Keywords
perceived L2 proficiency
willingness to communicate
multifaceted interactions
psychological network analysis
How to Cite
Number of views: 7
Number of downloads: 3
Abstract
Interaction provides second language (L2) learners with opportunities for authentic language use and promotes their language development, underscoring the need to identify factors that contribute to L2 interactions. Drawing on the pyramid model of willingness to communicate (WTC), this study explores how classroom social climate (CSC), perceived L2 proficiency (PLP), and WTC influence students’ multifaceted interactions (MI) with their teachers, peers, and computer tools. A total of 665 Chinese non-English majors voluntarily participated in the study. A two-phase analytical approach combining partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) and psychological network analysis (PNA) was employed to examine both linear and non-linear relationships among the variables. The PLS-SEM results showed that CSC and WTC significantly and positively predicted MI, whereas the direct effect of PLP on MI was negligible. WTC significantly mediated the paths from CSC and PLP to MI, with mediating effects exceeding the corresponding direct effects. The PNA further underscores the central position of WTC in the network and its bridging role in linking CSC and PLP to MI. These findings highlight key factors shaping L2 interactions and offer practical implications for language education.
References
Cao, Y., & Philp, J. (2006). Interactional context and willingness to communicate: A comparison of behavior in whole class, group and dyadic interaction. System, 34(4), 480-493. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.05.002
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Collier, J. (2020). Applied structural equation modeling using AMOS: Basic to advanced techniques. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003018414
Derakhshan, A., Fathi, J., Pawlak, M., & Kruk, M. (2022). Classroom social climate, growth language mindset, and student engagement: the mediating role of boredom in learning English as a foreign language. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2022.2099407
Dörnyei, Z., & Murphey, T. (2003). Group dynamics in the language class-room. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667138
Du, H. (2015). American college students studying abroad in China: Language, identity, and self-presentation. Foreign Language Annals, 48(2), 250-266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12138
Epskamp, S., Borsboom, D., & Fried, E. I. (2018). Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper. Behavior Research Methods, 50(1), 195-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0862-1
Fan, Y. M., & Xu, J. F. (2020). Exploring student engagement with peer feedback on L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 50, 100775. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100775
Freeborn, L., Andringa, S., Lunansky, G., & Rispens, J. (2023). Network analysis for modeling complex systems in SLA research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 45(2), 526-557. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263122000407
Hair, J., & Alamer, A. (2022). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 100027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100027
Hampel, R., & Stickler, U. (2012). The use of videoconferencing to support multimodal interaction in an online language classroom. ReCALL, 24(2), 116-137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S095834401200002X
Henry, A., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2024). Willingness to communicate, multilingualism and interactions in community contexts. Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/HENRY1944
Ji, H., Han, I., & Park, S. (2024). Teaching foreign language with conversational AI: Teacher-student-AI interaction. Language Learning & Technology, 28(2), 91-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/73573
Joe, H.-K., Hiver, P., & Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2017). Classroom social climate, self-determined motivation, willingness to communicate, and achievement: A study of structural relationships in instructed second language settings. Learning and Individual Differences, 53, 133-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.11.005
Jung, I., Choi, S., Lim, C., & Leem, J. (2002). Effects of different types of interaction on learning achievement, satisfaction and participation in web-based instruction. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39(2), 153-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290252934603
Kim, H.-I. (2024). Exploring the interplay of language mindsets, self-efficacy, engagement, and perceived proficiency in L2 learning. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03783-y
Kim, Y. (2017). Cognitive interactionist perspectives on task-based language teaching. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 126-145). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315676968-8
Loewen, S., & Sato, M. (2018). Interaction and instructed second language acquisition. Language Teaching, 51(3), 285-329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000125
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). Academic Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012589042-7/50015-3
Long, M. H., & Porter, P. A. (1985). Group work, interlanguage talk, and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 19(2), 207-228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3586827
MacIntyre, P. D., Dörnyei, Z., Clément, R., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545-562. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb05543.x
Mackey, A., & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies (pp. 407-453). Oxford University Press.
McCroskey, J. C., & Baer, J. (1985). Willingness to communicate: The construct and its measurement. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 13, 265-278.
Patrick, H., & Ryan, A. M. (2005). Identifying adaptive classrooms: Dimensions of the classroom social environment. In K. A. Moore & L. H. Lippman (Eds.), What do children need to flourish? The search institute series on developmentally attentive community and society (pp. 271-287). Springer Science + Business Media. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23823-9_17
Peng, A., & Patterson, M. M. (2022). Relations among cultural identity, motivation for language learning, and perceived English language proficiency for international students in the United States. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 35(1), 67-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2021.1938106
Peng, J.-E., & Woodrow, L. (2010). Willingness to communicate in English: A model in the Chinese EFL classroom context. Language Learning, 60(4), 834-876. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00576.x
Pikhart, M. (2021). Human-computer interaction in foreign language learning applications: Applied linguistics viewpoint of mobile learning. Procedia Computer Science, 184, 92-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.03.123
Qiu, F. (2022). Reviewing the role of positive classroom climate in improving English as a foreign language students’ social interactions in the online classroom. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1012524. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1012524
Raghul, E., & Saradha, R. (2016). Creating a positive classroom climate: A motivational factor for English language acquisition. Man In India, 96, 1459-1465.
Rotjanawongchai, S. (2023). Perceptions of situational factors of willingness to communicate inside and outside the classroom: Thai EFL first-year university students’ reflections. Journal of Language and Education, 9(3), 129-143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2023.13245
Saeed, M. A., & Alharbi, M. A. (2023). Towards fostering Saudi EFL learners’ collaborative engagement and feedback literacy in writing. Assessing Writing, 56, 100721. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100721
Sato, M. (2022). Mixed methods research in ISLA. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss & Y. Kim (Eds.), Instructed second language acquisition research methods (pp. 79-102). John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.3.04sat
Soyoof, A. (2023). Iranian EFL students’ perception of willingness to communicate in an extramural digital context. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(9), 5922-5939. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2024579
Su, Y.-C. (2021). College students’ oral communication strategy use, self-perceived English proficiency and confidence, and communication anxiety in Taiwan’s EFL learning. Educational Studies, 57(6), 650-669. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2021.1919677
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Newbury House.
Tanaka, M. (2024). Motivation and growth in kanji proficiency: A longitudinal study using latent growth curve modeling. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 62(4), 1459-1483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2022-0210
Vincze, L., & MacIntyre, P. (2017). Accent stigmatization as a moderator of the relationship between perceived L2 proficiency and L2 use anxiety. Applied Linguistics Review, 8(1), 61-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2015-2004
Wang, C., Tseng, W.-T., Chen, Y.-L., & Cheng, H.-F. (2019). Classroom interactions in the target language: Learners’ perceptions, willingness to communicate, and communication behavior. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29(5), 393-404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00492-y
Wang, F. F., Cheung, A. C. K., & Chai, C. S. (2024). Language learning development in human-AI interaction: A thematic review of the research landscape. System, 125, 24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103424
Wang, H., Patterson, M. M., & Peng, A. Q. (2024). Predictors of second language willingness to communicate among US undergraduate students: Classroom social climate, emotions, and language mindset. Language Teaching Research. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688241237214
Wang, X., & Hui, L. (2024). Buoyancy and engagement in online English learning: The mediating roles and complex interactions of anxiety, enjoyment, and boredom. System, 125, 103418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103418
Wang, Y., & Ryan, J. (2020). The complexity of control shift for learner autonomy: A mixed-method case study of Chinese EFL teachers’ practice and cognition. Language Teaching Research, 27, 518-543. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820957922
Wei, C.-W., Chen, N.-S., & Kinshuk. (2012). A model for social presence in online classrooms. Educational Technology Research Development, 60, 529-545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-012-9234-9
Xu, J. F., & Feng, X. L. (2024). A study on the multiple interaction and its influencing factors in college English learning: Insights from psychological network analysis. Foreign Language Learning Theory and Practice, 4, 40-61.
Xu, J. F., Yang, J. Q., & Qiu, Y. J. (2025). An exploration into the functioning mechanism for EFL learners multiple interaction: The shaping role of affordance perceptions. Foreign Language World, 1, 55-63.
Yang, L., & Lin, Y. (2024). To talk or to remain silent? Foreign language enjoyment and perceived classroom climate as drivers of change in Chinese EFL learners’ willingness to communicate: A latent growth curve analysis. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 8, 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2024.2391376
Yashima, T., MacIntyre, P. D., & Ikeda, M. (2018). Situated willingness to communicate in an L2: Interplay of individual characteristics and context. Language Teaching Research, 22(1), 115-137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816657851
Zhang, X., Xun, H., & Wang, X. (2026). Mapping the triadic interaction network in AI-enhanced L2 classrooms: A social network analysis of learning outcomes and the moderating role of AI literacy. System, 140, 104050. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2026.104050
Zhou, M., Liu, X., & Guo, J. (2025). The mediating effect of self-efficacy between teacher emotional support and interaction engagement in EFL learning. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 46(7), 1988-2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2023.2267033
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jinfen Xu, Xiaoli Feng
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.