Abstract
In this paper, we discuss the problem of articulation between levels in the educational system, as the transition from a rather more communicative, contentbased and holistic approach to English as a foreign language (EFL) teaching at primary level to more formal and explicit ways of foreign language (FL) teaching at secondary is often experienced as problematic by students and teachers alike (see, e.g., Muñoz, Tragant, & Camuñas, 2015). The results of a mixed methods analysis are presented, in which we analyzed, through a questionnaire and language experience essays, perceived continuity between input received in primary school and secondary school, as well as learners’ beliefs, attitudes and self-efficacy before and after they transitioned to secondary school. Twelve primary schools and six secondary schools in Switzerland participated in the study, with a total of 280 early learners of EFL (biological age 12-13 years, age of onset 8 years). We will argue that one of the main reasons why early FL instruction seems not to bear fruit later in secondary school is that, on the one hand, coherence in curriculum design and practice vary in a few—but crucial—aspects within and between primary schools. On the other hand, the fact that secondary education becomes a meeting point for mixed ability classes also seems to mitigate the potential advantages of an earlier start.
References
Barton, A., & Bragg, J. (2010). Springboard to languages project: Phase 3 report. University of Manchester.
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2016). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.0-6. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
Blondin, C., Candelier, M., Edelenbos, P., Johnstone, R., Kubanek-German, A., & Taeschner, T. (1998). Foreign languages in primary and pre-school education: A review of recent research within the European Union. London: CILT.
Börner, O., Engel, G., & Groot-Wilken, B. (Eds.). (2013). Hörverstehen – Leseverstehen – Sprechen. Diagnose und Förderung von sprachlichen Kompetenzen im Englischunterricht der Primarstufe. Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
Chambers, G. N. (2014). Transition in modern languages from primary to secondary school: The challenge of change. Language Learning Journal, 42(3), 242-260.
Chaudron, C. (2001). Progress in language classroom research: Evidence from Modern Language Journal, 1916-2000. Modern Language Journal, 85, 57-76.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2007). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing Grounded Theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Courtney, L. (2014). Moving from primary to secondary education: An investigation into the effect of primary to secondary transition on motivation for language learning and foreign language proficiency (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Southampton.
Courtney, L., Graham, S., Tonkyn, A., & Marinis, T. (2015). Individual differences in early language learning: A study of English learners of French. Applied Linguistics. doi: 10.1093/applin/amv071
Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The psychology of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dörnyei, Z. (2010). Questionnaires in second language research. Construction, administration, and processing (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
EDK-Ost (Erziehungsdirektoren-Konferenz Ostschweiz). (2009). Lehrplan Englisch. Primarstufe und Sekundarstufe I. Retrieved from http://www.vsa.zh.ch/content/dam/bildungsdirektion/vsa/schulbetrieb/lehrplaene_lehrmittel/lehrplan_englisch.pdf
Ellis, N. C. (Ed.). (1994). Implicit and explicit learning of languages. London: Academic Press.
Ellis, N. C. (2009). Optimizing the input: Frequency and sampling in usage-based and form-focussed learning. In M. H. Long & C. Doughty (Eds.), Handbook of language teaching (pp. 139-158). Oxford: Blackwell.
Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analyzing learner language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
European Commission. (2004). Promoting language learning and linguistic diversity: An action plan 2004-2006. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
García Mayo, M. P. (2003). Age, length of exposure and grammaticality judgements in the acquisition of English as a Foreign Language. In M. P. García Mayo & M. L. García Lecumberri (Eds.), Age and the acquisition of English as a foreign language (pp. 94-114). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2008). Second language acquisition: An introductory course (3rd ed.). New York, Routledge.
Graham, S., Courtney, L., Tonkyn, A., & Marinis, T. (2016). Motivational trajectories for early language learning across the primary-secondary school transition. British Educational Research Journal, 42(4), 682-702.
Gregersen, T., & MacIntyre, P. (2014). Emotions that facilitate language learning: The positive-broadening power of the imagination. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2(2), 193-213.
Housen, A., & Pierrard, M. (2005). Investigating instructed second language acquisition. In A. Housen & M. Pierrard (Eds.), Studies on Language Acquisition: Vol. 25. Investigations in instructed second language acquisition (pp.1-27). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Jaekel, N., Schurig, M., Merle, F., & Ritter, M. (2017). From early starters to late finishers? A longitudinal study of early foreign language learning in school. Language Learning, 67, 631-664.
Johnstone, R. (2009). An early start: What are the key conditions for generalized success? In J. Enever, J. Moon, & U. Raman (Eds.), Young learner English language policy and implementation: International perspectives (pp. 31-42). Reading: Garnet Education Publishing Ltd.
Jones, J. (2016). Transition from primary to secondary language learning: Using an assessment for learning approach to unpack pupils’ ‘suitcases of skills and abilities.’ Babylonia, 2, 79-83.
Lamb, M. (2007). The impact of school on EFL learning motivation: An Indonesian case study, TESOL Quarterly, 41(4), 757-780.
Larson-Hall, J. (2008). Weighing the benefits of studying a foreign language at a younger starting age in a minimal input situation. Second Language Research, 24, 35-63.
Lichtman, K. (2013). Developmental comparisons of implicit and explicit language learning. Language Acquisition, 20(2), 93-108.
Linck, J. A., & Cunnings, I. (2015). The utility and application of mixed-effects models in second language research. Language Learning, 65 (Supplement 1), 185-207.
Milton, J., & Alexiou, T. (2006). Language aptitude development in young learners. In C. Abello-Contesse, R. Chacón-Beltrán, M. D. López-Chiménez, & M. M. Torreblanca-López (Eds.), Age in L2 acquisition and teaching (pp.177-192). Oxford: Peter Lang.
Mitchell, R., Myles, F., & Marsden, E. (2013). Second language learning theories (3rd ed.). New York/London: Routledge.
Muñoz, C. (2009). Input and long-term effects of early learning in a formal setting. In M. Nikolov (Ed.), Contextualizing the age factor: Issues in early foreign language learning (pp. 141-160). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Muñoz, C., Tragant E., & Camuñas M. (2015). Transition: Continuity or a fresh start? APAC Quarterly, 89, 11-16.
Nikolov, M. (2017). Students’ and teachers’ feedback on diagnostic tests for young EFL learners: Implications for classrooms. In M. P. García-Mayo (Ed.), Learning foreign languages in primary school: Research insights (pp.249-266). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Nikolov, M., & Mihaljevic Djigunovic, J. (2011). All shades of every color: An overview of early teaching and learning of foreign languages. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 95-119.
Pfenninger, S. E., & Singleton, D. (2017). Beyond age effects in instructional L2 learning: Revisiting the age factor. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Prabhu, N. S. (2009). Teaching English to young learners: The promise and the threat. In J. Enever, J. Moon, & U. Raman (Eds.), Young learner English language policy and implementation: international perspectives (pp. 43-44).
Reading, UK: Garnet Education Publishing. R Development Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Schmidt, R. W. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tarone, E., Bigelow, M., & Hansen, K. (2009). Literacy and second language oracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tellier, A., & Roehr-Brackin, K. (2017). Raising children’s metalinguistic awareness to enhance classroom second language learning. In M. P. García-Mayo (Ed.), Learning foreign languages in primary school: Research insights (pp. 22-48). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Ushioda, E. (2014). Motivational perspectives on the self in SLA: A developmental view. In S. Mercer & M. Williams (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on the self in SLA. Second language acquisition (pp. 127-141). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
License
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.