Keywords
task control
L2 writing
positive psychology
Task-based language teaching (TBLT)
How to Cite
Number of views: 492
Number of downloads: 231
Abstract
Flow has been highly valued by educational researchers and practitioners for its positive effects on learner well-being, learning outcomes, and academic success. While interest in flow within second language (L2) acquisition has grown recently, comprehensive evidence remains limited regarding both its antecedents and its impact on L2 task performance, particularly in writing contexts. Grounded in Egbert’s (2003) theoretical model of flow and language acquisition, this study investigated how flow states in L2 writing are shaped by learners’ prior writing proficiency and immediate perceptions of task control, and how these factors collectively influence writing task performance. A total of 206 Chinese eighth-graders learning English as a foreign languagecompleted a pre-task L2 writing proficiency test, an argumentative writing task, and post-task scales measuring task flow and task control. Path analysis revealed that perceived task control predicted task performance both directly and indirectly through its influence on task flow. In contrast, L2 writing proficiency predicted task performance directly, without mediation by task flow. These findings largely support Egbert’s (2003) model within a task-based L2 writing context. The study suggests pedagogical implications for task design, emphasizing the importance of fostering a sense of control to facilitate flow states and enhance task performance.
References
Abuhamdeh, S. (2020). Investigating the “flow” experience: Key conceptual and operational issues. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 158.
Almukhaild, H., & King, J. (2024). Scaling the apex of engagement: Anxious language learners’ positive flow experiences during speaking tasks. System, 124, 103373.
Amini, D., Ayari, S., & Amini, M. (2016). The effect of flow state on EFL learners’ vocabulary learning. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 3(5), 9-18.
Aubrey, S. (2017a). Inter-cultural contact and flow in a task-based Japanese EFL classroom. Language Teaching Research, 21(6), 717-734.
Aubrey, S. (2017b). Measuring flow in the EFL classroom: Learners’ percep-tions of inter‐and intra‐cultural task‐based interactions. TESOL Quarterly, 51(3), 661-692.
Baralt, M., & Gurzynski-Weiss, L. (2011). Comparing learners’ state anxiety during task-based interaction in computer-mediated and face-to-face communication. Language Teaching Research, 15(2). 201-229.
Cambridge Assessment English. (2020). A2 key for schools: Handbook for teachers. Cambridge University Press & Assessment.
Cho, M. (2018). Task complexity and modality: Exploring learners’ experience from the perspective of flow. Modern Language Journal, 102(1), 162-180.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. Jossey-Bass.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1991). Flow. Munksgaard København.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (Ed.). (2014). Flow and the foundations of positive psychology: The collected works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. Springer.
Czimmermann, E., & Piniel, K. (2016). Advanced language learners’ experiences of flow in the Hungarian EFL classroom. In P. D. MacIntyre, T. Gregersen, & S. Mercer (Eds.), Positive psychology in SLA (pp. 193-214). Multilingual Matters.
Dewaele, J.-M., & Li, C. (2020). Emotions in second language acquisition: A critical review and research agenda. Foreign Language World, 196(1), 34-49.
Dewaele, J.-M., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2014). The two faces of Janus? Anxiety and enjoyment in the foreign language classroom. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4(2), 237-274.
Dewaele, J.-M., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2024). “You can’t start a fire without a spark.” Enjoyment, anxiety, and the emergence of flow in foreign lan-guage classrooms. Applied Linguistics Review, 15(2), 403-426.
Dewaele, J.-M., MacIntyre, P. D., Kamal Ahmed, I., & Albakistani, A. (2023). Emotional, attitudinal, and sociobiographical sources of flow in online and in-person EFL classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 46, 91-109.
Dörnyei, Z., & Dewaele, J.-M. (2022). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. Taylor & Fran-cis.
Egbert, J. (2003). A study of flow theory in the foreign language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 87(4), 499-518.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (2020). Task-based language teaching: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., & Goetz, T. (2007). Girls and mathematics – A “hopeless” issue? A control-value approach to gender differences in emotions towards mathematics. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22(4), 497-514.
Ghanbaran, S., Ketabi, S., & Shahnazari, M. (2023). Investigating the effect of task type and modality on flow experience among intermediate Persian EFL learners. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 52(6), 2835-2862.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
Harris, D. J., Allen, K. L., Vine, S. J., & Wilson, M. R. (2023). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between flow states and performance. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 16(1), 693-721.
Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Tai, K. H., & Lin, P. H. (2017). Intrinsic motivation of Chinese learning in predicting online learning self-efficacy and flow experience relevant to students’ learning progress. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(6), 552-574.
Kormos, J. (2012). The role of individual differences in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), 390-403.
Kormos, J. (2023). The role of cognitive factors in second language writing and writing to learn a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 45(3), 622-646.
Li, C. (2021). A control-value theory approach to boredom in English classes among university students in China. Modern Language Journal, 105(1), 317-334.
Li, C. (2024). Task-specific emotions in L2 writing: A control-value theory approach from a positive psychology perspective. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 15(1), 73-103.
Li, C. (2026). Reshaping second language acquisition research from a positive language education perspective: Constructing a “resonant zone” of individual-environmental strengths. Contemporary Foreign Language Studies [《当代外语研究》], (1), 1-23.
Li, C., & Dewaele, J.-M. (2024). Understanding, measuring, and differentiat-ing task enjoyment from foreign language enjoyment. In S. Li (Ed.), Individual differences in task-based language learning and teaching (pp. 87-114). John Benjamins.
Li, C., Wei, L., & Lu, X. (2023). Contributions of foreign language writing emotions to writing achievement. System, 116, 103074.
Li, C., Wei, L., & Lu, X. (2024). Task complexity and L2 writing performance of young learners: Contributions of cognitive and affective factors. Modern Language Journal, 108(3), 741-770.
Li, R., Meng, Z., Tian, M., Zhang, Z., & Xiao, W. (2019). Modelling Chinese EFL learners’ flow experiences in digital game-based vocabulary learning: The roles of learner and contextual factors. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(4), 483-505.
Liu, P., Zhang, Y., & Liu, D. (2022). Flow experience in foreign language writing: Its effect on students’ writing process and writing performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 952044.
MacIntyre, P. D. (2023). The idiodynamic method. In C. Lambert, S. Aubrey, & G. Bui (Eds.), The role of the learner in task-based language teaching (pp. 125-140). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003227267-11/idiodynamic-method-peter-macintyre
MacIntyre, P. D., & Mercer, S. (2014). Introducing positive psychology to SLA. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4(2), 153-172.
Mercer, S., & Dörnyei, Z. (2020). Engaging language learners in contemporary classrooms. Cambridge University Press.
Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13-103). Macmillan.
Moeller, A. J. (2018). Bringing flow into the language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 51(4), 711-713.
Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2009). Flow theory and research. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology (2nd ed., pp. 195-206). Oxford University Press.
Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). The concept of flow. In M. Csikszentmihalyi (Ed.), Flow and the foundations of positive psychology: The collected works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi (pp. 239-263). Springer.
Pawlak, M., Kruk, M., Zawodniak, J., & Pasikowski, S. (2020). Investigating factors responsible for boredom in English classes: The case of advanced learners. System, 91, 102259.
Peifer, C., & Engeser, S. (2021). Theoretical integration and future lines of flow research. In C. Peifer & S. Engeser (Eds.), Advances in flow research (2nd ed., pp. 417-439). Springer.
Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315-341.
Pekrun, R., Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., & Perry, R. P. (2007). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: An integrative approach to emotions in education. In P. A. Schutz & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotion in education (pp. 13-36). Elsevier Academic Press.
Peterson, C. (2006). A primer in positive psychology. Oxford University Press.
Piniel, K., & Albert, Á. (2019). Motivation and flow. In M. Lamb, K. Csizér, A. Henry, & S. Ryan (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of motivation for language learning (pp. 579-597). Springer International Publishing.
Piniel, K., & Ritecz, F. (2022). Flow experiences during speaking tasks in the Hungarian English as a foreign language high school classroom. In G. Tankó & A. M. Wind (Eds.), DEAL 2022: Challenges and opportunities in contemporary English applied linguistics (pp. 197-226). Eötvös Loránd University, Faculty of Humanities.
Ravid, D., & Tolchinsky, L. (2002). Developing linguistic literacy: A compre-hensive model. Journal of Child Language, 29(2), 417-447.
Révész, A., Kourtali, N., & Mazgutova, D. (2017). Effects of task complexity on L2 writing behaviors and linguistic complexity. Language Learning, 67(1), 208-241.
Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 27-57.
Rogatko, T. P. (2009). The influence of flow on positive affect in college students. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10, 133-148.
Rubio, F. D. (2011). Optimal experiences in the foreign language classroom: Flow states in speaking tasks. Anglistik. International Journal of English Studies, 22(1), 63-80.
Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Schneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. (2014). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. In M. Csikszentmihalyi (Ed.), Applications of flow in human development and education (pp. 475-494). Springer.
West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and application. Newbery Park.
Wu, Q., & Albert, Á. (2024). Learner agency and potential for creativity in writing task design and Chinese EFL students’ flow experiences in writing: A contextual perspective. Language Teaching Research.
Zuniga, M. (2023). The correlates of flow in the L2 classroom: Linking basic L2 task features to learner flow experiences. Modern Language Journal, 107(3), 650-668.
Zuniga, M., & Payant, C. (2021). In flow with task repetition during collaborative oral and writing tasks. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 24(2), 48-69.
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Chengchen Li, Jean-Marc Dewaele, Peter MacIntyre
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.