Keywords
Spanish
practice-based collaborative research
rural communities
contextualized task-based evaluation
How to Cite
Number of views: 102
Number of downloads: 100
Abstract
Spanish is the second most spoken language in the United States and the most taught additional language (L2) in elementary-level schools. However, the amount and type of access differs according to the resources available. Rural settings, which comprise a third of all schools in the US, often have fewer resources and support for the development and maintenance of exposure-track L2 programs, which meet once per week with the goal of, as the name suggests, providing exposure to the L2, rather than a focus on cumulative language development. Given that there are immediate and long-term benefits of even low levels of early bilingualism, ensuring access to quality L2 education is a matter of equity. This paper centers on the first year of a longitudinal collaboration between an exposure-track Spanish language teacher in a rural elementary school, and the research team who created a task-based program tailored for the school following a needs analysis. We analyze the first year of the grant-funded program based on task effectiveness, student enjoyment, and teacher perspectives. We contextualize results within the rural community and offer initial longitudinal data on US exposure-track Spanish. We detail how we adjusted the program for the second year, are freely sharing the materials on the Task Bank (tblt.indiana.edu) and have transferred the program to the teacher’s autonomy. Finally, we highlight that the success of this program was and is due to the collaborative nature of the partnership between the teacher, the researchers, and the administrators.
References
Agirdag, O. (2014). The long-term effects of bilingualism on children of immigration: Student bilingualism and future earnings. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 17(4), 449-464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2013.816264
Azano, A. P., & Stewart, T. T. (2015). Exploring place and practicing justice: Preparing preservice teachers for success in rural schools. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 30(9), 1-12.
Bunch, G. C. (2014). The language of ideas and the language of display: Reconceptualizing “academic language” in linguistically diverse classrooms. International Multilingual Research Journal, 8(1), 70-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19313152.2014.852431
Bybee, J. (2008). Usage-based grammar and second language acquisition. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 216-236). Routledge.
Coady, M. R. (2019). “They just don’t know who we are”: Rural English learner teacher education. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching (pp. 1-6). John Wiley & Sons. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0979
Coady, M. R. (2020). Rural English learner education: A review of research and call for a national agenda. Educational Researcher, 49(7), 524-532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20931505
Corder, P. (1967). The significance of learner’s errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 5, 161-170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1967.5.1-4.161
Cuong, P. H. (2021). English language education in rural areas: Current issues, complexities and ways forward. VNU Journal of Science: Education Research, 37(4), 39-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25073/2588-1159/vnuer.4538
Curtain, H., & Dahlberg, C. A. (2016). Languages and learners making the match: World language instruction in K-8 classrooms and beyond (5th ed.). Pearson.
East, M. (2012). Task-based language teaching from the teachers’ perspective. John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.3
Ellis, N. C., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2009). Constructing a second language: Analyses and computational simulations of the emergence of linguistic constructions from usage. Language Learning, 59 (Supplement 1), 93-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00537.x
Ellis, R. (2009). Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 221-246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00231.x
Ellis, R. (2018). Reflections on task-based language teaching. Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/ELLIS0131
Erlam, R., & Tolosa, C. (2022). Pedagogical realities of implementing task-based language teaching. John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.14
Espinosa, L. M. (2015). Challenges and benefits of early bilingualism in the US context. Global Education Review, 2(1), 40-53.
Flores, N., & Rosa, J. (2015). Undoing appropriateness: Raciolinguistic ideologies and language diversity in education. Harvard Educational Review, 85(2), 149-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17763/0017-8055.85.2.149
Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2014). Input, interaction, and output in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 194-220). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203808184
Gold, B. T. (2015). Lifelong bilingualism and neural reserve against Alzheimer’s disease: A review of findings and potential mechanisms. Behavioral Brain Research, 281, 9-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2014.12.006
Gurzynski-Weiss, L. (2022, August). TBLT training in graduate courses: Training the next generation of TBLT researchers in task-based ways. In E. Kartchava (Organizer). Teacher education and TBLT. Invited colloquium at the Biennial Conference on Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning. Innsbruck, Austria.
Gurzynski-Weiss, L., Coulter-Kern, M., & Kuntz, T. (2021). Engagement and emerging elementary-level L2 Spanish: Detailing the status quo and identifying opportunities. Foreign Language Annals, 55(1), 54-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12593
Hélot, C., & Young, A. (2006). Imagining multilingual education in France: A language and cultural awareness project at primary school. In O. García, T. Skutnabb-Kangas, & M. E. Torres-Guzmán (Eds.), Imagining multilingual schools: Languages in education and globalization (pp. 69-90). Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853598968-004
Javorsky, K. H., & Moser, K. M. (2021). The impact of exploratory French instruction on child and family attitudes and aptitudes for learning world languages in preschool. Early Childhood Education Journal, 49(4), 739-750. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-020-01084-y
Johnson, J. D., & Zoellner, B. P. (2016). School funding and rural districts. In S. M. Williams & A. A. Grooms (Eds.), Educational opportunity in rural contexts: The rural politics of place (pp. 107-122). Information Age.
Kormi‐Nouri, R., Moniri, S., & Nilsson, L. G. (2003). Episodic and semantic memory in bilingual and monolingual children. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 44(1), 47-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9450.00320
Lantolf, J. P. (2020). I~ You> I~ Me: The hidden other in L2 development. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss (Ed.), Cross-theoretical explorations of interlocutors and their individual differences (pp. 79-98). John Benjamins.
Lee, O., Luykx, A., Buxton, C., & Shaver, A. (2007). The challenge of altering elementary school teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding linguistic and cultural diversity in science instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(9), 1269-1291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20198
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413- 68). Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012589042-7/50015-3
Long, M. H. (2007). Problems in second language acquisition. Routledge.
Marichal, N. V. (2021). “I feel the responsibility”: The nexus of secondary teacher knowledge, rural education, and emergent bilinguals. Theory & Practice in Rural Education, 11(2) 67-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3776/tpre.2021.v11n2p67-94
National Center for Education Statistics. (2014). Number of public school districts, by district urban-centric 12-category locale and state or jurisdiction: 2013-14. https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/ruraled/tables/a.1.a.-1.asp
Peal, E., & Lambert, W. E. (1962). The relation of bilingualism to intelligence. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 76(27), 1-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093840
Piaget, J. (1929). The child’s conception of the world. Routledge.
Pufahl, I., & Rhodes, N. C. (2011). Foreign language instruction in US schools: Results of a national survey of elementary and secondary schools. Foreign Language Annals 44(2), 258-288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2011.01130.x
Robinson, P. (2007). Task complexity, theory of mind, and intentional reasoning: Effects on L2 speech production, interaction, uptake and perceptions of task difficulty. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45(3), 193-214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2007.009
Rubio, F. (2018). Language education in elementary schools: Meeting the needs of the nation. Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), 90-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12313
Sanders, K., & Downer, J. (2012). Predicting acceptance of diversity in prekindergarten classrooms. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27(3), 503-511. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2011.12.001
Serafini, E. J., Lake, J. B., & Long, M. H. (2015). Needs analysis for specialized learner populations: Essential methodological improvements. English for Specific Purposes, 40(1), 11-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2015.05.002
Showalter, D., Hartman, S. L., Johnson, J., & Klein, B. (2019). Why rural matters, 2018-19: The time is now. A report of the Rural School and Community Trust. http://www.ruraledu.org/WhyRuralMatters.pdf
Stephens, M. A. (1997). Bilingualism, creativity, and social problem-solving (Doctoral dissertation, Fordham University). ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Thompson, A. (2022). Language learning in rural America: Creating an ideal self with limited resources. In A. H. Al-Hoorie & S. Fruzsina (Eds.), Researching language learning motivation: A concise guide (pp. 99-110). Bloomsbury. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350166912.ch-10
United States Census Bureau. (2021). Types of language spoken at home in United States (2021 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates). United States Census Bureau. https://data.census.gov/profile?q=United+States&g=0100000US
United States Department of Education (2021). Federal role in education. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/about/overview/fed/role.html
Van den Branden, K. (2009). Training teachers: Task-based as well? In K. Van den Branden, M. Bygate, & J. M. Norris (Eds.), Task-based language teaching: A reader (pp. 401-429). John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.1
Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Longman.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.