Keywords
metacognitive knowledge
vocabulary knowledge
breadth of vocabulary knowledge
How to Cite
Number of views: 158
Number of downloads: 191
Abstract
Metacognitive knowledge significantly influences English vocabulary knowledge. However, few longitudinal studies have explored the reciprocal growth trajectories of metacognitive knowledge and English vocabulary knowledge over time. The present study explores how young primary school learners develop their metacognitive knowledge and vocabulary knowledge from Grade 3 to Grade 6.The longitudinal sample included 361 Grade 3 (third-year primary school) students (M = 9.60 years, SD = 0.85). The participants completed tests of metacognitive knowledge and vocabulary knowledge on four occasions. The metacognitive knowledge test focused on students’ cognitive activities, whereas the vocabulary knowledge test focused on learners’ breadth of vocabulary knowledge. Cross-lagged panel analysis was employed to explore the reciprocal effects of metacognitive knowledge and the breadth of vocabulary knowledge. The results supported the role of metacognitive knowledge in developing the breadth of vocabulary knowledge, and vice versa. Implications for young learners’ longitudinal development of metacognitive knowledge and vocabulary knowledge are discussed.
References
Anderson, R. C., & Freebody, P. (1981). Vocabulary knowledge. In J. T. Guth-rie (Ed.), Comprehension and teaching: Research reviews (pp. 77-117). International Reading Association.
Annevirta, T., Laakkonen, E., Kinnunen, R., & Vauras, M. (2007). Developmental dynamics of metacognitive knowledge and text comprehension skill in the first primary school years. Metacognition and Learning, 2, 21-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-007-9005-x
Annevirta, T., & Vauras, M. (2001). Metacognitive knowledge in primary grades: A longitudinal study. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 16(2), 257-282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173029
Anthony, L., & Nation, I. S. P. (2017). Picture vocabulary size test (Version 1.2.0) [Computer Software]. Waseda University. http://www.laurenceanthony.net/software/pvst
Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. Weinert & R. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation and understanding (pp. 65-116). Erlbaum.
Butler, Y. G. (2020). The ability of young learners to construct word meaning in context. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 10(3), 547-578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2020.10.3.7
Candry, S., Deconinck, J., & Eyckmans, J. (2017). Metalinguistic awareness in L2 vocabulary acquisition: Which factors influence learners’ motivations of form-meaning connections? Language Awareness, 26(3), 226-243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2017.1400040
Carcamo, B. (2023). The roles of vocabulary knowledge and metacognitive awareness as mediators between prior knowledge and L2 academic reading. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 33(2), 292-326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12466
Cheung, S. (2023). Exploring the impact of lexical threshold on listening comprehension. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 5(4), 37-54.
Cotterall, S., & Murray, G. (2009). Enhancing metacognitive knowledge: Structure, affordances and self. System, 37, 34-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.08.003
Endres, T., Carpenter, S., & Renkl, A. (2024). Constructive retrieval: Benefits for learning, motivation, and metacognitive monitoring. Learning and Instruction, 94, 101974. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101974
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.34.10.906
Guo, L. (2018). Modeling the relationship of metacognitive knowledge, L1 reading ability, L2 language proficiency and L2 reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 30(2), 209-231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/66922
Hennecke, M., & Kulkarni, P. (2024). Metacognitive knowledge about self-control. Current Opinion in Psychology, 59, 101861. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101861
Hu, L.-Z. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Jung, T., & Wickrama, K. A. (2008). An introduction to latent class growth analysis and growth mixture modeling. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 302-317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00054.x
Karpicke, J. D., Lehman, M., & Aue, W. R. (2014). Retrieval-based learning: An episodic context account. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 61, 237-284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800283-4.00007-1
Kavé, G. (2024). Vocabulary changes in adulthood: Main findings and methodological considerations. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 59, 58-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12820
Kavé, G., Gorokhod, R., Yerushalmi, A., & Salner, N. (2019). Frequency effects on spelling in Hebrew-speaking younger and older adults. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40(5), 1173-1188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716419000171
Lee, J. H., Ahn, J. J., & Lee, H. (2022). The role of motivation and vocabulary learning strategies in L2 vocabulary knowledge: A structural equation modeling analysis. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 12(3), 435-458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2022.12.3.5
Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis, and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525-542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294825
Nassaji, H. (2004). The relationship between depth of vocabulary knowledge and L2 learners’ lexical inferencing strategy use and success. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 61(1), 107-134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/cml.2004.0006
Nation, I. S. P. (2022). Learning vocabulary in another language (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009093873
Perc, M. (2014). The Matthew effect in empirical data. Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 11(98), 20140378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2014.0378
Qian, D. D. (2002). Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: An assessment perspective. Language Learning, 52, 513-536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00193
Qian, J., Li, C., & Li, D. (2025). Exploring Chinese multilingual students’ metacognitive knowledge, strategies, and experiences in academic writing. Language Awareness, 34(1), 77-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2024.2375629
Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511732942
Roebers, C. M., & Spiess, M. (2017). The development of metacognitive monitoring and control in second graders: A short-term longitudinal study. Journal of Cognition and Development, 18, 110-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2016.1157079
Sato, M. (2022). Metacognition. In S. Li, P. Hiver, & M. Papi (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and individual differences (pp. 95-109). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003270546-8
Sato, M., & Dussuel Lam, C. (2021). Metacognitive instruction with young learners: A case of willingness to communicate, L2 use, and metacognition of oral communication. Language Teaching Research, 25(6), 899-921. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211004639
Schmitt, N. (2008). Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12, 329-363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168808089921
Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230293977
Schmitt, N. (2014). Size and depth of vocabulary knowledge: What the research shows. Language Learning, 64(4), 913-951. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12077
Schneider, J. M., Abel, A. D., & Maguire, M. J. (2023). Vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension account for SES-differences in how school-aged children infer word meanings from sentences. Language Learning and Development, 19(4), 369-385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2022.2081573
Schneider, W. (2008). The development of metacognitive knowledge in children and adolescents: Major trends and implications for education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 2(3), 114-121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2008.00041.x
Schneider, W., Lingel, K., Artelt, C., & Neuenhaus, N. (2017). Metacognitive knowledge in secondary school students: Assessment, structure, and developmental change. In D. Leutner, J. Fleischer, J. Grünkorn, & E. Klieme (Eds.), Competence assessment in education (pp. 285-302). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50030-0_17
Schneider, W., Tibken, C., & Richter, T. (2022). The development of metacognitive knowledge from childhood to young adulthood: Major trends and educational implications. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 63, 273-307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.acdb.2022.04.006
Schraw, G. (1994). The effect of metacognitive knowledge on local and global monitoring. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2, 143-154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1013
Schunk, D. H. (2013). Social cognitive theory and self-regulated learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (pp. 119-144). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203831076
Selig, J. P., & Little, T. D. (2012). Autoregressive and cross-lagged panel analysis for longitudinal data. In B. Laursen, T. D. Little, & N. A. Card (Eds.), Handbook of developmental research methods (pp. 265-278). Guilford Press.
Shin, H. W., Sok, S., & Do, J. (2023). Role of individual differences in incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition through listening to stories: Metacognitive awareness and motivation. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 61(4), 1669-1695. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2021-0212
Song, S., Su, M., Kang, C., Liu, H., Zhang, Y., McBride-Chang, C., Tardif, T., Li, H., Liang, W., Zhang, Z., & Shu, H. (2014). Tracing children’s vocabulary development from preschool through the school-age years: An 8-year longitudinal study. Developmental Science, 18, 119-131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12190
Teng, M. F. (2022). Exploring awareness of metacognitive knowledge and acquisition of vocabulary knowledge in primary grades: A latent growth curve modelling approach. Language Awareness, 31(4), 470-494. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2021.1972116
Teng, M. F. (2025). Longitudinal analysis of breadth of vocabulary knowledge in mediating metacognitive knowledge and reading in foreign language young learners. Reading in a Foreign Language, 37(1), 18-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/67496
Teng, M. F., & Mizumoto, A. (2024). Validation of metacognitive knowledge in vocabulary learning and its predictive effects on incidental vocabulary learning from reading. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2023-0294
Teng, F., & Zhang, L. J. (2021). Development of children’s metacognitive knowledge, reading and writing proficiency in English as a foreign language: Longitudinal data using multilevel models. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 1202-1230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12413
Teng, M. F., & Zhang, L. J. (2022). Development of metacognitive knowledge and morphological awareness: A longitudinal study of ethnic minority multilingual young learners in China. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2022.2052301
Teng, M. F., & Zhang, L. J. (2024a). Ethnic minority multilingual young learners’ longitudinal development of metacognitive knowledge and breadth of vocabulary knowledge. Metacognition and Learning, 19(1), 123-146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-023-09360-z
Teng, M. F., & Zhang, L. J. (2024b). Validating a new method for assessing young foreign language learners’ metacognitive knowledge. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 100121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2024.100121
Uttl, B. (2002). North American adult reading test: Age norms, reliability, and validity. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24(8), 1123-1137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1076/jcen.24.8.1123.8375
Webb, S., & Nation, P. (2017). How vocabulary is learned. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25170/ijelt.v12i1.1458
Wenden, A. L. (1998). Metacognitive knowledge and language learning. Applied Linguistics, 19(4), 515-537. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/19.4.515
White, B., & Frederiksen, J. (2005). A theoretical framework and approach for fostering metacognitive development. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 211-223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4004_3
Zargar, E., Adams, A. M., & Connor, C. M. (2020). The relations between children’s comprehension monitoring and their reading comprehension and vocabulary knowledge: An eye-movement study. Reading and Writing, 33(3), 511-545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09966-3
Zhang, L. J. (2010). A dynamic metacognitive systems account of Chinese university students’ knowledge about EFL reading. TESOL Quarterly, 44(2), 320-353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2010.223352
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mark Feng Teng
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.