Keywords
oral communication
emotions
video-mediated interaction
complex dynamic systems theory
How to Cite
Number of views: 28
Number of downloads: 16
Abstract
Anxiety and enjoyment, a contrastive pair of emotions that significantly affect second language (L2) learning, have been widely investigated under the framework of complex dynamic systems theory. With the growing popularity of video-mediated interactions (VMIs), the investigation of anxiety and enjoyment in online settings is important but underexplored. This study examines the relationship between anxiety and enjoyment in L2 VMIs, using an idiodynamic approach. Four L2 learners completed video-mediated conversations with native speakers (NSs) in English via an online platform and rated their anxiety and enjoyment separately while reviewing their video recordings. Subsequent interviews were carried out to explore the categories of factors influencing these emotions. The findings revealed that the relationship between anxiety and enjoyment was more than a seesaw pattern, with these two emotions converging and diverging at specific events. Moreover, we found that anxiety and enjoyment were influenced by three categories of factors: individual, interpersonal, and environmental. The triangulation of emotion ratings, stimulated recall interview data, and performance data helped build a richer understanding of emotions in L2 speaking within the VMI context and yielded practical pedagogical implications for enhancing L2 learners’ emotional experiences during L2 oral interactions.
References
Aubrey, S. (2022). The relationship between anxiety, enjoyment, and breakdown fluency during second language speaking tasks: An idiodynamic investigation. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 968946.
Azriel, O., Lazarov, A., Segal, A., & Bar-Haim, Y. (2020). Visual attention patterns during online video-mediated interaction in socially anxious individuals. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 69, 101595.
Balaman, U. (2025). A longitudinal case study of L2 interactional competence development in the ELT classroom: Teachability and learnability of L2 interactional practices. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 35(4), 2237-2247.
Boudreau, C., MacIntyre, P. D., & Dewaele, J.-M. (2018). Enjoyment and anxiety in second language communication: An idiodynamic ap-proach. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(1), 149-170.
Brantmeier, C. (2005). Nonlinguistic variables in advanced second language reading: Learners’ self-assessment and enjoyment. Foreign Language Annals, 38, 494-504.
Cheng, Y. S. (2017). Development and preliminary validation of four brief measures of L2 language-skill-specific anxiety. System, 68, 15-25.
Cheng, Z., & Sun, P. P. (2025). Does L2 speaking anxiety differ in classroom and synchronous online learning environments? Evidence from EFL college students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 41(5), e70115.
Cho, M.-H., & Cho, Y. (2016). Online instructors’ use of scaffolding strategies to promote interactions: A scale development study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(6), 108-120.
Clark, D. M., & Wells, A. (1995). A cognitive model of social phobia. In R. G. Heimberg, M. Liebowitz, D. A. Hope, & F. Schneier (Eds.), Social phobia: Diagnosis, assessment and treatment (pp. 69-93). Guildford Press.
Croes, E. A. J., Antheunis, M. L., Schouten, A. P., & Krahmer, E. J. (2016). Teasing apart the effect of visibility and physical co-presence to examine the effect of CMC on interpersonal attraction. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 468-476.
De Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007). A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(1), 7-21.
Dewaele, J.-M. (2005). Investigating the psychological and emotional dimensions in instructed language learning: obstacles and possibilities. Modern Language Journal, 89(3), 367-380.
Dewaele, J.-M., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2014). The two faces of Janus? Anxiety and enjoyment in the foreign language classroom. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4, 237-274.
Dewaele, J.-M., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2016). Foreign language enjoyment and foreign language classroom anxiety: The right and left feet of the language learner? In P. MacIntyre, T. Gregersen, & S. Mercer (Ed.), Positive Psychology in SLA (pp. 215-236). Multilingual Matters.
Ducker, N. T. (2021). Protecting and enhancing willingness to communicate with idiodynamic peer-peer strategy sharing. System, 103, 102634.
Elahi Shirvan, M., Shahnama, M., Pawlak, M., & Kruk, M. (2024). Boredom and English language conversational topics: An idiodynamic approach. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching.
Elahi Shirvan, M., & Talebzadeh, N. (2018). Exploring the fluctuations of foreign language enjoyment in conversation: An idiodynamic perspective. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 47, 21-37.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford Univer-sity Press.
Ellis, R. (2017). Task-based language teaching. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acqui-sition (pp. 108-125). Routledge.
Ellis, N. C., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (Eds.). (2009). Language as a complex adaptive system. Wiley-Blackwell.
Fatimah, S. (2019). Collaborative learning activities through MoE in engaging EFL learners and diminishing their speaking anxiety. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 2(1), 39-49.
Gao, Y., Wang, X., & Fan, P. (2024). Exploring male English majors’ motivation trajectory through complex dynamic systems theory. Current Psychology, 43(10), 9089-9100.
Guo, Y., Wang, Y., & Ortega-Martín, J. (2023). The impact of blended learning-based scaffolding techniques on learners’ self-efficacy and willingness to communicate. Porta Linguarum, 40(2), 253-273.
He, X., Zhou, D., & Zhang, X. (2021). An empirical study on Chinese university students’ English language classroom anxiety with the idiodynamic approach. SAGE Open, 11(3).
Hiver, P., Al-Hoorie, A. H., & Evans, R. (2022). Complex dynamic system theory in language learning: A scoping review of 25 years of research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 44(4), 913-941.
Hodson, K., Mcmanus, F., Clark, D., & Doll, H. (2008). Can Clark and Wells’ (1995) cognitive model of social phobia be applied to young people? Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 36(4), 449-461.
Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125-132.
Hu, L., & Wang, Y. (2023). The predicting role of EFL teachers’ immediacy behaviors in students’ willingness to communicate and academic engagement. BMC Psychol, 11, 318.
Konakahara, M. (2020). Single case analyses of two overlap sequences in casual ELF conversations from a multimodal perspective: Toward the consideration of mutual benefits of ELF and CA. Journal of Pragmatics, 170, 301-316.
Kormos, J. (2006). Speech production and second language acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Longman.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.
Li, C. (2020). The relationship between emotional intelligence and English academic achievement: The multiple mediating roles of pleasure, anxiety and burnout. Foreign Language Field, 1, 69-78.
Li, C. (2024). Task-specific emotions in L2 writing: A control-value theory approach from a positive psychology perspective. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 15(1), 73-103.
Li, C., & Dewaele, J.-M. (2021). How classroom environment and general grit predict foreign language classroom anxiety of Chinese EFL students. Journal for the Psychology of Language Learning, 3(2), 86-98.
Li, C., & Dewaele, J.-M. (2024). Understanding, measuring, and differentiating task enjoyment from foreign language enjoyment. In S. Li (Ed.), Individual differences in task-based language learning and teaching (pp. 87-114). John Benjamins.
Li, C., & Wei, L. (2025). Language attitudes: Construct, measurement, and associations with language achievements. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 46(10), 3324-3349.
Li, C., & Wei, L. (2023). Anxiety, enjoyment, and boredom in language learning amongst junior secondary students in rural China: How do they contribute to L2 achievement? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 45(1), 93-108.
Li, C., Wei, L., & Lu, X. (2023). Contributions of foreign language writing emotions to writing achievement. System, 116.
Li, C., Pawlak, M., & Kruk, M. (2025). Achievement emotions and control-value appraisals in foreign language learning. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 46(2), 364-378.
Li, M., & Baldauf, R. B. (2011). Beyond the curriculum: A Chinese example of issues constraining effective English language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 45(4), 793-803.
Licoppe, C. (2017). Showing objects in Skype video-mediated conversations: From showing gestures to showing sequences. Journal of Pragmatics, 110, 63-82.
Loewen, S., & Sato, M. (2018). Interaction and instructed second language acquisition. Language Teaching, 51(3), 285-329.
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie, & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). Academic Press.
MacIntyre, P. D. (1999). Language anxiety: A review of the research for language teachers. In D. J. Young (Ed.), Affect in foreign language and second language teaching: A practical guide to creating a low-anxiety classroom atmosphere (pp. 24-45). McGraw-Hill.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Ducker, N. (2022). The idiodynamic method: A practical guide for researchers. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 100007.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Gregersen, T. (2022). The idiodynamic method: Willingness to communicate and anxiety processes interacting in real time. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 60, 67-84.
Malabarba, T., Mendes, A. C. O., & de Souza, J. (2022). Multimodal resolution of overlapping talk in video-Mediated L2 instruction. Languages, 7(2), 154.
Manstead, A. S. R., Lea, M., & Goh, J. (2011). Facing the future: Emotion communication and the presence of others in the age of video-mediated communication. In A. Kappas & N. C. Krämer (Eds.), Face-to-face communication over the Internet: Emotions in a web of culture, language and technology (pp. 144-175). Cambridge University Press.
Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. Wiley.
Mulken, M., & Hendriks, B. (2015). Your language or mine? Or English as a lingua franca? Comparing effectiveness in English as a lingua franca and L1-L2 interactions: Implications for corporate language policies. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 36(4), 404-422.
Nakamura, S., Phung, L., & Reinders, H. (2021). The effect of learner choice on L2 task engagement. Studies of Second Language Acquisition, 43, 428-441.
Pawlak, M., & Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A. (2015). Investigating the dynamic nature of L2 willingness to communicate. System, 50, 1-9.
Pawlak, M. (2014). Error correction in the foreign language classroom: Reconsidering the issues. Springer.
Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: As-sumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315-341.
Pekrun, R., & Stephens, E. J. (2010). Achievement emotions: A control-value approach. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(4), 238-255.
Prior, M. T. (2019). Elephants in the room: An “affective turn,” or just feeling our way? Modern Language Journal, 103(2), 516-527.
Ranjbar, M., Hassanzadeh, M., & Roghanian, A. (2025). Unveiling the complexity of L2 learners’ emotions and emotion regulation: A retrodictive qualitative modeling study. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 35(1), 134-151.
Rusk, F., & Pörn, M. (2019). Delay in L2 interaction in video-mediated environments in the context of virtual tandem language learning. Linguistics and Education, 50, 56-70.
Saville-Troike, M., & Barto, K. (2016). Introducing second language acquisition (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Seuren, L. M., Wherton, J., Greenhalgh, T., & Shaw, S. E. (2021). Whose turn is it anyway? Latency and the organization of turn-taking in video-mediated interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 172, 63-78.
Shao, K., Nicholson, L. J., Kutuk, G., & Lei, F. (2020). Emotions and instructed language learning: Proposing a second language emotions and positive psychology model. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1-13.
Steinkrauss, R., & Lowie, W. (2025). Complex dynamic systems in second language acquisition. In Reference Module in Social Sciences (p. B9780323955041007 286). Elsevier.
Strambi, A., & Tudini, V. (2020). “I’ll say something about myself”: Questions and self-disclosures in Italian L1-L2 online initial interactions. Journal of Pragmatics, 170, 82-95.
Suzuki, S., & Kormos, J. (2025). L2 fluency across tasks: Disentangling demands on conceptualization and formulation in speech production. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching.
van Geert, P. (2008). The dynamic systems approach in the study of L1 and L2 acquisition: An introduction. Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 179-199.
Wang, P., Ganushchak, L., Welie, C., & van Steensel, R. (2024). The dynamic nature of emotions in language learning context: Theory, method, and analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 36, 105.
Yu, H., Peng, H., & Lowie, W. M. (2022). Dynamics of language learning mo-tivation and emotions: A parallel-process growth mixture modeling approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 899400.
Zabihi, R., & Ghahramanzadeh, B. (2022). Proficiency pairing and engagement with language in L2 peer interaction. System, 105, 102725.
Zheng, C., Trofimovich, P., Lindberg, R., McDonough, K., & Sato, M. (2025). Do they like me?: Exploring the role of metaperception in L1-L2 speaker interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 47(1), 80-103.
Zulfikar, Z. (2022). Reducing EFL learners’ speaking anxiety through selective error correction and group work. Journal of English Teaching, Applied Linguistics and Literatures, 6(1), 1-16.
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Xinyue Guo, Man Wang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.