Keywords
intonation
pitch perception
pronunciation learning
How to Cite
Number of views: 848
Number of downloads: 1189
Abstract
The present study seeks to determine whether superior musical hearing is correlated with successful production of second language (L2) intonation patterns. Fifty Polish speakers of English at the university level were recorded before and after an extensive two-semester accent training course in English. Participants were asked to read aloud a series of short dialogues containing different intonation patterns, complete two musical hearing tests measuring tone deafness and melody discrimination, and a survey regarding musical experience. We visually analyzed and assessed participants’ intonation by comparing their F0 contours with the model provided by their accent training teachers following ToBI (Tones and Break Indices) guidelines and compared the results with the musical hearing test scores and the survey responses. The results suggest that more accurate pitch perception can be related to more correct production of L2 intonation patterns as participants with superior musical ear produced more native-like speech contours after training, similar to those of their teachers. After dividing participants into four categories based on their musical hearing test scores and musical experience, we also observed that some students with better musical hearing test scores were able to produce more correct L2 intonation patterns. However, students with poor musical hearing test scores and no musical background also improved, suggesting that the acquisition of L2 intonation in a formal classroom setting can be successful regardless of one’s musical hearing skills.
Funding
This research was supported by the National Science Center in Poland, Grant 2014/ 15/N/HS2/03865. Principal investigator: Mateusz Jekiel. Recipient: Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland.
References
Alexander, J. A., Wang, P. C. M., & Bradlow, A. R. (2005). Lexical tone perception in musicians and non-musicians. Proceedings of Interspeech 2005 (pp. 397-400). https://www.isca-speech.org/archive/pdfs/interspeech_2005/alexander05_interspeech.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2005-271
Aronsson, B. (2014). Prosody in the foreign language classroom - always present, rarely practised? Journal of Linguistics and Language and Teaching, 5, 207-225.
Barbaroux, M., Noreña, A., Rasamimanana, M., Castet, E., & Besson, M. (2020). From psychoacoustics to brain waves: A longitudinal approach to novel word learning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 33(1), 8-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01629
Beckman, M. E., & Elam, G. A. (1997). Guidelines for ToBI labeling, version 3.0. The Ohio State University.
Behroozmand, R., Ibrahim, N., Korzyukov, O., Robin, D. A., & Larson, C. R. (2014). Left-hemisphere activation is associated with enhanced vocal pitch error detection in musicians with absolute pitch. Brain and Cognition, 84(1), 97-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2013.11.007
Bidelman, G. M., & Krishnan, A. (2009). Neural correlates of consonance, dissonance, and the hierarchy of musical pitch in the human brainstem. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(42), 13165-13171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3900-09.2009
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2022). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.3.03. Retrieved December 17, 2022 from http://www.praat.org/
Brugos, A., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & Veilleux, N. (2006). Transcribing prosodic structure of spoken utterances with ToBI. MIT Open Courseware. https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/6-911-transcribing-prosodic-structure-of-spoken-utterances-with-tobi-january-iap-2006/
Chapman, M. (2007). Theory and practice of teaching discourse intonation. ELT Journal 61(1), 3-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccl039
Chen, A., Stevens, C. J., & Kager, R. (2017). Pitch perception in the first year of life, a comparison of lexical tones and musical pitch. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(297), 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00297
Chobert, J., & Besson, M. (2013). Musical expertise and second language learning. Brain Sciences, 3(2), 923-940. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci3020923
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press.
Dankovicová, J., House, J., Crooks, A., & Jones, K. (2007). The relationship between musical skills, music training, and intonation analysis skills. Language and Speech, 50(2), 177-225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309070500020201
Demirezen, M. (2009). An analysis of the problem-causing elements of intonation for Turkish teachers of English. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 2776-2781. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.492
Derwing, T. M. (2008). Curriculum issues in teaching pronunciation to second language learners. In G. H. Edwards & M. L. Zampini (Eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition (pp. 347-369). John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.36.17der
Deutsch, D. (2002). The puzzle of absolute pitch. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(6), 200-204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00200
Draxler, J. Ch., & Jänsch, K. (2019). SpeechRecorder – a universal platform independent multi-channel Audio Recording Software (Version 4.4.50) [Computer software]. https://www.bas.uni-muenchen.de/forschung/Bas/software/speechrecorder/
Dufour, S., & Nguyen, N. (2013). How much imitation is there in a shadowing task? Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00346
Fenk-Oczlon, G., & Fenk, A. (2009). Some parallels between language and music from a cognitive and evolutionary perspective. Musicae Scientiae, 13(2), 201-226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864909013002101
Grabe, E., & Karpinski, M. (2003). Universal and language-specific aspects of intonation in English and Polish. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 1061-1064. https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs/icphs2003
Gussmann, E. (2007). The phonology of Polish. Oxford University Press.
Gut, U. (2009). Non-native speech: A corpus-based analysis of phonological and phonetic properties of L2 English and German. Peter Lang. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783484431225.157
He, X., van Heuven, V., & Gussenhoven, C. (2012). The selection of intonation contours by Chinese L2 speakers of Dutch: Orthographic closure vs. prosodic knowledge. Second Language Research, 28(3), 283-318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658312439668
Intartaglia, B., White-Schwoch, T., Kraus, N., & Schön, D. (2017). Music training enhances the automatic neural processing of foreign speech sounds. Scientific Reports, 7, 1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12575-1
Jekiel, M. (2022). L2 rhythm production and musical rhythm perception in advanced learners of English. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 58(2), 315-340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2022-0016
Jekiel, M., & Malarski, K. (2021). Musical hearing and musical experience in second language English vowel acquisition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 64(5), 1666-1682. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_JSLHR-19-00253
Jentschke, S., & Koelsch, S. (2009). Musical training modulates the development of syntax processing in children. NeuroImage, 47, 735-744. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.090
Kang, O. (2013). Relative impact of pronunciation features on ratings of non-native speakers’ oral proficiency. In J. Levis & K. LeVelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference (pp. 10-15). Iowa State University.
Kurt, B., Medlin, J., & Tessarolo, A. (2014). The perception of prosodically ambiguous intonation patterns by L2 English learners and the effects of instruction. Concordia Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 5, 354-372.
Lemhöfer, K., & Broersma, M. (2012). Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid Lexical Test for Advanced Learners of English. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 325-343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0146-0
Magne, C., Schön, D., & Besson, M. (2006). Musician children detect pitch violations in both music and language better than nonmusician children: Behavioral and electrophysiological approaches. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(2), 199-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2006.18.2.199
Mandell, J. (2009). Music tests. Jake Mandell, MD. http://jakemandell.com/
Marie, C., Delogu, F., Lampis, G., Belardinelli, M. O., & Besson, M. (2010). Influence of musical expertise on segmental and tonal processing in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 2701-2715. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2010.21585
Mennen, I. (2004). Bi-directional interference in the intonation of Dutch speakers of Greek. Journal of Phonetics, 32, 543-563. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2004.02.002
Mikoś, M. J. (1976). Intonation of questions in Polish. Journal of Phonetics, 4(3), 247-253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)31247-1
Milovanov, R., Pietilä, P., Tervaniemi, M., & Esquef, P. A. (2010). Foreign language pronunciation skills and musical aptitude: A study of Finnish adults with higher education. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 56-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.11.003
Mitterer, H., & Müsseler, J. (2013). Regional accent variation in the shadowing task: Evidence for a loose perception–action coupling in speech. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75, 557-575. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-012-0407-8
Moreno, S., & Besson, M. (2006). Influence of musical training on pitch processing: Event-related brain potential studies of adults and children. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1060, 93-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1360.054
Ning, L. (2020). Musical memory and pitch discrimination abilities as correlates of vocal pitch control for speakers with different tone and musical experiences. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Speech Prosody 2020, 611-615. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2020-125
Nooteboom, S. (1997). The prosody of speech: Melody and rhythm. In J. Laver & W. J. Hardcastle (Eds.), The handbook of phonetic sciences (pp. 640-673). Blackwell Publishers.
Ott, C. G. M., & and Jäncke, L. (2013). Processing of self-initiated speech-sounds is different in musicians. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00041
Palomar-García, M. Á., Olcina-Sempere, G., Hernández, M., Parcet, M. A., Mandell, J., & Ávila, C. (2020). The Jake Mandell test as a measure of individual differences in pitch discrimination: Validity and reliability properties. Revista Electrónica Complutense de Investigación en Educación Musical, 17, 143-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/reciem.66326
Pastuszek-Lipińska, B. (2008). Musicians outperform nonmusicians in speech imitation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4969, 56-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85035-9_4
Patel, A. D. (2008). Music, language, and the brain. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195123753.001.0001
Patel, A. D., Foxton, J. M., & Griffiths, T. D. (2005). Musically tone-deaf individuals have difficulty discriminating intonation contours extracted from speech. Brain and Cognition, 59, 310-313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2004.10.003
Pijper, J. R. de. (1983). Modelling British English intonation. Foris Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110883510
Roach, P. (2000). English phonetics and phonology: A practical course. (3rd ed.) Cambridge University Press.
Schön, D., Magne, C., & Besson, M. (2004). The music of speech: Music training facilitates pitch processing in both music and language. Psychophysiology, 41(3), 341-349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.00172.x
Schön, D., Gordon, R., Campagne, A., Magne, C., Astésano, C., Anton, J., & Besson, M. (2010). Similar cerebral networks in language, music and song perception. NeuroImage, 51, 450-461. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.023
Seashore, C. E., Lewis, D., & Saetveit, J. (1960). Seashore measures of musical talents. Psychological Corporation.
Slevc, L., & Miyake, A. (2006). Individual differences in second language proficiency: Does musical ability matter? Psychological Science, 17, 675-681. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01765.x
Wallentin, M., Nielsen, A. H., Friis-Olivarius, M., Vuust, C., & Vuust, P. (2010). The musical ear test, a new reliable test for measuring musical competence. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 188-196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.02.004
Weckwerth, J, Janicka, K., Dziubalska-Kołaczyk K., Scheuer S., Wolfram-Romanowska, D., & Kul, M. (2006). Native standards or non-native ELF: Which English to teach in the 21st century? In K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk (Ed.), IFAtuation: A life in IFA. A festschrift for Professor Jacek Fisiak on the occasion of his 70th birthday (pp. 235-259). Adam Mickiewicz University Press.
Wells, J. C. (2014). English intonation: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Willems, N. (1982). English intonation from a Dutch point of view. Foris Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110853469
Wong, P., & Perrachione, T. (2007). Learning pitch patterns in lexical identification by native English-speaking adults. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28(4), 565-585. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716407070312
Wong, P. C., Skoe, E., Russo, N. M., Dees, T., & Kraus, N. (2007). Musical experience shapes human brainstem encoding of linguistic pitch patterns. Nature Neuroscience, 10(4), 420-422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1872
Zarate, J. M., Ritson, C. R., & Poeppel, D. (2012). Pitch interval discrimination and musical expertise: Is the semitone a perceptual boundary? The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 132, 984-993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4733535
Zatorre, R. J., & Baum, S. R. (2012). Musical melody and speech intonation: Singing a different tune. PLoS Biology, 10(7), 1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001372
Zybert, J., & Stępień, S. (2009). Musical intelligence and foreign language learning. Research in Language, 7, 99-111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10015-009-0007-4
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Mateusz Jekiel, Kamil Malarski
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.