Keywords
tense
aspect
closely-related languages
language transfer
How to Cite
Number of views: 947
Number of downloads: 464
Abstract
This paper examines the process of acquiring L2s that are closely related to the L1 through data on how adult French speakers learning L2 Spanish in a formal setting develop knowledge and use of past tenses in this L2. We consider the role of transfer and simplification in acquiring mental representations of the L2 grammar, specifically in the area of tense and aspect, and how learners deal with integrating grammatically encoded, lexical and discursive information, including mismatching feature combinations leading to particular inferential effects on interpretation. Data is presented on the Spanish past tenses (simple and compound past, pluperfect, imperfect and progressive forms) from two tasks, an oral production filmretell and a multiple-choice interpretation task, completed by learners at A2, B1, B2 and C1 CEFR levels (N = 20-24 per level). L1 influence is progressively attenuated as proficiency increases. Difficulties were not always due to negative L1 transfer, but related also to grammar-discourse interface issues when integrating linguistic and pragmatic information in the interpretation process. This has clear implications for the teaching of closely related languages: instruction should not only focus on crosslinguistic contrasts, but also prioritize uses requiring complex interface integration, which are harder to process.
References
Amenós-Pons, J. (2010). Los tiempos de pasado del español y el francés: Semántica, pragmática y aprendizaje de E/LE. Perspectivas desde la Teoría de la Relevancia (Unpublished PhD thesis). Madrid: UNED.
Amenós-Pons, J. (2015). Spanish ‘Imperfecto’ vs. French ‘Imparfait’ in hypothetical clauses: A procedural account. Cahiers Chronos, 27, 243-271.
Andersen, R. W., & Shirai, Y. (1996). Primacy of aspect in first and second language acquisition: The pidgin/creole connection. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 527-570). San Diego: Academic Press.
Ayoun, D., & Rothman, J. (2013). Generative approaches to the L2 acquisition of temporal-aspectual-mood systems. In M. R. Salaberry & Ll. Comajoan (Eds.), Research design and methodology in studies on L2 tense and aspect (pp. 119-156). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Azzopardi, S. (2011). Le futur et le conditionnel: Valeur en langue et effets de sens en discours. Analyse contrastive espagnol/français (Unpublished PhD thesis). Montpellier: Université Paul Valéry - Montpellier III.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1994). Anecdote or evidence? Evaluating support for hypotheses concerning the development of tense and aspect. In S. Gass, A. Cohen, & E. Tarone (Eds.), Research methodology in second language acquisition (pp. 41-60). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2000). Tense and aspect in second language acquisition: Form, meaning and use. Malden: Blackwell.
Bertinetto, P. M. (2000). The progressive in Romance, as compared with English. In Ö. Dahl (Ed.), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe (pp. 559-604). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Comajoan, L. (2014). Tense and aspect in second language Spanish. In K. L. Gesleen (Ed.), The handbook of Spanish second language acquisition (pp. 235-252). Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell.
Corblin, F., & De Swart, H. (2003). Handbook of French semantics. Chicago: CSLI Publications.
Dahl, Ö., & Hedin, E. (2000). Current relevance and event reference. In Ö. Dahl (Ed.), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe (pp. 386-401). Berlin, Mouton De Gruyter.
De Mulder, W. (2010). Mood in French. In B. Rothstein & R. Thieroff (Eds.), Mood in the languages of Europe (pp. 157-178). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Díaz, L., Bel, A., & Bekiou, K. (2007). The role of morphological features in the acquisition of Spanish aspectual differences. In J. Liceras, H. Zobl, & H.
Goodluck (Eds.), The role of formal features in second language acquisition (pp. 485-511). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Dietrich, R., Klein, W., & Noyau, C. (Eds.). (1995). The acquisition of temporality in a second language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Escandell-Vidal, V., & Leonetti, M. (2003). On the quotative readings of Spanish imperfecto. Cuadernos de Lingüística, X, 135-154.
Gosselin, L. (1999). La valeur de l’imparfait et du conditionnel dans les systèmes hypothétiques, Cahiers Chronos, 4, 29-51.
Laca, B. (2010). Mood in Spanish. In B. Rothstein & R. Thieroff (Eds.), Mood in the languages of Europe (pp. 198-220). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lardiere, D. (2008). Feature assembly in second language in second language acquisition. In J. Liceras, H. Zobl & H. Goodluck (Eds.), Features in second language acquisition (pp. 106-140). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lardiere, D. (2009). Some thoughts on a contrastive analysis of feature in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 25(2), 173-227.
Lindstedt, J. (2000). The perfect: Aspectual, temporal and evidential. In Ö. Dahl (Ed.), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe (pp. 365-384). Berlin, Mouton De Gruyter.
Lorenzo, C. de. (2002). Les relations temporo-aspectuelles dans le récit oral en français et en castillan, langues premières et langues étrangères (Unpublished PhD thesis). Nanterre: Université de Nanterre – Paris X.
Montrul, S. (2004). Interpreting mood distinctions in Spanish as a heritage language. In K. Potowski & R. Cameron (Eds.), Spanish in contact. Policy, social and linguistic inquiries (pp. 23-40). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Montrul, S., & Slabakova, R. (2002). Acquiring morphosyntactic and semantic properties of preterite and imperfect tenses in L2 Spanish. In. A. T. Pérez-Leroux & J. Liceras (Eds.), The acquisition of Spanish morphosyntax: The L1-L2 Connection (pp. 113-149). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Real Academia Española/Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española. (2009). Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa.
Salaberry, R. (1999). The development of past tense verbal morphology in classroom L2 Spanish. Applied Linguistics, 20(2), 151-178.
Salaberry, R. (2011). Assessing the effect of lexical aspect and grounding on the acquisition of L2 Spanish past tense morphology among L1 English speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 184-202.
Sharwood Smith, M., & Truscott, J. (2014). The multilingual mind. A modular processing perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sorace, A., & Filiaci, F. (2006). Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research, 22(3), 339-368.
Sorace, A., & Serratrice, L. (2009). Internal and external interfaces in bilingual language development: Beyond structural overlap. Interlanguage Journal of Bilingualism, 13, 1-16.
Sorace, A. (2011). Pinning down the concept of ‘interface’ in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1(1), 1-33.
VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction: Theory and research. Nordwood, NJ: Ablex.
License
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.