Keywords
bibliometric study
TESOL Quarterly
empirical articles
review paper
How to Cite
Number of views: 693
Number of downloads: 659
Abstract
We report the results of a bibliometric study of 696 empirical articles (EAs) published in TESOL Quarterly (TQ) over its lifespan (1967-2019). We report overall and periodic reviews (1967-1979, 1980-1989, 1990-1999, 2000-2009, 2010-2019) concerning the following themes: (1) contexts and participants, (2) research foci and theoretical orientations, and (3) research methodology and data sources. A typical article was written by a single author addressing a learning/teaching English issue related to undergraduates in US universities. The most common research foci were instruction, learning, and assessment. A quarter of the articles did not have a specifiable theoretical orientation, and for those that had, the main theoretical orientations were linguistic/scientific, linguistic/cognitive, and social. The most frequently used research methodologies were quantitative, qualitative, and eclectic, and the top three data sources used by researchers were elicitation, multiple sources, and observation. Based on the findings, we make suggestions for future research in TESOL. Overall, the present review and analysis of published EAs give readers a birds-eye view of the research gravity in TQ over the last 52 years.
References
Arapoff, N. (1967). Writing: A thinking process. TESOL Quarterly, 1(2), 33-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3585751
Atkinson, D., Churchill, E., Nishino, T., & Okada, H. (2007). Alignment and inter-action in a sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 91(2), 169-188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00539.x
Auerbach, E. R. (1993). Reexamining English only in the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 27(1), 9-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3586949
Benson, P. (2013). Qualitative methods overview. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 1-10). Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0977
Bhattacharya, U., Jiang, L., & Canagarajah, S. (2019). Race, representation, and diversity in the American association for applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 41(6), 999-1004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amz003
Block, D. (2003). The social turn in second language acquisition. Georgetown University Press.
Brown, H. D. (1972). Cognitive pruning and second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 56, 218-222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1972.tb05047.x
Brown, H. D. (1991). TESOL at twenty-five: What are the issues? TESOL Quarterly, 25(2), 245-260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3587462
Canagarajah, S. (2016). TESOL as a professional community: A half-century of pedagogy, research, and theory. TESOL Quarterly, 50(1), 7-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.275
Capco, C. S., & Tucker, G. R. (1971). Word association data and the assessment of bilingual education programs. TESOL Quarterly, 5(4), 335-342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3585500
Carr, E. (1967). Teaching the sounds of English. TESOL Quarterly, 1(1), 7-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3585907
Chen, M. (2018). A data-driven critical review of second language acquisition in the past 30 years. Publications, 6(3), 1-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/publications6030033
Cray, E., & Currie, P. (1996). Linking adult learners with the education of L2 teachers. TESOL Quarterly, 30(1), 113-130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3587609
Darian, S. (1969). Trends in EFL teaching at American universities. TESOL Quarterly, 3(3), 221-229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3585832
De Costa, P. I. (2014). Making ethical decisions in an ethnographic study. TESOL Quarterly, 48(2), 413-422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.163
Duff, P. A., & Talmy, S. (2011). Language socialization approaches to second language acquisition: Social, cultural, and linguistic development in additional languages. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 95-116). Routledge.
Gao, F., & Wright, W. E. (2020). A systematic analysis of five years of research articles published in the journal of Language, Identity, and Education (2015-2019). Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 19(1), 3-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2020.1715760
Gass, S., Loewen, S., & Plonsky, L. (2020). Coming of age: The past, present, and future of quantitative SLA research. Language Teaching, 53(1), 29-43.
Ghanbar, H., & Rezvani, R. (2023a). Research questions in applied linguistics research: A microscopic analysis of their distributional and syntactical aspects. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 156-167.
Ghanbar, H., & Rezvani, R. (2023b). Structural equation modeling in L2 research: A systematic review. International Journal of Language Testing, 13(Special Issue), 79-108.
Goodwin, C. (2007). Environmentally coupled gestures. In S. D. Duncan, J. Cassell, & E. T. Levy (Eds.), Gesture and the dynamic dimension of language (pp. 195-212). John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.1.18goo
Henning, G. (1986). Quantitative methods in language acquisition research. TESOL Quarterly, 20(4), 701-708. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3586520
Henning, G. H., Ghawaby, S. M., Saadalla, W. Z., El‐Rifai, M. A., Hannallah, R. K., & Mattar, M. S. (1981). Comprehensive assessment of language proficiency and achievement among learners of English as a foreign language. TESOL Quarterly, 15(4), 457-466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3586486
Hyland, K. (2016). Methods and methodologies in second language writing research. System, 59, 116-125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.05.002
Kamhi‐Stein, L. D. (2000). Looking to the future of TESOL teacher education: Web‐based bulletin board discussions in a methods course. TESOL Quarterly, 34(3), 423-455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3587738
Kamhi‐Stein, L. D. (2003). Reading in two languages: How attitudes toward home language and beliefs about reading affect the behaviors of “underprepared” L2 college readers. TESOL Quarterly, 37(1), 35-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3588465
Khany, R., & Tazik, K. (2019). Levels of statistical use in applied linguistics re-search articles: From 1986 to 2015. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 26(1), 48-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2017.1421498
Lam, W. S. E. (2000). L2 Literacy and the design of the self: A case study of a teenager writing on the Internet. TESOL Quarterly, 34(3), 457-482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3587739
Lamendella, J. (1969). On the irrelevance of transformational grammar to second language pedagogy. Language Learning, 19, 255-270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1969.tb00467.x
Lantolf, J. (2011). The sociocultural approach to second language acquisition: Sociocultural theory, second language acquisition, and artificial L2 development. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 24-47). Routledge.
Lee, R. R., McCune, L., & Patton, L. (1970). Physiological responses to different modes of feedback in pronunciation training. TESOL Quarterly, 4(2), 117-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3586181
Lei, L., & Liu, D. (2019a). Research trends in applied linguistics from 2005 to 2016: A bibliometric analysis and its implications. Applied Linguistics, 40(3), 540-561. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy003
Lei, L., & Liu, D. (2019b). The research trends and contributions of System’s publications over the past four decades (1973-2017): A bibliometric analysis. System, 80, 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.10.003
Liyanage, I., & Canagarajah, S. (2019). Shame in English language teaching: Desirable pedagogical possibilities for Kiribati in neoliberal times. TESOL Quarterly, 53(2), 430-455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.494
Long, R. B. (1969). Linguistic universals, deep structure, and English as a second language. TESOL Quarterly, 3(2), 123-132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3586098
Marks, M. B., & Heffernan-Cabrera, P. (1977). Teachers’ attitudes towards minority group students: Is Pygmalion turning the tables? TESOL Quarterly, 11(4), 401-406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3585736
Matsuda, P. K. (2005). Historical inquiry in second language writing. In P. K. Matsuda & T. Silva (Eds.), Second language writing research: Perspectives on the process of knowledge construction (pp. 71-96). Lawrence Erlbaum.
McKinley, J. (2019). Evolving the TESOL teaching-research nexus. TESOL Quarterly, 53(3), 875-884. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.509
Ortega, L. (2014). Ways forward for a bi/multilingual turn in SLA. In S. May (Ed.), The multilingual turn: Implications for SLA, TESOL, and bilingual education (pp. 32-52). Routledge.
Panova, I., & Lyster, R. (2002). Patterns of corrective feedback and uptake in an adult ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 36(4), 573-595. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3588241
Pavlenko, A. (2013). The affective turn in SLA: From “affective factors” to “language desire” and “commodification of affect.” In D. Gabryś-Barker & J. Bielska (Eds.), The affective dimension in second language acquisition (pp. 3-28). Multilingual Matters.
Pawan, F., & Thomalla, T. G. (2005). Making the invisible visible: A responsive evaluation study of ESL and Spanish language services for immigrants in a small rural county in Indiana. TESOL Quarterly, 39(4), 683-705. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3588527
Peirce, B. N. (1995). Social identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 9-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3587803
Pickering, L. (2001). The role of tone choice in improving ITA communication in the classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 35(2), 233-255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3587647
Riazi, A. M. (2016). Innovative mixed-methods research: Moving beyond design technicalities to epistemological and methodological realizations. Applied Linguistics, 37(1), 33-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv064
Riazi, A. M. (2017). Mixed methods research in language teaching and learning. Equinox.
Riazi, A. M., & Candlin, C. N. (2014). Mixed-methods research in language teaching and learning: Opportunities, issues, and challenges. Language Teaching, 47, 135-173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444813000505
Riazi, A. M., Ghanbar, H., & Fazel, I. (2020). The contexts, theoretical and methodological orientation of EAP research: Evidence from empirical articles published in the Journal of English for Academic Purposes. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 48, 100925. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100925
Riazi, A. M., Ghanbar, H., & Rezvani, R. (2023). Qualitative data coding and analysis: A systematic review of the papers published in the Journal of Second Language Writing. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 11(1), 25-47.
Riazi, A. M., Rezvani, R., & Ghanbar, H. (2023). Trustworthiness in L2 writing re-search: A review and analysis of qualitative articles in the Journal of Second Language Writing. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 2(3), 100065. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100065
Riazi, A. M., Shi, L., & Haggerty, J. (2018). Analysis of the empirical research in the journal of second language writing at its 25th year (1992-2016). Journal of Second Language Writing, 41, 41-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.07.002
Rivers, W. (1964). The psychologist and the foreign language teacher. University of Chicago Press.
Ross, J. (1967). The language laboratory in a small TESOL Program. TESOL Quarterly, 1(1), 15-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3585908
Rutherford, W. E. (1968). Deep and surface structure, and the language drill. TESOL Quarterly, 2(2), 71-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3586081
Schmitt, N., & Zimmerman, C. B. (2002). Derivative word forms: What do learners know? TESOL Quarterly, 36(2), 145-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3588328
Stapleton, P., & Shao, Q. (2018). Research in language teaching over two decades: A retrospective of the first 20 volumes of Language Teaching Re-search. Language Teaching Research, 22(3), 350-369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816688929
Swales, J. (1988). 20 years of the TESOL Quarterly. TESOL Quarterly, 22(1), 151-163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3587069
Tojo, H., & Takagi, A. (2017). Trends in qualitative research in three major language teaching and learning journals, 2006-2015. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 4(1), 37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/ijelt.v4n1p37
Van Lier, L. (1997). Approaches to observation in classroom research: Observation from an ecological perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 31(4), 783-787. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3587762
Wardhaugh, R. (1970). The contrastive analysis hypothesis. TESOL Quarterly, 4(2), 123-130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3586182
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.