Abstract
The current study draws on synthetic techniques and bibliometric analysis to explore the patterns of scientific collaboration in light of methodological orientations. We examined 3,992 applied linguistics (AL) articles published in 18 top-tier journals from 2009 to 2018 and analyzed their methodological orientations and scientific collaboration. Considering that the number of co-authored papers outweighs single-authored counterparts, our results revealed that the overall degree of collaboration for AL journals was moderate-to-high (57.7%). In particular, quantitative studies contained the highest degree of collaboration (66.8%). This was followed by systematic reviews (60.9%), and mixed-methods approach (55.7%). Country-wise, our overall findings further indicated that the United States and the United Kingdom were the two main hubs of collaborative activities for quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods research. While the USA was the top country in systematic reviews like all other research approaches, the UK was the fifth country in systematic reviews. As for collaborating authors, our findings demonstrated that the most influential quantitative researchers had collaborated on Natural Language Processing (NLP) and data mining. While the mixed-methods researchers had a tendency to collaborate on conceptual issues subscribing to the language testing and assessment strand, the most productive qualitative researchers had collaborated on L2 writing issues. Implications for applied linguistics research are further discussed.
References
Ajiferuke, I., Burell, Q., & Tague, J. (1988). Collaborative coefficient: A single measure of the degree of collaboration in research. Scientometrics, 14, 421-433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017100
Alise, M., & Teddlie, C. (2010). A continuation of the paradigm wars? Prevalence rates of methodological approaches across the social/behavioral sciences. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(2), 103-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689809360805
Amini Farsani, M., & Babaii, E. (2020). Applied linguistics research in three decades: A methodological synthesis of graduate theses in an EFL context. Quality & Quantity, 54, 1257-1283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-00984-w
Amini Farsani, M., & Babaii, E., Beikmohammadi, M., & Babaii Farsani, M. (2022). Mixed‑methods research proficiency for applied linguists: A PLS‑path modelling approach. Quality & Quantity, 56, 3337-3362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01268-7
Amini Farsani, M., Jamali, H. R., Beikmohammadi, M., Daneshvar Ghorbani, B., & Soleimani, L. (2021). Methodological orientations, academic citations, and scientific collaboration in applied linguistics: What do research syn-thesis and bibliometrics indicate? System, 100, 102547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102547
Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines (2nd ed.). Open University Press.
Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320887
Bryman, A. (2007). Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 8-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906290531
Byrnes, H. (2013). Notes from the editor. Modern Language Journal, 97, 825-827. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12051.x
Cooper, H. (2016). Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach. SAGE Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878644
de Bot, K. (2015). A history of applied linguistics: From 1980 to the present. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315743769
Fayyad, U., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., & Smyth, P. (1996). From data mining to knowledge discovery in databases. AI Magazine, 17(3), 37-54.
Gazni, A., Sugimoto, C. R., & Didegah, F. (2011). Mapping world scientific collaboration: Authors, institutions, and countries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(2), 323-335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21688
Guba, E. E. (1990). The paradigm dialog. Sage.
Guetterman, T. C. (2017). What distinguishes a novice from an expert mixed methods researcher? Quality and Quantity, 51(1), 377-398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0310-9
Harding, H. (1993). The concept of “Greater China”: Themes, variations and reservations. The China Quarterly, 136, 660-686. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S030574100003229X
Harkins, S. G., & Petty, R. E. (1982). Effects of task difficulty and task uniqueness on social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1214-1229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.6.1214
Hashemi, M. R. (2020). Expanding the scope of mixed methods research in applied linguistics. In J. McKinley & H. Rose (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of research methods in applied linguistics (pp. 39-51). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367824471-4
Hilario, C. M., & Grácio, M. C. C. (2017). Scientific collaboration in Brazilian re-searches: A comparative study in the information science, mathematics and dentistry fields. Scientometrics, 113(2), 929-950. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2498-4
Hill, Ch., Khoo, S., & Hsieh, Y-C. (2020) An investigation into the learning transfer of English for specific academic purposes (ESAP) writing skills of students in Singapore. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 48, 100908. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100908
Hyland, K. (2016). Methods and methodologies in second language writing research. System, 59, 116-125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.05.002
Jang, E. E., Wagner, M., & Park, G. (2014). Mixed methods research in language testing and assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 34, 123-153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190514000063
King, K. L., & Mackey, A. (2016). Research methodology in second language studies: Trends, concerns, and new directions. Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 209-227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12309
Lei, L., & Liu, D. (2019). Research trends in applied linguistics from 2005 to 2016: A bibliometric analysis and its implications. Applied Linguistics, 40, 540-561. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy003
Letsky, M., Warner, N., Fiore, S., & Smith, C. A. P. (Eds.). (2008). Macrocognition in teams: Theories and methodologies. Ashgate.
McKinley, J. (2020). Theorizing research methods in the golden age of applied linguistics research. In J. McKinley & H. Rose (Eds.), The Routledge hand-book of research methods in applied linguistics (pp. 1-13). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367824471-1
Nikzad, M., Jamali, H. R., & Hariri, N. (2011). Patterns of Iranian co-authorship networks in social sciences: A comparative study. Library and Information Science Research, 33(4), 313-319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2011.01.005
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Wilcox, R., Gonzales, V., Hoisington, S., Lambert, J., Jordan, J., Aleisa, M., Benge, C., Wachsmann, M., & Valle, R. (2018). Collaboration patterns among mixed researchers: A multidisciplinary examination. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 10(1), 437-457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29034/ijmra.v10n1a30
Pan, R. K., Kasi, K., & Fortunato, S. (2012). World citation and collaboration networks: Uncovering the role of geography in science. Scientific Reports, 2(902), 2-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00902
Pelaez-Morales, C. (2017). Short communication: L2 writing scholarship in JSLW: An updated report of research published between 1992-2015. Journal of Second Language Writing, 38, 9-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.09.001
Plonsky, L. (2013). Study quality in SLA: An assessment of designs, analyses, and reporting practices in quantitative L2 research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 655-687. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263113000399
Plonsky, L. (2014). Study quality in quantitative L2 research (1990-2010): A methodological synthesis and call for reform. Modern Language Journal, 98, 450-470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2014.12058.x
Plonsky, L. (2017). Quantitative research methods. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 505-521). Taylor and Francis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315676968-28
Plonsky, L., Oswald, F. L. (2015). Meta-analyzing second language research. In L. Plonsky (Ed.), Advancing quantitative methods in second language re-search (pp. 106-128). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315870908-6
Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348-349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026482
Riazi, A. M., Ghanbar, H., & Fazel, I. (2020). The contexts, theoretical and methodological orientation of EAP research: Evidence from empirical articles published in the Journal of English for Academic Purposes. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 48, 100925. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100925
Riazi, A. M., Shi, L., & Haggerty, J. (2018). Analysis of the empirical research in the Journal of Second Language Writing at its 25th year (1992-2016). Journal of Second Language Writing, 41, 41-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.07.002
Sonnenwald, D. H. (2007). Scientific collaboration. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41(1), 643-681. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2007.1440410121
Subramanyam, K. (1983). Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: A re-view. Journal of Information Science, 6, 33-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016555158300600105
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010) VOSViewer: Visualizing scientific landscapes [Software]. Available from https://www.vosviewer.com
Wachsmann, M. S., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Hoisington, S., Gonzales, V., Wilcox, R., Valle, R., & Aleisa, M. (2019). Collaboration patterns as a function of re-search experience among mixed researchers: A mixed methods bibliometric study. The Qualitative Report, 24(12), 2954-2979. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3852
Wagner, C.S., Brahmakulam, I., Jackson, B., Wong, A., & Yoda, T. (2001). Science and technology collaboration: Building capacities in developing countries. RAND.
Warschauer, M., Yim, S., Lee, H., & Zheng, B. B. (2019). Recent contributions of data mining to language learning research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 39, 93-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190519000023
World Bank. (2019). Global financial development report 2019/2020: Bank regulation and supervision a decade after the global financial crisis. The World Bank.
Zhang, X. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of second language acquisition be-tween 1997 and 2018. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(1), 199-222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000573
Zhao, J. J., Beckett, G., & Wang, L. L. (2017). Evaluating the research quality of education journals in China: Implications for increasing global impact in peripheral countries. Review of Educational Research, 87(3), 583-618. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317690813
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Mohammad Amini Farsani, Hamid R. Jamali
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.