Keywords
motivational changes
process-oriented view of motivation
interest and engagement
How to Cite
Number of views: 2253
Number of downloads: 1055
Abstract
When we examine the empirical investigations of motivation in second and foreign language learning, even those drawing upon the latest theoretical paradigms, such as the L2 motivational self system (Dörnyei, 2009), it becomes clear that many of them still fail to take account of its dynamic character and temporal variation. This may be surprising in view of the fact that the need to adopt such a process-oriented approach has been emphasized by a number of theorists and researchers (e.g., Dörnyei, 2000, 2001, 2009; Ushioda, 1996; Williams & Burden, 1997), and it lies at the heart of the model of second language motivation proposed by Dörnyei and Ottó (1998). It is also unfortunate that few research projects have addressed the question of how motivation changes during a language lesson as well as a series of lessons, and what factors might be responsible for fluctuations of this kind. The present paper is aimed to rectify this problem by reporting the findings of a classroom-based study which investigated the changes in the motivation of 28 senior high school students, both in terms of their goals and intentions, and their interest and engagement in classroom activities and tasks over the period of four weeks. The analysis of the data collected by means of questionnaires, observations and interviews showed that although the reasons for learning remain relatively stable, the intensity of motivation is indeed subject to variation on a minute-to-minute basis and this fact has to be recognized even in large-scale, cross-sectional research in this area.References
Bronson, M. (2000). Self-regulation in early childhood: Nature and nurture. New York: Guilford Press.
Chambers, G. N. (1999). Motivating language learners. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Clément, R. (1980). Ethnicity, contact, and communicative competence in a second language. In H. Giles, W. P. Robinson, & P. M. Smiths (Eds.), Language: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 147-154). Oxford: Pergamon.
Cowie, N., & Sakui, K. (2011). Crucial but neglected: English as a foreign language teachers’ perspectives on learner motivation. In G. Murray, X. Gao, & T. Lamb (Eds.), Identity, motivation and autonomy in language learning (pp. 212-228). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Crookes, G., & Schmidt, R. (1991). Motivation: Reopening the research agenda. Language Learning, 41, 469-512.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.
Csizér, K., & Kormos, J. (2009). Learning experiences, selves and motivated learning behavior: A comparative analysis of structural models for Hungarian secondary and university learners of English. In Z. Dörnyei & E.Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language Identity and the L2 self (pp. 98-119). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
DeBot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007). A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 7-21.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
Dörnyei, Z. (2000). Motivation in action: Towards a process-oriented conceptualization of student motivation. British Journal of Educational Psychology,70, 519-538.
Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Teaching and researching motivation. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Dörnyei, Z. (2002). The motivational basis of language learning tasks. In P. Robinson(Ed.), Individual differences in second language acquisition (pp.137-158). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The L2 motivational self system. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language Identity and the L2 self (pp. 9-42). Bristol:Multilingual Matters.
Dörnyei, Z., & Csizér, K. (2002). Some dynamics of language attitudes and motivation:Results of a longitudinal nationwide study. Applied Linguistics, 23, 421-462.
Dörnyei, Z., & Ottó, I. (1998). Motivation in action: A process model of motivation.Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 4, 43-69.
Dörnyei, Z., & Skehan, P. (2003). Individual differences in second language learning. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 589-630). Oxford: Blackwell.
Dörnyei, Z., & Taguchi, T. (2010). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. New York: Routledge.
Egbert, J. (2003). A study of flow theory in the foreign language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 87, 499-518.
Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold.
Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1959). Motivational variables in second language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 13, 266-272.
Gardner, R. C., Masgoret, A. -M., Tennant, J., & Mihic, L. (2004). Integrative motivation: Changes during a year-long intermediate-level language course. Language Learning, 81, 344-362.
Hermann, G. (1980). Attitudes and success in children’s learning of English as a second language: The motivational vs. resultative hypothesis. ELT Journal, 34, 247-54.
Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 71, 1062-1083.
Hsieh, C. -N. (2009). L2 learners’ self-appraisal of motivational changes over time. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 17, 3-26.
Inbar, O., Donitsa-Schmidt, S., & Shohamy, E. (2001). Students‘ motivation as a function of language learning: The teaching of Arabic in Israel. In Z. Dörnyei & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition(pp. 297-311). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
Koizumi, R., & Matsuo, K. (1993). A longitudinal study of attitudes and motivation in learning English among Japanese seventh grade students. Japanese Psychological Research, 35, 1-11.
Kormos, J., & Dörnyei, Z. (2004). The interaction of linguistic and motivational variables in second language task performance. Zeitschrift für Interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht [Online], 9(2), 1-19. Retrieved from http://www.ualberta.ca/~german/ejournal/kormos2.htm
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Markus, H. R., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41,954-969.
Nikolov, M. (2001). A study of unsuccessful language learners. In Z. Dörnyei & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition (pp. 147-172). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
Nitta, R., & Asano, R. (2010). Understanding motivational changes in EFL classrooms. In A. M. Stoke (Ed.), JALT 2009 Conference Proceedings (pp. 186- 196). Tokyo: JALT.
Noels, K. A. (2003). Learning Spanish as a second language: Learners’ orientations and perceptions of their teachers’ communication style. In Z. Dörnyei, (Ed.), Attitudes, orientations, and motivations in language learning (pp. 97-136). Oxford: Blackwell.
Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (2001). Changing perspectives on good language learners. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 307-322.
Ortega, L. (2009). Understanding second language acquisition. London: Hodder Education.
Pawlak, M. (Ed.). (2012). New perspectives on individual differences in language learning and teaching. Heidelberg: Springer.
Peacock, M. (1997). The effect of authentic materials on the motivation of EFL learners. ELT Journal, 51, 144-156.
Rueda, R., & Moll, L. (1994). A sociocultural perspective on motivation. In H. F. O’Neil, Jr. & M. Drillings (Eds.), Motivation: Theory and research (pp. 117-137). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Ryan, S. (2005). Motivational factors questionnaire. Nottingham, School of English Studies, University of Nottingham.
Schumann, J. H. (1998). The neurobiology of affect in language. Oxford: Blackwell.
Schumann, J. H. (2001). Appraisal psychology, neurobiology, and language.Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 23-42.
Shoaib, A., & Dörnyei, Z. (2005). Affect in life-long learning: Exploring L2 motivation as a dynamic process. In P. Benson & D. Nunan (Eds.), Learners' stories: Difference and diversity in language learning (pp. 22-41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tachibana, Y., Matskukawa, R., & Zhong, Q. X. (1996). Attitudes and motivation for learning English: A cross-national comparison of Japanese and Chinese high school students. Psychological Reports, 79, 691-700.
Taguchi, T., Magid, M., & Papi, M. (2009). The L2 motivational self system among Japanese, Chinese and Iranian learners of English: A comparative study. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language Identity and the L2 self (pp. 66-97). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Ushioda, E. (1993). Redefining motivation from the L2 learner’s point of view. Teanga, 13, 1-12.
Ushioda, E. (1996). Developing a dynamic concept of motivation. In T. Hickey& J. Williams (Eds.), Language, education and society in a changing world (pp. 239-245). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Ushioda, E. (2001). Motivation as a socially mediated process. In Z. Dörnyei & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition (pp. 91-124). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
Ushioda, E. (2003). Motivation as a socially mediated process. In D. Little, J. Ridley,& E. Ushioda (Eds.), Learner autonomy in the foreign language classroom:Teacher, learner, curriculum, assessment (pp. 90-102). Dublin: Authentik.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Weiner, B. (1992). Human motivation: Metaphors, theories and research.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Williams, M., & Burden, R. (1997). Psychology for language teachers. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
Williams, M., Burden, R., & Lanvers, U. (2002). ‘French is the language of love and stuff’: Student perceptions of issues related to motivation in learning a foreign language. British Educational Research Journal, 28, 503-528.
License
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.