Keywords
AI-enhanced classrooms
autonomy
L2 teachers
phenomenological approach
How to Cite
Number of views: 0
Number of downloads: 0
Abstract
The increasing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into second and foreign language (L2) classrooms has reshaped instructional practices and decision-making processes, yet its implications for teacher autonomy remain underexplored. To address this gap, this phenomenological inquiry examined how English language teachers perceive the influence of AI on their autonomy. The study collected data through in-depth semi-structured interviews and narrative frames from a purposive sample of 43 English teachers.Hybrid thematic analysis was conducted using MAXQDA software to analyze participants’ lived experiences of autonomy in AI-enhanced classrooms as reflected in their narratives, interpretations, and reflections. Findings indicated that AI enhanced English teachers’ autonomy over professional teaching by providing access to a wider range of teaching resources and enabling more flexible, personalized approaches. In managing student learning, many teachers reported increased autonomy as AI tools allowed for more tailored and responsive instructional strategies. Regarding professional learning, AI-supported opportunities for self-directed learning and reflection further reinforced teachers’ autonomy. Nonetheless, some teachers experienced reduced autonomy when institutional requirements or the prescriptive design of AI tools limited their pedagogical freedom. Our study contributes to a deeper understanding of how AI technologies can both empower and constrain teacher autonomy and highlights the importance of mindful integration strategies that prioritize teachers’ autonomy.
References
Allwright, D. (1988). Autonomy and individualization in whole-class instruction. In A. Brookes & P. Grundy (Eds.), Individualization and autonomy in language learning (pp. 35-44). Modern English Publications and the British Council.
Appova, A., & Arbaugh, F. (2018). Teachers’ motivation to learn: Implications for supporting professional growth. Professional Development in Education, 44(1), 5-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2017.1280524
Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007
Barkhuizen, G. (2015). Narrative knowledging in second language teaching and learning contexts. In A. De Fina & A. Georgakopoulou (Eds.), The handbook of narrative analysis (pp. 97-115). Wiley Publishing Company. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118458204.ch5
Barrios-Beltran, D. (2024). Enriching the teaching-learning experience by using AI tools in the L2 classroom. In P. Fang (Ed.), AI in language teaching, learning, and assessment (pp. 61-77). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-0872-1.ch004
Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. Longman.
Benson, P. (2008). Teachers’ and learners’ perspectives on autonomy. In T. Lamb & H. Reinders (Eds.), Learner and teacher autonomy: Concepts, realities, and response (pp. 15-32). John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.1.05ben
Benson, P. (2010). Teacher education and teacher autonomy: Creating spaces for experimentation in secondary school English language teaching. Language Teaching Research, 14(3), 259-275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810365236
Benson, P. (2016). Teacher autonomy and teacher agency. In G. Barkhuizen (Ed.), Reflections on language teacher identity research (pp. 26-31). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315643465-7
Borg, S. (2018). Evaluating the impact of professional development. RELC Journal, 49(2), 195-216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688218784371
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Case, R., Liu, L., & Mintz, J. (2025). Integrating AI technology into language teacher education: Challenges, potentials, and assumptions. Computers in the Schools. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003662921
Cirocki, A., & Anam, S. U. (2024). “How much freedom do we have?” The perceived autonomy of secondary school EFL teachers in Indonesia. Language Teaching Research, 28(2), 440-465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211007472
Derakhshan, A. (2025). Tracking the effects of Gemini as a GenAI tool on L2 learners’ writing proficiency and anxiety: Latent growth curve modeling approach. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-025-01042-5
Derakhshan, A. (2026). L2 teachers’ foreign language teaching anxiety (FLTA) in AI-enhanced writing classrooms: A phenomenological nested ecosystem model. Journal of Second Language Writing, 72, 101304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2026.101304
Derakhshan, A., & Alrabai, F. (2026). Unpacking L2 teachers’ and learners’ reflections on the hidden challenges of AI-assisted language education. Porta Linguarum. An International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Learning, 46, 265-285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi46.37082
Derakhshan, A., Corral-Robles, S., Ortega-Martín, J. L., & Ortega-Rodríguez, P. (2026). Unpacking Spanish EFL teachers’ perceptions about the role of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in their pedagogical decision-making: A phenomenological analysis. European Journal of Edu-cation, 61, e70639. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70639
Derakhshan, A., & Taghizadeh, M. S. (2025). Does artificial intelligence (AI) nurture or hinder language learners’ higher-order thinking skills (HOTS)? A phenomenological study on L2 learners’ perspectives and lived experiences. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12824
Divekar, R. R., Drozdal, J., Chabot, S., Zhou, Y., Su, H., Chen, Y., . . . & Braasch, J. (2022). Foreign language acquisition via artificial intelligence and extended reality: Design and evaluation. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(9), 2332-2360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1879162
Duan, H., & Zhao, W. (2024). The effects of educational artificial intelligence-powered applications on teachers’ perceived autonomy, professional development for online teaching, and digital burnout. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(3), 57-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i3.7659
Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107
Guo, K., Wang, J., & Chu, S. K. W. (2022). Using chatbots to scaffold EFL students’ argumentative writing. Assessing Writing, 54, 100666. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666
Heidegger, M. (Ed.) (2005). Introduction to phenomenological research. Indiana University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvt1sgpb
Huang, F., Teo, T., & Zhou, M. (2019). Factors affecting Chinese English as a foreign language teachers’ technology acceptance: A qualitative study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(1), 83-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117746168
Huang, X., Zou, D., Cheng, G., Chen, X., & Xie, H. (2023). Trends, research issues and applications of artificial intelligence in language education. Educational Technology & Society, 26(1), 112-131. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/48707971
Jerrim, J., Morgan, A., & Sims, S. (2023). Teacher autonomy: Good for pupils? Good for teachers? British Educational Research Journal, 49(6), 1187-1209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3892
Jiang, Z., Xu, Z., Pan, Z., He, J., & Xie, K. (2023). Exploring the role of artificial intelligence in facilitating assessment of writing performance in second language learning. Languages, 8(4), 247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8040247
Jiménez Raya, M., Lamb, T. E., & Vieira, F. (Eds.). (2007). Pedagogy for autonomy in language education in Europe: A framework for learner and teacher development. Authentik.
Jiménez Raya, M. J., Lamb, T. E., & Vieira, F. (Eds.). (2017). Mapping autonomy in language education: A framework for learner and teacher development. Peter Lang. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3726/b11095
Kiaer, J., & Jeon, Y. J. (2024). Humanizing AI education: The MERGE framework for supporting teachers in AI-enhanced classrooms. International Journal of Contents, 20(3), 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5392/IJoC.2024.20.3.001
Kim, J. (2024). Types of teacher-AI collaboration in K-12 classroom instruction: Chinese teachers’ perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 29(13), 17433-17465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12523-3
Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). Exploring generative artificial intelligence preparedness among university language instructors: A case study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100156
Kohnke, L., Zou, D., Ou, A. W., & Gu, M. M. (2025). Preparing future educators for AI-enhanced classrooms: Insights into AI literacy and integration. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100398
Lamb, T. (2008). Learner autonomy and teacher autonomy: Synthesising an agenda. In T. Lamb & H. Reinders (Eds.), Learner and teacher autonomy: Concepts, realities, and response (pp. 269-284). John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.1.21lam
Lamb, T., & Reinders, H. (Eds.). (2008). Learner and teacher autonomy: Concepts, realities, and response. John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.1
Le-Khanh, H., Do, K., & Tran-Thanh, V. (2024). EFL writing teachers’ agency in response to AI emergence from an ecological perspective. In P. Bui & E. Namaziandost (Eds.), Innovations in technologies for language teaching and learning (pp. 79-94). Springer Nature Switzerland. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-63447-5_5
Lin, Q., & Gao, X. (2023). Exploring the predictors of teachers’ teaching autonomy: A three-level international study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 135, 104338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104338
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic enquiry. Sage DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
Little, D. (1995). Learning as dialogue: The dependence of learner autonomy on teacher autonomy. System, 23(2), 175-182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(95)00006-6
Liu, H., Fan, J., & Xia, M. (2025). Exploring individual’s emotional and autonomous learning profiles in AI-enhanced data-driven language learning: An expanded SOR perspective. Learning and Individual Differences, 122, 102753. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102753
Paiva, V. (2011). Identity, motivation and autonomy in second language acquisition from the perspective of complex adaptive systems. In G. Murray, X. S. Gao, & T. Lamb (Eds.), Identity, motivation and autonomy in language learning (pp. 57-72). Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847693747-006
Pan, Z., & Wang, Y. (2025). From technology-challenged teachers to empowered digitalized citizens: Exploring the profiles and antecedents of teacher AI literacy in the Chinese EFL context. European Journal of Education, 60. e70020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70020
Qin, L., & Derakhshan, A. (2026). The developmental trajectory of L2 students’ positive achievement emotions and flow experience within AI-enhanced classrooms: A latent growth curve modeling (LGCM). Language Learning & Technology, 30(2), 157-179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/73685
Richards, J. C., & Farrell, T. S. (Eds.). (2005). Professional development for language teachers: Strategies for teacher learning. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667237
Rui, Y., Jin, H., Barkhuizen, G., Benson, P., & Chik. A. (Eds.). (2025). Narrative inquiry in language teaching and learning research. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003356394
Smith, R., & Erdoğan, S. (2008). Teacher–learner autonomy: Programme goals and student-teacher constructs. In T. Lamb & H. Reinders (Eds.), Learner and teacher autonomy: Concepts, realities, and response (pp. 83-103). John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.1.10erd
Solhi, M., Derakhshan, A., & Azari Noughabi, M. (2026). The potential of AI-driven informal digital learning of English for shaping L2 learners’ willingness to communicate and speaking motivation: Does L2 grit mediate? Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2026.2653171
Sun, P. P., & Mei, B. (2022). Modeling preservice Chinese-as-a-second/foreign-language teachers’ adoption of educational technology: A technology acceptance perspective. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(4), 816-839. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1750430
Tan, X., Cheng, G., & Ling, M. H. (2024). Artificial intelligence in teaching and teacher professional development: A systematic review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100355
Toohey, K. (2007). Conclusion: Autonomy/agency through sociocultural lenses. In A. Barfield & S. H. Brown (Eds.), Reconstructing autonomy in language education: Inquiry and innovation (pp. 231-242). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230596443_19
Verbeek, P. P. (2012). Expanding mediation theory. Foundations of Science, 17(4), 391-395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-011-9253-8
Verbeek, P. P. (2016). Toward a theory of technological mediation: A program for postphenomenological research. In J. K. Berg, O. Friis, & R. C. Crease (Eds.), Technoscience and postphenomenology: The Manhattan papers (pp. 189-204). Lexington Books. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781978731929.ch-0013
Wang, Y., & Guo, Y. (2026). Investigating the interplay of Chinese English as foreign language learners’ growth mindset, enjoyment, adaptability, and engagement in AI-mediated informal digital learning of English. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 42(1), e70189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcal.70189
Xu, G., Yu, A., & Liu, L. (2026). A meta-analysis examining AI-assisted L2 learning. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 64(2), 905-937. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2024-0213
Yang, C. T. Y., & Chen, H. H. J. (2026). ChatGPT and L2 Chinese writing: Evaluating the impact of model version and prompt language on automated corrective feedback. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 39(4), 1119-1147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2025.2453205
Yang, J. (2021). Understanding and enhancing Chinese TEFL teachers’ motivation for continuing professional development through the lens of self-determination theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 768320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.768320
Yang, J., & Lou, K. (2026). Exploring the nexus of self-efficacy in digital literacy and technology acceptance: Insights from L2 Chinese teachers. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 46(1), 203-221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2024.2336247
Yang, L. (2026). Empowering the autonomous learner: How AI-assisted language learning environments shape self-regulation, autonomy, and self-directed behaviors. Language Teaching Research. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688261422129
Yingsoon, G. Y., Zhang, S., & Chua, N. A. (2025). Empowering educators in the era of next-generation AI: Redefining the teacher’s role in an AI-enhanced learning environment. In E. Çela, N. R. Vajjhala, & M. M. Fonkam (Eds.), Teachers’ roles and perspectives on AI integration in schools (pp. 1-30). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-1017-6.ch001
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Zhi, R., Wang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2024). The role of emotional intelligence and self-efficacy in EFL teachers’ technology adoption. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 33(4), 845-856. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-023-00782-6
Zhou, C., & Hou, F. (2024). Can AI empower L2 education? Exploring its influence on the behavioural, cognitive and emotional engagement of EFL teachers and language learners. European Journal of Education, 59(4), e12750. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12750
Zou, D., Xie, H., & Kohnke, L. (2025). Navigating the future: Establishing a framework for educators’ pedagogic artificial intelligence competence. European Journal of Education, 60(2), e70117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70117
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ali Derakhshan, Terry Lamb
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.