L. Combet. Bordeaux: Féret et fils.
Degand, L. & Evers-Vermeul, J. (2015). Grammaticalization or pragmaticalization of discourse markers? Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 16, 1, 59-85.
Diewald, G. (2002). A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. In I. Wischer & G. Diewald (eds.), New Reflections on Grammaticalization (pp. 103-117). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Diewald, G. (2011). Grammaticalization and pragmaticalization. In H. Narrog & B. Heine (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization (pp. 450-461). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Duque, E. (2016). Las relaciones de discurso. Madrid: Arco/Libros.
Espinosa Elorza, R.M. (1995). Adverbios aditivos en la lengua medieval y clásica. Verba, 22, 585-594.
Estellés Arguedas, M. (2009a). Gramaticalización y gramaticalizaciones. El caso de los marcadores del discurso de digresión en español. Tesis doctoral. Valencia: Universitat de València. Obtenida en <http://roderic.uv.es/handle/10550/15767>.
Estellés Arguedas, M. (2009b). Un caso atípico de gramaticalización: el valor epistémico del marcador por cierto. RILCE, 25, 2, 319-339.
Garcés, G. (1852, 1791). Fundamento del valor y elegancia de la lengua castellana. Madrid: Rivadeneira.
Garcés Gómez, P. (2008). La organización del discurso: marcadores de ordenación y de reformulación. Madrid: Iberoamericana/Vervuert.
Garcés Gómez, P. (2013). La formación y evolución del paradigma de los operadores discursivos matizadores de la verdad del enunciado. In P. Garcés Gómez (ed.), Los adverbios con función discursiva: procesos de formación y evolución (pp. 275-316). Madrid: Iberoamericana/Vervuert.
Garcés Gómez, P. (2014). Diacronía de los marcadores discursivos y representación in un diccionario histórico. La Coruña: Universidade da Coruña.
García de Diego, V. (1968). Diccionario de voces naturales. Madrid: Aguilar.
Ghezzi, Ch. & Molinelli, P. (2014). Deverbal pragmatic markers from Latin to Italian (Lat. QUAESO and It. prego). The cyclic nature of functional developments. In Ch. Ghezzi & P. Molinelli (eds.), Discourse and Pragmatic Markers from Latin to the Romance Languages (pp. 61-85). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Herrero Ingelmo, J.L. (2006-2007). ¿Cómo surgen los conectores: los reformuladores del discurso id est, esto es, es decir? Revista de Lexicografía, 13, 45-54.
Herrero Ruiz de Loizaga, F.J. (2014). Quia, ca, qué va. Elipsis y gramaticalización de elementos interjectivos de negación. In J.L. Girón Alconchel & D.M. Sáez Rivera (eds.), Procesos de gramaticalización in la historia del español (pp. 233-262). Madrid: Iberoamericana/Vervuert.
Hopper, P.J. (1991). On some principles of grammaticization. In E.C. Traugott & H. Bernd (eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization (vol. I, pp. 17-36). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Iliescu, M. (2014). Call markers in French, Italian, and Romanian. In Ch. Ghezzi & P. Molinelli (eds.), Discourse and Pragmatic Markers from Latin to the Romance Languages (pp. 29-40). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lehmann, Ch. (1995). Thoughts on Grammaticalization. München: LINCOM Europa.
Loureda Lamas, Ó. & Acín Viña, E. (eds.) (2010). Los estudios sobre marcadores del discurso en español, hoy. Madrid: Arco/Libros.
Martin Zorraquino, M.A. (1994a). Algunas observaciones sobre claro como operador pragmatico en español actual. In G. Hilty (ed.), Actes du XXe. Congres International de Linguistique et Philologie Romanes, vol. 1 (pp. 467-78). Tübingen: Francke.
Martin Zorraquino, M.A. (1994b). Bueno como operador pragmatico in español actual. In A. Alonso et al. (eds.), II Encuentro de linguistas y filologos de Espana y Mexico (pp. 402-412). Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca.
Martin Zorraquino, M.A. (1998). Dos notas a proposito del Tratado de las particulas de G. Garces (1791). Un precedente in el estudio de los marcadores del discurso. In E. Ramon Trives & H. Provencio Garrigos (eds.), Estudios de lingüística textual. Homenaje al Profesor Muñoz Cortes (pp. 307-315). Murcia: Universidad de Murcia.
Martín Zorraquino, M.A. & Portolés, J. (1999). Los marcadores del discurso. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, vol. III (pp. 4051-4213). Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
Morby, E.S. (1968). Lope de Vega. «La Dorotea». Edición de Edwin S. Morby. Madrid: Castalia.
Nebrija, A. (1946 [1492]). Gramática Castellana. Edición crítica de P. Galindo Romeo y L. Ortiz Muñoz. Madrid: Edición de la Junta del Centenario.
Onodera, N.O. (2011). The Grammaticalization of Discourse Markers. In H. Narrog & B. Heine (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization (pp. 614-624). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pons Bordería, S. (1998). Oye y mira o los límites de la conexión. In M.A. Martín Zorraquino & E. Montolío Durán (eds.), Marcadores del discurso. Teoría y análisis (pp. 213-228). Madrid: Arco/Libros.
Pons Bordería, S. (2008). Gramaticalización por tradiciones discursivas: el caso de esto es. In J. Kabatek (ed.), Sintaxis histórica del español y cambio lingüístico. Nuevas perspectivas desde las Tradiciones Discursivas (pp. 249-274). Madrid/Frankfurt: Iberoamericana/Vervuert.
Pons Bordería, S. (2014). Paths of grammaticalization in Spanish o sea. In Ch. Ghezzi & P. Molinelli (eds.), Discourse and Pragmatic Markers from Latin to the Romance Languages (pp. 109-136). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pons Rodríguez, L. (2010). Los marcadores del discurso in la historia del español. In O. Loureda Lamas & E. Acín Villa (eds.), Los estudios sobre marcadores del discurso in español, hoy (pp. 523-616). Madrid: Arco/Libros.
Portolés, J. (1998). Marcadores discusivos. Barcelona: Ariel.
Real Academia Española, Corpus diacrónico del español (CORDE). Banco de datos CORDE [in línea], .
Ricós Vidal, A. (2008). Locuciones adverbiales con preposición a y adjetivo in el español y el portugués del siglo XVI. Estudio histórico. In Actas del VII Congreso Internacional de la Lengua Española. Mérida (Yucatán). 4-8 de septiembre de 2006 (pp.1035-1054). Madrid: Arco/Libros.
Ricós Vidal, A. (2012). A reculas, a hotas, a sabiendas, a la deshilada, a la callada, a la sorda: más sobre locuciones adverbiales. In A. García Valle et al. (eds.), Fablar bien e tan mesurado: veinticinco años de investigación diacrónica in Valencia: estudios ofrecidos a M. Teresa Echenique Elizondo in conmemoración de su cátedra (pp. 68-86). Valencia: Tirant Humanidades.
Tabor, W. & Traugott, E.C. (1998). Structural scope expansion and grammaticalization. In A. Giancalone Ramat & P.J. Hopper (eds.), The Limits of Grammaticalization (pp. 229-272). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Traugott, E.C. (1995). The role of grammaticalization in the development of discourse markers. Paper presented in ICHL XII Manchester. Disponible en: http://www.stanford.edu/~traugott/papers/discourse.pdf.
Traugott, E.C. & Dasher, R.B. (2001). Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Traugott, E.C. & Heine, B. (eds.) (1991). Approaches to Grammaticalization. Focus on Theoretical and Methodological Issues. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Vázquez Vega, N. (2003). Marcadores discusivos de recepción. Santiago de Compostela: Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.
Villar Díaz, M.B. (2013). La evolución de los adverbios y locuciones adverbiales de modalidad epistémica. In P. Garcés Gómez (ed.), Los adverbios con función discursiva: procesos de formación y evolución (pp. 157-199). Madrid: Iberoamericana/Vervuert
License
- The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person.The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
- The Author grants the Purchaser non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons. - The Author grants the Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan permission to:
3.1. reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
3.2. send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases. - The Author declares that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Purchaser is entitled and obliged to allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the attributed license pattern Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons. Thereby, the Author entitles all interested parties to use the work, for non-commercial purposes only, under the following conditions:
4.1. acknowledgment of authorship, i.e. observing the obligation to provide, along with the distributed work, information about the author, title, source (link to the original Work, DOI) and of the license itself.
4.2. the derivatives of the Work are subject to the same conditions, i.e. they may be published only based on a licence which would be identical to the one granting access to the original Work. - The University of Adam Mickiewicz in Poznań is obliged to
5.1. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.2. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
Other provisions
- The University of Adam Mickiewicz in Poznań hereby preserves the copyright to the journal as a whole (layout/stylesheet, graphics, cover design, logo etc.)