Keywords
complex dynamic systems
critical experiences
positioning
agency
How to Cite
Number of views: 363
Number of downloads: 305
Abstract
Previous research has proposed a crucial role for critical experiences in language learning to better understand how learners understand and discursively construct their self-concept (Mercer, 2011, 2016; Serafini, 2020a; Thompson, 2020). However, studies have mainly explored critical experiences in the narratives of foreign language learners of English with little attention to how heritage speakers of languages other than English (LOTE) draw on critical experiences in discursive constructions of self. To address this gap, this study aims to explore the impact of critical experiences in university heritage Spanish speakers’ self-narratives. Twenty heritage Spanish students completed a background questionnaire and peer-facilitated, video-recorded interview. Emergent, recurring themes were identified in transcribed interview data following tenets of grounded theory (Charmaz, 2006; Glaser & Strauss, 1967). Findings underscore the key role of positioning (Davies & Harré, 1990) in dynamic conceptions of self, particularly how heritage speakers (re)imagine and discursively construct past, current, and future self-states. Positioning was also linked to agency (Ahearn, 2001) in relation to students’ critical reflections on experiences of racialization and resistance to, or reproduction of, dominant language ideologies. Overall, the study provides valuable insights for (heritage) language educators seeking to enact critical pedagogical principles in their classroom and curriculum.
References
Abdi, K. (2011). “She really only speaks English”: Positioning, language ideology, and heritage language learners. The Canadian Modern Language Re-view, 67(2), 161-189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.67.2.161
Abe, S., & Shapiro, S. (2021). Sociolinguistics as a pathway to global citizenship: Critically observing “self” and “other.” Language Awareness, 30(4), 255-370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2021.1925289
Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30(1), 109-137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.109
American Councils for International Education. (2017). The national K-12 foreign language enrollment survey report. https://www.americancouncils.org/
Aparicio, F. R. (1998). Whose Spanish, whose language, whose power?: Testifying to differential bilingualism. Indiana Journal of Hispanic Literatures, 12, 5-25.
Avineri, N. (2015). Nested interculturality, multiple knowledges, and situated identities through service-learning in language education. In J. M. Perren & A. J. Wurr (Eds.), Learning the language of global citizenship: Strengthening service-learning in TESOL (pp. 197-223). Common Ground Publishing.
Beckner, C., Blythe, R., Bybee, J., Christiansen, M. H., Croft, W., Ellis, N. C., Holland, J., Ke, J., Larsen-Freeman, D., & Schoenemann, T. (2009). Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. Language Learning, 59(s1), 1-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00533.x
Beaudrie, S. M. (2018). On the relationship between self-concept and literacy development in the Spanish heritage language context. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 34(2), 147-159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2017.1370623
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications.
Charmaz, K. (2008). Grounded theory in the 21st century: Applications for advancing social justice studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 203-241). Sage Publications.
Christophel, D. M., & Gorham, J. (1995). A test-retest analysis of student motivation, teacher immediacy, and perceived sources of motivation and demotivation in college classes. Communication Education, 44(4), 292-306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529509379020
Clark, C. T. (2002). Unfolding narratives of service learning: Reflections on teaching, literacy, and positioning in service relationships. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 46(4), 288-297.
Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1), 43-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00174.x
de Bot, K. (2015). A history of applied linguistics: From 1980 to the present. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315743769
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.19.05dor
Dörnyei, Z. (2010). The relationship between language aptitude and language learning motivation: Individual differences from a dynamic systems perspective. In E. Macaro (Ed.), Continuum companion to second language acquisition (pp. 247-267). Continuum.
Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2009). Motivation, language identities and the L2 self. Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691293
Dressler, R. (2010). “There is no space for being German”: Portraits of willing and reluctant heritage language learners of German. Heritage Language Journal, 7(2), 1-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46538/hlj.7.2.2
Driver, M. (2022). Emotion-laden texts and words: The influence of emotion on vocabulary learning for heritage and foreign language learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 44(4), 1071-1094. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000851
Falout, J. (2016). Past selves: Emerging motivational guides across temporal contexts. In J. King (Ed.), The dynamic interplay between context and the language learner (pp. 47-65). Palgrave. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137457134_4
Fishman, J. (2001). 300-plus years of heritage language education in the United States. In J. K. Peyton D. A. Ranard, & S. McGinnis (Eds.), Heritage languages in America: Preserving a national resource (pp. 81-98). Center for Applied Linguistics & Delta Systems.
Flores, N., & Rosa, J. (2015). Undoing appropriateness: Raciolinguistic ideologies and language diversity in education. Harvard Educational Review, 85(2), 149-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17763/0017-8055.85.2.149
Foulis, E. (2018). Participatory pedagogy: Oral history in the service-learning classroom. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 22(3), 119-134.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014
Goetze, J., & Driver, M. (2022). Is learning really just believing? A meta-analysis of self-efficacy and achievement in SLA. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 12(2), 233-259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2022.12.2.4
Henry, A. (2015). The dynamics of possible selves. In Z. Dörnyei, P. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 83-94). Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783092574-011
Henry, A. (2017). L2 motivation and multilingual identities. Modern Language Journal, 101(3), 548-565. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12412
Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94(3), 319-340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.94.3.319
Hornberger, N. H. (2005). Opening and filling up implementational and ideological spaces in heritage language education. Modern Language Journal, 89(4), 605-609.
Hornberger, N. H., & Wang, S. C. (2008). Who are our heritage language learners? Identity and biliteracy in heritage language education in the United States. In D. M. Brinton, O. Kagan, & S. Bauckus (Eds.), Heritage language acquisition: A new field emerging (pp. 3-38). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315092997-2
Jessner, U. (2008). Teaching third languages: Findings, trends and challenges. Language Teaching, 41, 15-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004739
Kim, Y.-K. (2023). Third space, new ethnic identities, and possible selves in the imagined communities: A case of Korean heritage language speakers. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 22(1), 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2020.1832493
King, J. (2016). Introduction to the dynamic interplay between context and the language learner. In J. King (Ed.), The dynamic interplay between context and the language learner (pp. 1-10). Palgrave. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137457134_1
Kurata, N. (2015). Motivational selves of Japanese heritage speakers in Australia. Heritage Language Journal, 12(2), 110-131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46538/hlj.12.2.1
Lado, B., & Quijano, C. (2020). Ideologies, identity, capital, and investment in a critical multilingual Spanish classroom. Critical Multilingualism Studies, 8(1), 135-164.
Lanvers, U. (2016). Lots of selves, some rebellious: Developing the self discrepancy model for language learners. System, 60, 79-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.05.012
Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/Complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18, 140-165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/18.2.141
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2002). Language acquisition and language use from a chaos/complexity theory perspective. In C. Kramsch (Ed.), Language acquisition and language socialization: Ecological Perspectives (pp. 33-46). Continuum.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2015). Ten “lessons” from complex dynamic systems theory: What is on offer. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 11-19). Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783092574-004
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2007). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.
Leeman, J. (2005). Engaging critical pedagogy: Spanish for native speakers. Foreign Language Annals, 38(1), 35-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2005.tb02451.x
Leeman, J. (2015). Heritage language education and identity in the United States. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 100-119. Leeman, J. (2018). Critical language awareness and Spanish as a heritage language: Challenging the linguistic subordination of US Latinxs. In K. Potowski (Ed.), Handbook of Spanish as a minority/heritage language (pp. 345-358). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315735139-22
Leeman, J., & Fuller, J. M. (2021). Hablar español en Estados Unidos: La socio-política del lenguaje. Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781800413955
Leeman, J., & Serafini, E. J. (2016). Sociolinguistics for heritage language educators and students: A model for critical translingual competence. In M. Fairclough & S. Beaudrie (Eds.), Innovative strategies for heritage language teaching (pp. 56-79). Georgetown University Press.
Leeman, J., & Serafini, E. J. (2021). “It’s not fair”: Discourses of deficit, equity, and effort in mixed HL/L2 Spanish classes. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 20(6), 425-439. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2020.1777866
Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954-969. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.41.9.954
Martínez, G. (2003). Classroom based dialect awareness in heritage language instruction: A critical applied linguistic approach. Heritage Language Journal, 1(1), 44-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46538/hlj.1.1.3
Mercer, S. (2011). Towards an understanding of language learner self-concept. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9569-5
Mercer, S. (2016). The contexts within me: L2 self as a complex dynamic system. In J. King (Ed.), The dynamic interplay between context and the language learner (pp. 11-28). Palgrave. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137457134_2
National Center for Education Statistics (2016 February 18). Diversity in home languages: Examining English learners in US public schools. NCES Blog. https://nces.ed.gov/blogs/nces/post/diversity-in-home-languages-examining-english-learners-in-u-s-public-schools
Neimeyer, R. A., & Levitt, H. (2001). Coping and coherence: A narrative perspective on resilience. In C. R. Snyder (Ed.), Coping with stress: Effective people and processes (pp. 47-67). Oxford University Press.
Noels, K., Pelletier, L. G., & Vallerand, R. J. (2000). Why are you learning a second language? Motivational orientations and self-determination theory. Language Learning, 50(1), 57-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00111
Pavlenko, A. (2006). Bilingual selves. In A. Pavlenko (Ed.), Bilingual minds: Emotional experience, expression and representation (pp. 1-33). Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853598746-003
Prada, J. (2018). Heritage speaker educational identity as a complex dynamic system: A grounded theory (Doctoral dissertation, Texas Tech University).
Prada, J., Guerrero-Rodriguez, P., & Pascual y Cabo, D. (2020). Heritage language anxiety in two Spanish language classroom environments: A comparative mixed methods study. Heritage Language Journal, 17(1), 92-113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46538/hlj.17.1.4
Quan, T. (2021). Critical approaches to Spanish language teacher education: Challenging raciolinguistic ideologies and fostering critical language awareness. Hispania, 104(3), 447-459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/hpn.2021.0096
Rampton, M. B. H. (1990). Displacing the “native speaker”: Expertise, affiliation, and inheritance. ELT Journal, 44(2), 97-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/44.2.97
Rosa, J. D. (2016). Standardization, racialization, languagelessness: Raciolinguistic ideologies across communicative contexts. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 26(2), 162-183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jola.12116
Ruiz, R. (1984). Orientations in language planning. NABE Journal, 8(2), 15-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08855072.1984.10668464
Serafini, E. J. (2020a). Further exploring the dynamicity, situatedness, and emergence of the self: The key role of context. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 133-157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2020.10.1.7
Serafini, E. J. (2020b). Exploring the dynamics of interlocutor IDs and language learner selves during a short-term experience abroad. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss (Ed.), Cross-theoretical explorations of interlocutors and their individual differences (pp. 209-243). John Benjamins.
Smyth, J. M., & Pennebaker, J. W. (1999). Sharing one’s story: Translating emotional experiences into words as a coping tool. In C. R. Snyder (Ed.), Coping: The psychology of what works (pp. 70-89). Oxford University Press.
Syed, Z. (2001). Notions of self in foreign language learning: A qualitative analysis. In Z. Dörnyei & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition (Technical Report #23, pp. 127-148). University of Hawai’i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
Thompson, A. S. (2017). Don’t tell me what to do! The anti-ought-to self and language learning motivation. System, 67, 38-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.04.004
Thompson, A. S. (2020). My many selves are still me: Motivation and multilingualism. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 159-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2020.10.1.8
Thompson, A. S., & Erdil-Moody, Z. (2016). Operationalizing multilingualism: Language learning motivation in Turkey. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 19, 314-331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2014.985631
Thompson, A. S., & Vásquez, C. (2015). Exploring motivational profiles through language learning narratives. Modern Language Journal, 99, 158-174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12187
Torres, J., Pascual, D., Cabo, & Beusterien, J. (2018). What’s next?: Heritage language learners shape new paths in Spanish teaching. Hispania, 100(5), 271-276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/hpn.2018.0066
United States Census Bureau (2021, October 8). 2015 data release. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/news/data-releases/2015.html
US News & World Report (2023, September 8). Best national university rankings. https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities
Ushioda, E. (1996). Learner autonomy 5: The role of motivation. Authentik.
Ushioda, E. (2009). A person-in-context relational view of emergent motivation, self and identity. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Ed.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 215-228). Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691293-012
Ushioda, E. (2014). Context and complex dynamic systems theory. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 47-54). Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783092574-008
Ushioda, E. (2017). The impact of global English on motivation to learn other languages: Towards an ideal multilingual self. Modern Language Journal, 101(3), 469-482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12413
Valdés, G. (1981). Pedagogical implications of teaching Spanish to the Spanish-speaking in the United States. In G. Valdés, A. G. Lozano, & R. García-Moya (Eds), Teaching Spanish to the Hispanic bilingual: Issues, aims, and methods (pp. 3-20). Teacher’s College Press.
Van Deusen-Scholl, N. (2003). Towards a definition of heritage language: Sociopolitical and pedagogical considerations. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 2(3), 211-230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327701JLIE0203_4
van Geert, P. L. C. (1994). Dynamic systems of development: Change between complexity and chaos. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Villa, D. J., & Rivera-Mills, S. (2009). An integrated multi-generational model for language maintenance and shift: The case of Spanish in the Southwest. Spanish in Context, 6(1), 26-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.6.1.03vil
Wiley, T. G. (2000). Continuity and change in the function of language ideologies in the United States. In T. Ricento (Ed.), Ideology, politics and language policies: Focus on English (pp. 67-85). John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.6.07wil
Xie, Y. (2014). L2 self of beginning-level heritage and nonheritage postsecondary learners of Chinese. Foreign Language Annals, 47(1), 189-203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12074
Young, R. F., & Astarita, A. C. (2013). Practice theory in language learning. Language Learning, 63(1), 171-189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00743.x
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.