Keywords
interdiscipline
interdisciplinary development
knowledge flow
second language acquisition
How to Cite
Number of views: 161
Number of downloads: 360
Abstract
Nowadays, research in second language acquisition (SLA) is becoming increasingly interdisciplinary while many technical frontiers and research hotspots have emerged. Many studies focus on interdisciplinary topics, but few in-depth studies have been conducted on interdisciplinarity. This study examined the interdisciplinarity of SLA and the interdisciplinary development process using a bibliometrics approach. The study has found that the SLA discipline has played roles as both the provider and recipient of knowledge in the development of interdisciplines. In the first case, SLA theories and methods flow into the research areas of life sciences and technology to form interdisciplinary studies with brain research, neurology, cognition, computer technology, and engineering, making SLA a provider of knowledge In the second case, SLA research receives knowledge from areas of arts and humanities and social sciences as well as from interdisciplinary studies within its own discipline, making SLA a receiver of knowledge. The new insights into the interdisciplinarity of SLA provided in this study are helpful for our deeper understanding of the interdisciplinary nature of the SLA discipline.
References
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Atkinson, D. (2011). Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (1st ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203830932
Atkinson, D., Byrnes, H., Doran, M., Duff, P., Ellis, N. C., Hall, J. K., . . . Douglas Fir Grp (2016). A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. Modern Language Journal, 100(1), 19-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12301
Ba, Z., Cao, Y., Mao, J., & Li, G. (2019). A hierarchical approach to analyzing knowledge integration between two fields: A case study on medical informatics and computer science. Scientometrics, 119(3), 1455-1486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03103-1
Bailón-Moreno, R., Jurado-Alameda, E., & Ruiz-Baños, R. (2006). The scientific network of surfactants: Structural analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(7), 949-960. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20362
Boyack, K. W., Klavans, R., & Börner, K. (2005). Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics, 64(3), 351-374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0255-6
Chen, M.‑L. (2016). Development of corpus-based studies in second/foreign language acquisition and pedagogy from 1990 to 2015: A bibliometric analysis. English Teaching & Learning, 40(4), 1-38.
Chen, M.‑L. (2018). A data-driven critical review of second language acquisition in the past 30 years. Publications, 6(3), 33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/publications6030033
Clarivate (2021). Web of Science core collection: Search tips. https://clarivate.libguides.com/woscc/searchtips
Cobo, M. J., Lopez-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 146-166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002
Cook, V. (1985). Chomsky’s Universal Grammar and second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 2-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/6.1.2
Csizér, K., & Dörnyei, Z. (2005). Language learners’ motivational profiles and their motivated learning behavior. Language Learning, 55(4), 613-659. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00319.x
Dakowska, M. (2013). Foreign language didactics encounters cognitive science. In K. Droździal-Szelest & M. Pawlak (Eds.), Second language learning and teaching: Psycholinguistic and sociolinguistic perspectives on second language learning and teaching (Vol. 72, pp. 3-25). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23547-4_1
Dixon, L. Q., Zhao, J., Shin, J.‑Y., Wu, S., Su, J.‑H., Burgess-Brigham, R., . . . Snow, C. (2012). What we know about second language acquisition. Review of Educational Research, 82(1), 5-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311433587
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation: The social psychology of language. Edward Arnold.
Garfield, E., Malin, M. V., & Small, H. G. (1975). A system for automatic classification of scientific literature. Journal of the Indian Institute of Science, 57(2), 61-74.
Gass, S. M. (1993). Editorial: Second language acquisition: Crossdisciplinary perspectives. Second Language Research, 9(2), 95-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026765839300900201
Gass, S. M., Behney, J., & Plonsky, L. (2013). Second language acquisition: An introductory course (4th ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203137093
Hall, J. K. (2019). The contributions of conversation analysis and interactional linguistics to a usage-based understanding of language: Expanding the transdisciplinary framework. Modern Language Journal, 103(1, SI), 80-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12535
Hicks, D. M., & Katz, J. S. (1996). Where is science going? Science, Technology, & Human Values, 21(4), 379-406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399602100401
Holbrook, J. B. (2013). What is interdisciplinary communication? Reflections on the very idea of disciplinary integration. Synthese, 190(11), 1865-1879. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0179-7
Karunan, K., Lathabai, H. H., & Prabhakaran, T. (2017). Discovering interdisciplinary interactions between two research fields using citation networks. Scientometrics, 113(1), 335-367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2481-0
Katz, J. S., & Hicks, D. (1995). The classification of interdisciplinary journals: A new approach. In M. E. D. Koenig & A. Bookstein (Eds.), Proceedings of Fifth International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (pp. 245-254). Learned Information.
Klein, W. (1998). The contribution of second language acquisition research. Language Learning, 48(4), 527-549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00057
Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford University Press.
Kramsch, C. (2003). Second language acquisition, applied linguistics and the teaching of foreign languages. The Language Learning Journal, 27(1), 66-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09571730385200101
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. H. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition research: Applied linguistics and language study. Longman.
Lee, B., & Jeong, Y.‑I. (2008). Mapping Korea’s national R&D domain of robot technology by using the co-word analysis. Scientometrics, 77(1), 3-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1819-4
Leung, C., & Valdés, G. (2019). Translanguaging and the transdisciplinary framework for language teaching and learning in a multilingual world. Modern Language Journal, 103(2), 348-370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12568
Leydesdorff, L. (2006). Can scientific journals be classified in terms of aggregated journal-journal citation relations using the Journal Citation Reports? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(5), 601-613. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20322
Leydesdorff, L., & Cozzens, S. E. (1993). The delineation of specialties in terms of journals using the dynamic journal set of the SCI. Scientometrics, 26(1), 135-156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016797
Liddicoat, A. J. (2010). Applied linguistics in its disciplinary context. Australian Re-view of Applied Linguistics, 33(2), 14.1-14.17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2104/aral1014
Liu, G.‑Y., Hu, J.‑M., & Wang, H.‑L. (2012). A co-word analysis of digital library field in China. Scientometrics, 91(1), 203-217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0586-4
McCarthy, M. (2001). Issues in applied linguistics. Cambridge University Press.
Morillo, F., Bordons, M., & Gómez, I. (2001). An approach to interdisciplinarity through bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics, 51(1), 203-222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010529114941
Morillo, F., Bordons, M., & Gómez, I. (2003). Interdisciplinarity in science: A tentative typology of disciplines and research areas. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 54(13), 1237-1249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10326
Moya-Anegón, F., Vargas-Quesada, B., Herrero-Solana, V., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Corera-Álvarez, E., & Munoz-Fernández, F. J. (2004). A new technique for building maps of large scientific domains based on the co-citation of classes and categories. Scientometrics, 61(1), 129-145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000037368.31217.34
Neupane, N. (2019). Second language acquisition as a discipline: A historical perspective. Journal of NELTA Gandaki, 2, 55-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/jong.v2i0.26603
Nichols, L. G. (2014). A topic model approach to measuring interdisciplinarity at the National Science Foundation. Scientometrics, 100(3), 741-754. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1319-2
Ortega, L. (2013). SLA for the 21st Century: Disciplinary progress, transdisciplinary relevance, and the bi/multilingual turn. Language Learning, 63, 1-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00735.x
Ortega, L. (2018). SLA in uncertain times: Disciplinary constraints, transdisciplinary hopes. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 33(1), 1-30.
Piepenbrink, A., & Nurmammadov, E. (2015). Topics in the literature of transition economies and emerging markets. Scientometrics, 102(3), 2107-2130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1513-2
Pierce, S. J. (1999). Boundary crossing in research literatures as a means of information transfer. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(3), 271-279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:3<271::AID-ASI10>3.3.CO;2-D
Plonsky, L. (2015). Advancing quantitative methods in second language research. Second Language Acquisition Research Series. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315870908
Porter, A. L., & Chubin, D. E. (1985). An indicator of cross-disciplinary research. Scientometrics, 8(3-4), 161-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016934
Porter, A. L., Cohen, A. S., David Roessner, J., & Perreault, M. (2007). Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity. Scientometrics, 72(1), 117-147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1700-5
Pyun, D. O. (2013). Attitudes toward task-based language learning: A Study of college Korean language learners. Foreign Language Annals, 46(1), 108-121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12015
Qin, J., Lancaster, F. W., & Allen, B. (1997). Types and levels of collaboration in interdisciplinary research in the sciences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(10), 893-916. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199710)48:10<893::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-X
Qiu, L. (1992). A study of interdisciplinary research collaboration. Research Evaluation, 2(3), 169-175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rev/2.3.169
Rafols, I., & Meyer, M. (2010). Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: Case studies in bionanoscience. Scientometrics, 82(2), 263-287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0041-y
Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2013). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833835
Rinia, J., van Leeuwen, T. N., Bruins, E. E. W., Van Vuren, H. G., & van Raan, A. F. J. (2001). Citation delay in interdisciplinary knowledge exchange. Scientometrics, 51(1), 293-309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010589300829
Rinia, J., van Leeuwen, T. N., Bruins, E. E. W., Van Vuren, H. G., & van Raan, A. F. J. (2002). Measuring knowledge transfer between fields of science. Scientometrics, 54(3), 347-362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016078331752
Schummer, J. (2004). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of re-search collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology. Scientometrics, 59(3), 425-465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000018542.71314.38
Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265-269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406
Small, H. (1999). Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(9), 799-813. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:9<799::AID-ASI9>3.3.CO;2-7
Stopar, K., Drobne, D., Eler, K., & Bartol, T. (2016). Citation analysis and map-ping of nanoscience and nanotechnology: Identifying the scope and interdisciplinarity of research. Scientometrics, 106(2), 563-581. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1797-x
Tarone, E. (2015). Second language acquisition in applied linguistics: 1925-2015 and beyond. Applied Linguistics, 36(4), 444-453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv035
Todeschini, R., & Baccini, A. (2016). Handbook of bibliometric indices (1st ed.). Wiley-VCH. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527681969
van Leeuwen, T., & Tijssen, R. (2000). Interdisciplinary dynamics of modern science: Analysis of cross-disciplinary citation flows. Research Evaluation, 9(3), 183-187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3152/147154400781777241
van Raan, A. R. J. (2000). The interdisciplinary nature of science: Theoretical framework and bibliometric-empirical approach. In P. Weingart & N. Stehr (Eds.), Practising interdisciplinarity (pp. 66-78). University of Toronto Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442678729-006
van Raan, A. F. J., & van Leeuwen, T. (2002). Assessment of the scientific basis of interdisciplinary, applied research: Application of bibliometric methods in Nutrition and Food Research. Research Policy, 31(4), 611-632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00129-9
VanPatten, B. (1999). What is second language acquisition and what is it doing in this department? ADFL Bulletin, 30(3), 49-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1632/adfl.30.3.49
Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2012). A new methodology for constructing a publication-level classification system of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(12), 2378-2392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22748
Web of Science (2021). Web of Science core collection help. Retrieved from https://images.webofknowledge.com/WOKRS533JR18/help/WOS/hp_database.html
Winke, P. (2013). An investigation into second language aptitude for advanced Chinese language learning. Modern Language Journal, 97(1), 109-130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.01428.x
Xu, H., Guo, T., Yue, Z., Ru, L., & Fang, S. (2016). Interdisciplinary topics of information science: A study based on the terms interdisciplinarity index series. Scientometrics, 106(2), 583-601. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1792-2
Zhang, X. (2019). A bibliometric analysis of second language acquisition between 1997 and 2018. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(1), 199-222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000573
Zhang, Y., & Sun, W. (Eds.) (2017). The visualization analysis of second language acquisition’s research evolution. Atlantis Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/iccessh-17.2017.159
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Meng-Lin Chen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.