Abstract
In this paper, a review of the role of input, output and instruction in second language acquisition is provided. Several pedagogical interventions in grammar instruction (e.g., processing instruction, input enhancement, structured output and collaborative output tasks) are presented and their effectiveness reviewed. A final and overall evaluation is provided at the end of the paper.
References
Angelovska, T., & Benati, A. (2013). Processing instruction and the age factor: Can adults and school-age native speakers of German process English simple past tense correctly? In A. Benati & J. Lee (Eds.), Individual differences and processing instruction (pp. 131-153). London: Equinox.
Benati, A. (2013). Key issues in second language teaching. London: Equinox.
Benati, A. (2016). Input manipulation, enhancement and processing: Theoretical views and empirical research. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6, 65-88.
Benati, A., & Lee, J. (2008). Grammar acquisition and processing instruction: Secondary and cumulative effects. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Benati, A., & Lee, J. (2010). Processing instruction and discourse. London: Continuum.
Benati, A., & Angelovska, T. (2015). The effects of processing instruction on the acquisition of English past simple tense: Age and cognitive tasks demands. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL), 53, 249-269.
Benati, A., & Lee, J. (Eds.). (2015). Processing instruction: New insights after twenty years of theory, research and application [Special issue]. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 53(2).
Benati, A., & Batziou, M. (2017). The relative effects of isolated and combined structured input and structured output on the acquisition of the English causative
forms. IRAL. Advance online publication. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2016-0038
Benati, A., & Farhat, A. (2017). MSA gender agreement and motivation: A processing instruction study. Manuscript in preparation.
Carroll, S. (2001). Input and evidence: The raw material of second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Chomsky, N. (2005). Three factors in language design. Linguistic Enquiry, 36, 1-22.
Collins, L., & Ellis, N. (2009). Input and second language construction learning: Frequency, form, and function. Modern Language Journal, 93, 329-335.
Corder, P. S. (1967). The significance of learners’ errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 5, 161-170.
DeKeyser, R. (2015). Skill acquisition theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (2nd ed.) (pp. 94-112). New York: Routledge.
Ellis, N. (2007). The associative-cognitive CREED. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 77-95). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ellis, N., & Wulff, S. (2015). Usage-based approaches to SLA. B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (2nd ed.) (pp. 75-93). New York: Routledge.
Ellis, R. (1997). SLA research and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Farley, A. (2005). Structured input: Grammar instruction for the acquisition-oriented and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gass, S. (2003). Input and interaction. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 224-255). Oxford: Blackwell.
Gass, S., & Mackey, A. (2006). Input, interaction and output: An overview. In K. Bardovi-Harlig & Z. Dörnyei (Eds.), Themes in SLA research (pp. 3-17). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gass, S., & Mackey, A. (2015). Input, interaction and output in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams, J. (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (2nd ed.) (pp. 180-206). New York: Routledge.
Krashen, S. (1982). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
Krashen, S. (2009). The comprehension hypothesis extended. In T. Piske & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), Input matters (pp. 81-94). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Lantolf, J., Thorne, S., & Poehner, E. (2015). Sociocultural theory and second language development. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams, J. (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (2nd ed.) (pp. 207-226). New York: Routledge.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2015). Research into practice: Grammar learning and teaching. Language Teaching, 48, 263-280.
Lee, J., & VanPatten, B. (2003). Making communicative language teaching happen. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Lee, J., & Benati, A. (2007a). Delivering processing instruction in classrooms and in virtual contexts: Research and practice. London: Equinox.
Lee, J., & Benati, A. (2007b). Second language processing: An analysis of theory, problems and possible solutions. New York: Continuum.
Lee, J., & Benati, A. (2009). Research and perspectives on processing instruction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Lee, J., & Benati, A. (Eds.). (2013). Individual differences and processing instruction. Sheffield: Equinox.
Lee, S.-K., & Huang, H. (2008). Visual input enhancement and grammar learning: A meta-analytic review. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 307-331.
Leeser, M. (2017). A research synthesis and meta-analysis of Processing Instruction. Manuscript in preparation.
Long, M. (2007). Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Montrul, S. (2009). Re-examining the fundamental difference hypothesis: What can early bilinguals tell us? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 225-57.
Nassaji, H., & Fotos, S. (2011). Teaching grammar in second language classrooms. New York: Routledge.
Nassaji, H. (2016). Research timeline: Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition. Language Teaching, 49, 35-62.
O’Grady, W., Lee, M., & Kwak, H. Y. (2009). Emergentism and second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bathis (Eds.), The new handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 69-88). Bingley: Emerald.
Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A., & Pawlak, M. (2012). Production-oriented and comprehension-based grammar teaching in the foreign language classroom. Heidelberg: Springer.
Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning, 44, 493-527.
Pienemann, M. (1998). Language processing and L2 development. New York: Benjamins.
Pienemann, M., & Lenzing, A. (2015). Processability theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (2nd ed.) (pp. 159-179). New York: Routledge.
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129-158.
Sharwood Smith, M. (1991). Speaking to many minds: On the relevance of different types of language information for the L2 learner. Second Language Research, 7, 118-132.
Sharwood Smith, M. (1993). Input enhancement in instructed SLA: Theoretical bases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 165-179.
Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17, 38-62.
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principles and practice in applied linguistics (pp. 125-144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction: Theory and research, Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
VanPatten, B. (2003). From input to output: A teacher’s guide to second language acquisition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
VanPatten, B. (Ed.). (2004). Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
VanPatten, B. (2015a). Input processing in adult SLA. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (2nd ed.) (pp. 113-135). New York: Routledge.
VanPatten, B. (2015b). Foundations of processing. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 53, 91-109.
VanPatten, B., & Sanz, C. (1995). From input to output: Processing instruction and communicative tasks. In F. R. Eckman, D. Highland, P. W. Lee, J. Mileham, & R. R. Weber (Eds.), Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy (pp. 169-185). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
VanPatten, B., & Jegerski, J. (2010). Research in second language processing and parsing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
VanPatten, B., & Rothman, J. (2014). Against rules. In A. Benati, C. Laval, & M. Arche (Eds.), The grammar dimension in instructed second language learning (pp. 15-35). London: Bloomsbury.
Wajnryb, R. (1990). Grammar dictation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
White, L. (2003). Second language acquisition and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
White, L. (2015). Linguistic theory, universal grammar, and second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams, J. (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (2nd ed.) (pp.34-53). New York: Routledge.
Whong, M., Gil, K., & H. Marsden (Eds.). (2013). Universal grammar and the language classroom. Heidelberg: Springer.
Wong, W. (2004). Processing instruction in French: The roles of explicit information and structured input. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 187-205). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wong, W. (2005). Input enhancement: From theory and research to the classroom. New York: McGraw-Hill
License
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.