Keywords
bibliometric analysis
content analysis
vocabulary
gender ideology
How to Cite
Number of views: 510
Number of downloads: 219
Abstract
Using high-quality articles obtained from the Web of Science Core Collection, this paper seeks to offer an overview of research on ELT textbook content spanning from 2003 to 2022. We first identify publication trends, prolific journals, highly cited papers, and influential references. Then, we code the collected data across four dimensions: research topics, analytical tools, textbook types, and textbook levels. Key findings reveal that there is growing academic interest in this field, with vocabulary and gender ideology as prominent themes, alongside emerging topics like task, linguistic complexity, and environmental values; and we find that corpus-based and (critical) content analyses are widely used methods. Furthermore, the distribution of research efforts appears uneven across primary school, secondary school, and university levels, as well as in the study of general English textbooks and English textbooks for specific purposes. This paper will be valuable for stakeholders involved in ELT textbook development, particularly those new to the field and seeking guidance on current research trends, methodological approaches, and emerging themes in textbook content analysis.
References
Atkinson, D. (2024). Reconciling opposites to reach compromise during ELT textbook development. Language Teaching Research, 28(5), 1976-1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211040201
Babaii, E., & Sheikhi, M. (2018). Traces of neoliberalism in English teaching materials: A critical discourse analysis. Critical Discourse Studies, 15(3), 247-264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2017.1398671
Baker, P. (2023). Using corpora in discourse analysis (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350083783
Barrot, J. S. (2019). Examining the task complexity in ELT coursebooks. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(6), 469-481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00448-2
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Longman.
Bori, P. (2018). Language textbooks in the era of neoliberalism. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315405544
Butler, Y. G., Kang, K. I., Kim, H., & Liu, Y. (2018). “Tasks” appearing in primary school textbooks. ELT Journal, 72(3), 285-295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccx056
Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Multilingual Matters.
Calafato, R. (2019). Policies, textbooks, and curriculum constraints to integrating literature into language education: EFL teacher perspectives from Russia. Pedagogika, 132(4), 178-196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15823/p.2018.132.11
Calafato, R., & Gudim, F. (2022). Literature in contemporary foreign language school textbooks in Russia: Content, approaches, and readability. Language Teaching Research, 26(5), 826-846. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820917909
Canale, G. (2016). (Re)searching culture in foreign language textbooks, or the politics of hide and seek. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 29(2), 225-243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2016.1144764
Chaltiel, D. (2023). Crosstable: Crosstables for descriptive analyses [Computer software]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=crosstable
Chen, Y. (2010). The semiotic construal of attitudinal curriculum goals: Evidence from EFL textbooks in China. Linguistics and Education, 21(1), 60-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2009.12.005
Chong, S. W., & Plonsky, L. (2024). A typology of secondary research in Applied Linguistics. Applied Linguistics Review, 15(4), 1569-1594. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2022-0189
Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213-238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3587951
Curdt-Christiansen, X. L. (Ed.). (2015). Language, ideology and education: The politics of textbooks in language education. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315814223
Dahmardeh, M., & Kim, S.-D. (2020). Gender representation in Iranian English language coursebooks: Is sexism still alive? English Today, 36(1), 12-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078419000117
Dijk, T. A. van. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. Sage.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.
Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Foroutan, Y. (2012). Gender representation in school textbooks in Iran: The place of languages. Current Sociology, 60(6), 771-787. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392112459744
Fuchs, E., & Bock, A. (Eds.). (2018). The Palgrave handbook of textbook studies. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53142-1
Gaard, G. (2008). Toward an ecopedagogy of children’s environmental literature. Green Theory & Praxis Journal, 4(2), 11-24.
Guo, N. S., & Feng, D. (2015). Infusing multiliteracies into English language curriculum: The visual construction of knowledge in English textbooks from an ontogenetic perspective. Linguistics and Education, 31, 115-129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2015.07.001
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771
Harmer, J. (2015). The practice of English language teaching (5th ed.). Pearson Education.
Harwood, N. (2014a). Content, consumption, and production: Three levels of textbook research. In N. Harwood (Ed.), English language teaching textbooks: Content, consumption, production (pp. 1-41). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137276285_1
Harwood, N. (Ed.). (2014b). English language teaching textbooks: Content, consumption, production. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137276285
Harwood, N. (2022). Research in materials development: What, how, and why? In J. Norton & H. Buchanan (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of materials development for language teaching (pp. 139-154). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/b22783-13
Hoang, H., & Crosthwaite, P. (2024). A comparative analysis of multiword units in the reading and listening input of English textbooks. System, 121, 103224-103238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103224
Howatt, A. P. R., & Widdowson, H. G. (2004). A history of English language teaching (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Hsu, W. (2014). The most frequent opaque formulaic sequences in English-medium college textbooks. System, 47, 146-161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.10.001
Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. (Kevin). (2021). A bibliometric study of EAP research: Who is doing what, where and when? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 49, 100929. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100929
Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. (Kevin). (2024). Metadiscourse: The evolution of an approach to texts. Text and Talk, 44(3), 411-433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2021-0156
Jackson, J. C., & Medvedev, D. (2024). Worldwide divergence of values. Nature Communications, 15(1), 2650. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-46581-5
Jin, T., Lu, X., & Ni, J. (2020). Syntactic complexity in adapted teaching materials: Differences among grade levels and implications for bench-marking. Modern Language Journal, 104(1), 192-208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12622
Kachru, B. B. (1992). World Englishes: Approaches, issues and resources. Language Teaching, 25(1), 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800006583
Keles, U., & Yazan, B. (2023). Representation of cultures and communities in a global ELT textbook: A diachronic content analysis. Language Teaching Research, 27(5), 1325-1346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820976922
Kim, M., & Lu, X. (2024). Exploring the potential of using ChatGPT for rhetorical move-step analysis: The impact of prompt refinement, few-shot learning, and fine-tuning. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 71, 101422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101422
Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford University Press.
Kress, G. R., & Leeuwen, T. V. (2021). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (3rd ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003099857
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878781
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2012). Individual identity, cultural globalization, and teaching English as an international language: The case for an epistemic break. In L. Alsagoff, S. L. McKay, G. Hu, & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Principles and practices for teaching English as an international language (pp. 9-27). Routledge.
Lam, P. W. Y. (2010). Discourse particles in corpus data and textbooks: The case of well. Applied Linguistics, 31(2), 260-281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp026
Le Foll, E. (2023). The potential impact of EFL textbook language on learner English: A triangulated corpus study. In K. Harrington & P. Ronan (Eds.), Demystifying corpus linguistics for English language teaching (pp. 259-287). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11220-1_13
Lee, J. F. K. (2019). In the pursuit of a gender-equal society: Do Japanese EFL textbooks play a role? Journal of Gender Studies, 28(2), 204-217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2018.1423956
Lee, J. F. K., & Collins, P. (2010). Construction of gender: A comparison of Australian and Hong Kong English language textbooks. Journal of Gender Studies, 19(2), 121-137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09589231003695856
Lei, L., & Liu, D. (2019). Research trends in applied linguistics from 2005 to 2016: A bibliometric analysis and its implications. Applied Linguistics, 40(3), 540-561. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy003
Liu, Y., Zhang, L. J., & May, S. (2022). Dominance of Anglo-American cultural representations in university English textbooks in China: A corpus linguistics analysis. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 35(1), 83-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2021.1941077
Maxwell-Reid, C., & Lau, K. (2016). Genre and technicality in analogical explanations: Hong Kong’s English language textbooks for junior secondary science. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 23, 31-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.05.005
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524759
Nekrasova-Beker, T. M. (2019). Discipline-specific use of language patterns in engineering: A comparison of published pedagogical materials. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 41, 100774-100786. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100774
Nguyen, C.-D. (2021). Lexical features of reading passages in English-language textbooks for Vietnamese high-school students: Do they foster both content and vocabulary gain? RELC Journal, 52(3), 509-522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688219895045
Nizamani, A., & Shah, W. A. (2022). Textbooks as “neoliberal artifacts”: A critical study of knowledge-making in ELT industry. Critical Discourse Studies, 21(3), 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2022.2160364
Northbrook, J., & Conklin, K. (2018). “What are you talking about?”: An analysis of lexical bundles in Japanese junior high school textbooks. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 23(3), 311-334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.16024.nor
Pennycook, A. (2022). Critical applied linguistics in the 2020s. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 19(1), 1-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2022.2030232
Plonsky, L. (2023). Introduction to the special issue on Introducing biblio-metrics in applied linguistics. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 13(4), 721-726. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.40213
Porreca, K. L. (1984). Sexism in current ESL textbooks. TESOL Quarterly, 18(4), 705-724. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3586584
Qin, J., & Lei, L. (2022). Research trends in task-based language teaching: A bibliometric analysis from 1985 to 2020. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 12(3), 381-404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2022.12.3.3
R Core Team (2024). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
Rathert, S., & Cabaroğlu, N. (2021). Teachers as slaves or masters to their coursebooks: An in-depth study on two English language teachers’ coursebook utilization. Language Teaching Research, 28(5), 1816-1841. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211036239
Reda, G. (2003). English coursebooks: Prototype texts and basic vocabulary norms. ELT Journal, 57(3), 260-268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/57.3.260
Ren, W., & Han, Z. (2016). The representation of pragmatic knowledge in recent ELT textbooks. ELT Journal, 70(4), 424-434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccw010
Richards, J. C. (2006). Materials development and research – Making the connection. RELC Journal, 37(1), 5-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688206063470
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024532
Risager, K. (2018). Representations of the world in language textbooks. Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/RISAGE9559
Schimtt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Sharma, B. K. (2020). Greenspeak in tourism encounters and implications for sustainable TESOL. In J. Goulah & J. Katunich (Eds.), TESOL and sustainability: English language teaching in the Anthropocene era (pp.133-151). Bloomsbury. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350115118.ch-006
Siegel, A. (2014). What should we talk about? The authenticity of textbook topics. ELT Journal, 68(4), 363-375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccu012
Syairofi, A., Mujahid, Z., Mustofa, M., Ubaidillah, M. F., & Namaziandost, E. (2023). Emancipating SLA findings to inform EFL textbooks: A look at Indonesian school English textbooks. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 32(2), 177-188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-022-00642-9
Tomlinson, B. (2012). Materials development for language learning and teaching. Language Teaching, 45(2), 143-179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000528
United Nations. (2016). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https://undocs.org/en/A/70/L.1
Waltman, L. (2016). A review of the literature on citation impact indicators. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 365-391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007
Webb, S. (2007). The effects of repetition on vocabulary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 46-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml048
Weninger, C. (2021). Multimodality in critical language textbook analysis. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 34(2), 133-146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2020.1797083
Wickham, H., Averick, M., Bryan, J., Chang, W., McGowan, L. D., François, R., Grolemund, G., Hayes, A., Henry, L., Hester, J., Kuhn, M., Pedersen, T. L., Miller, E., Bache, S. M., Müller, K., Ooms, J., Robinson, D., Seidel, D. P., Spinu, V., . . . Yutani, H. (2019). Welcome to the tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(43), 1686. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686
Widodo, H. P. (2018). A critical micro-semiotic analysis of values depicted in the Indonesian ministry of national education-endorsed secondary school English textbook. In H. P. Widodo, M. R. Perfecto, L. V. Canh, & A. Buripakdi (Eds.), Situating moral and cultural values in ELT materials: The Southeast Asian context (pp. 131-152). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63677-1_8
Widodo, H. P., Perfecto, M. R., Van Canh, L., & Buripakdi, A. (Eds.). (2018). Situating moral and cultural values in ELT materials. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63677-1
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2015). Methods of critical discourse analysis (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Wood, D. C., & Appel, R. (2014). Multiword constructions in first year business and engineering university textbooks and EAP textbooks. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 15, 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2014.03.002
Xiong, T., Feng, D., & Hu, G. (Eds.). (2022). Cultural knowledge and values in English language teaching materials: (Multimodal) representations and stakeholders. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1935-0
Xu, Y., Zhuang, J., Blair, R., Kim, A. I., Li, F., Hernández, R. T., & Plonsky, L. (2023). Modeling quality and prestige in applied linguistics journals: A bibliometric and synthetic analysis. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 13(4), 755-779. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.40215
Yang, L., & Coxhead, A. (2022). A corpus-based study of vocabulary in the new concept English textbook series. RELC Journal, 53(3), 597-611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220964162
Yıldız, A., & Harwood, N. (2023). Why TESOL textbooks are the way they are: The constraints of writing for a global audience. TESOL Quarterly, 58(2), 909-931. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3261
Yu, D., Li, L., Su, H., & Fuoli, M. (2024). Assessing the potential of LLM-assisted annotation for corpus-based pragmatics and discourse analysis: The case of apology. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 29(4), 534-561. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.23087.yu
Yuen, K. (2011). The representation of foreign cultures in English textbooks. ELT Journal, 65(4), 458-466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccq089
Zahoor, M., & Janjua, F. (2020). Green contents in English language textbooks in Pakistan: An ecolinguistic and ecopedagogical appraisal. British Educational Research Journal, 46(2), 321-338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3579
Zhang, X. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of second language acquisition between 1997 and 2018. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(1), 199-222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000573
Zhao, W. X., Zhou, K., Li, J., Tang, T., Wang, X., Hou, Y., Min, Y., Zhang, B., Zhang, J., Dong, Z., Du, Y., Yang, C., Chen, Y., Chen, Z., Jiang, J., Ren, R., Li, Y., Tang, X., Liu, Z., . . . Wen, J.-R. (2023). A survey of large language models. arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.18223
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jinfen Xu, Fan Ye
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.