Keywords
co-citation analysis
L2 listening learning
L2 listening teaching
research trends
How to Cite
Number of views: 423
Number of downloads: 673
Abstract
This bibliometric study examined the development of research on the learning and teaching of second language (L2) listening from 1948 to 2020 (73 years). Specifically, the study involved: (1) a search and analysis of all the noun phrases to identify important research topics in the abstracts of the published journal articles on L2 listening over the 73 years (divided into three periods) using self-made Python scripts and (2) three co-citation analyses of the references in these articles regarding highly cited authors, publications, and journals, respectively, via the VOSviewer program. The keyword/phrase analysis produced results that helped uncover and delineate the research trends in L2 listening across the three time periods. The co-citation analyses identified the most highly cited authors, publications, and journals as well as the interrelations among the most highly cited items in each of the three categories illustrated with network maps. The results of the analyses and their implications are discussed.
References
Amini Farsani, M., Jamali, H. R., Beikmohammadi, M., Ghorbani, B. D., & Soleimani, L. (2021). Methodological orientations, academic citations, and scientific collaboration in applied linguistics: What do research synthesis and bibliometrics indicate? System, 100, 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102547
Bar-Ilan, J. (2008). Which h-index?: A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar. Scientometrics, 74(2), 257-271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-0216-y
Buck, G. (2001). Assessing listening. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511732959
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approach-es to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/I.1.1
Chang, C. S., & Read, J. (2006). The effects of listening support on the listening performance of EFL learners. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 375-397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/40264527
Chou, M. H. A. (2013). A content-based approach to teaching and testing listening skills to grade 5 EFL learners. International Journal of Listening, 27, 172-185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2013.822270
Clarivate Analytics, (2020). Journal citation reports (Social sciences edition). https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/solutions/journal-citation-reports/
Cole, F. J., & Eales, N. B. (1917). The history of comparative anatomy: Part 1: A statistical analysis of the literature. Science Progress, 11/43, 578-596.
De Bellis, N. (2009). Bibliometrics and citation analysis: From the science citation index to cybermetics. Scarecrow Press.
Ellegaard, O. (2018). The application of bibliometric analysis: Disciplinary and user aspects. Scientometrics, 116, 181-202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2765-z
Feyten, C. M. (1991). The power of listening ability: An overlooked dimension in language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 75, 173-180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1991.tb05348.x
Field, J. (2004). An insight into listeners’ problem: Too much bottom-up or too much top-down? System, 32, 363-377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.05.002
Field, J. (2008). Listening in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511575945
Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes for science: A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science, 122, 108-111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.122.3159.108
Garfield, E. (2007). The evolution of the science citation index. International Microbiology, 10, 65-69.
Goh, C. A. (2000). Cognitive perspective on language learners’ listening comprehension problems. System, 28, 55-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00060-3
Goh, C. (2002). Exploring listening comprehension tactics and their interaction patterns. System, 30(2), 185-206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00004-0
Goh, C., & Taib, Y. (2006). Metacognitive instruction in listening for young learners. ELT Journal, 60(3), 222-232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccl002
Graham, S. (2006). Listening comprehension: The learners’ perspective. System, 34, 165-182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2005.11.001
Graham, S., & Macaro, E. (2008). Strategy instruction in listening for lower-intermediate learners of French. Language Learning, 58(4), 747-783. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00478.x
Honnibal, M., & Johnson, M. (2015). An improved non-monotonic transition system for dependency parsing. In L. Màrquez, C. Callison-Burch, & J. Su (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 1373-1378). Association for Computational Linguistics. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D15-1162
Huan, C., & Guan, X. (2020). Sketching landscapes in discourse analysis (1978-2018): A bibliometric study. Discourse Studies, 22, 697-719. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445620928814
Hulstijn, J. (2003). Connectionist models of language processing and the training of listening skills with the aid of multimedia software. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16, 413-425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1076/call.16.5.413.29488
Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. (2021a). A bibliometric study of EAP research: Who is doing what, where and when? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 49, 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100929
Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. (2021b). Delivering relevance: The emergence of ESP as a discipline. English for Specific Purposes, 64, 13-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2021.06.002
Lei, L., Deng, Y., & Liu, D. (2020). Examining research topics with a dependency-based noun phrase extraction method: A case in accounting. Library Hi Tech. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-12-2019-0247
Lei, L., & Liao, S. (2017). Publications in linguistics journals from Mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Macau (2003-2012): A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics. 24, 54-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2016.1260274
Lei, L., & Liu, D. (2019). Research trends in applied linguistics from 2005 to 2016: A bibliometric analysis and its implications. Applied Linguistics, 40(3), 540-561. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy003
Leydesdorff, L. (2005). The scientific impact of China. Scientometrics, 63, 411-412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0231-1
Leydesdorff, L., & Wagner, C. (2009). Is the United States losing ground in science? A global perspective on the world science system. Scientometrics, 78, 23-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-1830-4
Liu, Y., & Hu, G. (2021). Mapping the field of English for specific purposes (1980-2018): A co-citation analysis. English for Specific Purposes, 61, 97-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2020.10.003
Liu, W., Hu, G., Tang, L., & Wang, Y. (2015). China’s global growth in social science research: Uncovering evidence from bibliometric analyses of SSCI publications (1978-2013). Journal of Informetrics, 9, 555-569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.05.007
Lund, R. J. (1991). A comparison of second language listening and reading comprehension. Modern Language Journal, 75(2), 196-204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1991.tb05350.x
Mendelsohn, D. J. (2001). Listening comprehension: We’ve come a long way, but … Contact, 27, 33-40.
Moiwo, J., & Tao, F. (2013). The changing dynamics in citation index publication position China in a race with the USA for global leadership. Scientometrics, 95, 1031-1050. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0846-y
Nation, I. S. P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 59-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.63.1.59
Pan, Y., Tsai, T., Huang, Y., & Liu, D. (2018). Effects of expanded vocabulary support on listening comprehension. Language Teaching Research, 22, 189-207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816668895
Pao, M. L., & Worthen, D. B. (1989). Retrieval effectiveness by semantic and citation searching. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40(4), 226-235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(198907)40:4<226::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-6
Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25, 348-349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026482
Rayson, P., & Garside, R. (2000). Comparing corpora using frequency profiling. In A. Kilgarriff & T. B. Sardinha (Eds.), Proceedings of the workshop on comparing corpora (pp. 1-6). Association for Computational Linguistics. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3115/1117729.1117730
Richards, J. C. (2005). Second thoughts on teaching listening. RELC Journal, 36, 85-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688205053484
Rost, M. (1990). Listening in language learning. Longman.
Rost, M. (2002). Teaching and researching listening. Longman.
Rubin, J. (1994). A review of second language listening comprehension re-search. Modern Language Journal, 78(2), 199-221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02034.x
Salton, G. (1971). Automatic indexing using bibliographic citations. Journal of Documentation, 27(2), 98-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026511
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing bibliometric networks. In Y. Ding, R. Rousseau, & D. Wolfram (Eds.), Measuring scholarly impact (Vol. 4, pp. 285-320). Springer International Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13
Van Raan, A. F. L. (2005). Fatal attraction: Conceputal and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods. Scinetometrics, 62, 133-143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0008-6
Vandergrift, L. (2003). Orchestrating strategy use: Toward a model of the skilled second language listener. Language Learning, 53(3), 463-496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00232
Vandergrift, L. (2004). Listening to learn or learning to listen. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 3-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190504000017
Vandergrift, L. (2007). Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research. Language Teaching, 40, 191-210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004338
Vandergrift, L., & Baker, S. (2015). Learner variables in second language listening comprehension: An exploratory path analysis. Language Learning, 65(2), 390-416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12105
Vandergrift, L., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2010). Teaching L2 learners how to listen does make a difference: An empirical study. Language Learning, 60, 470-497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00559.x
Weinberg, B. H. (1974). Bibliographic coupling: A review. Information Retrieval and Storage, 10(5), 189-196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0271(74)90058-8
Wilson, A. (2013). Embracing Bayes factors for key item analysis in corpus linguistics. In M. Bieswanger & A. Koll-Stobbe (Eds.), Language competence and language awareness in Europe: New approaches to the study of linguistic variability (pp. 3-11). Peter Lang.
Winke, P., Gass, S., & Sydorenko, T. (2010). The effects of captioning videos used for foreign language listening activities. Language Learning & Technology, 14(1), 65-86.
Yilmaz, R. M., Topu, F. B., & Takkaç Tulgar, A. (2019). An examination of the studies on foreign language teaching in preschool education: A bibliometric mapping analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(2), 1-24.
Zhang, X. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of second language acquisition between 1997 and 2018. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(1), 199-222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000573
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Lei Lei, Yaochen Deng, Dilin Liu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.