Keywords
irregular verb morphology
analogy
pattern associator
apophony
How to Cite
Number of views: 496
Number of downloads: 369
Abstract
This paper examines possible psycholinguistic mechanisms governing stem vowel changes of irregular verbs in intermediate English learners of German as a foreign language (GFL). In Experiment 1, nonce-infinitives embedded in an authentic fictional text had to be inflected for German preterite, thus testing possible analogy driven pattern associations. Experiment 2 explored the psycholinguistic reality of the so-called apophonic path by prompting two inflections for one given nonce-word. Data were analyzed using generalized mixed effects models accounting for within-subject as well as within-item variance. The results of Experiment 1 and 2 support the notion of a pattern associator and yield only scarce evidence for the psycholinguistic reality of a universal apophonic path. Therefore, the organization of irregular verb morphology in the mental lexicon of intermediate GFL learners might best be captured by the linguistic notion of structured lexical entries as well as the psycholinguistic mechanism of an analogy-based pattern associator.
References
Aha, D. W., Kibler, D., & Albert, M. K. (1991). Instance-based learning algorithms. Machine Learning, 6, 37-66. doi: 10.1007/BF00153759
Albright, A. (2009). Modeling analogy as probabilistic grammar. In J. P. Blevins & J. Blevins (Eds.), Analogy in grammar. Form and acquisition (pp. 185-204). New York: Oxford University Press.
Albright, A., & Hayes, B. (2003). Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: A computational/experimental study. Cognition, 90(2), 119-161. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00146-X
Anderson, S. R. (1988). Morphological theory. In F. J. Newmeyer (Ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge survey. Vol. I. Linguistic theory: Foundations (pp. 146-191). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baayen, R. H. (2003). Probabilistic approaches to morphology. In R. Bod, J. B. Hay, & S. Jannedy (Eds.), Probabilistic linguistics (pp. 229-287). Cambridge, MA.
Baayen, R. H., & Hay, J. B. (2005). Shifting paradigms: Gradient structure in morphology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(7), 342-348. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.04.002
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390-412. doi: org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255-278. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
Bates D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1-48. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Becker, T. (1990). Analogie und morphologische Theorie. München: Wilhelm Fink.
Berko, J. (1958). The child’s learning of English morphology. Word, 14, 150-77. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1958.11659661
Bittner, A. (1996). Starke ‘schwache’ Verben, schwache ‘starke’ Verben. Deutsche Verbflexion und Natürlichkeit. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
Burgess, A. (1972). A clockwork orange. London: Penguin.
Bybee, J. (1988). Morphology as lexical organisation. In M. Hammond & M. Noonam (Eds.), Theoretical approaches to morphology (pp. 119-141). San Diego: Academic Press.
Bybee, J. (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10(5), 425-455. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690969508407111
Bybee, J., & Newman, J. (1995). Are stem changes as natural as affixes? Linguistics, 33(4), 633-654. doi: 10.1515/ling.1995.33.4.633
Bybee, J., & Moder, C. L. (1983). Morphological classes as natural categories. Language, 59, 251-270. doi: 10.2307/413574
Bybee, J., & Slobin, D. I. (1982). Rules and schemas in the development and use of the English past tense. Language, 58, 265-289. doi: 10.2307/414099
Clahsen, H. (1997). The representation of German participles in the German mental lexicon: Evidence for the dual-mechanism model. In G. Booij & J. v. Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1996 (pp. 73-96). Dodrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Clahsen, H. (1999). Lexical entries and rules of language: A multidisciplinary study of German inflection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 991-1060. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X99002228
Clahsen, H., Eisenbeiß, S., & Sonnenstuhl-Henning, I. (1997). Morphological structure and the processing of inflected words. Theoretical Linguistics, 23, 201-249. doi: 10.1515/thli.1997.23.3.201
Clahsen, H., Felser, C., Neubauer, K., Sato, M., & Silva, R. (2010). Morphological structure in native and nonnative language processing. Language Learning, 60, 21-43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000648
Clahsen, H., Hadler, M., & Weyerts, H. (2004). Speeded production of inflected words in children and adults. Journal Child Language, 31(3), 683-712. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0305000904006506
Council of Europe (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cunnings, I., & Finlayson, I. (2015). Mixed effects modeling and longitudinal data analysis. In L. Plonsky (Ed.), Advancing quantitative methods in second language research (pp. 159-181). New York: Routledge.
Cunnings, I., & Linck, J. A. (2015). The utility and application of mixed-effects models in second language research. Language Learning, 65(1), 185-207. doi: 10.1111/lang.12117
Daelemans, W., Zavrel, J., van der Sloot, K., & van den Bosch, A. (1999). TiMBL: Tilburg Memory Based Learner, version 2.0, reference guide. Induction of linguistic knowledge technical report. Tilburg, Netherlands: ILK Research Group.
Eddington, D. (2000). Analogy and the dual-route model of morphology. Lingua, 110(4), 281-298. doi: 10.1.1.123.9060
Eddington, D. (2004). Issues in modelling language processing analogically. Lingua, 114(7), 849-871. doi: 10.1016/S0024-3841(03)00063-9
Godfroid, A., & Uggen, M. S. (2013). Attention to irregular verbs by beginning learners of German. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(2), 291-322. doi: 10.1017/S0272263112000897
Goebel, R., & Indefrey, P. (2000). A recurrent network with short-term memory capacity learning the German s-plural. In P. Broeder & J. Murre (Eds.), Models of language acquisition. Inductive and deductive approaches (pp.177-200). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gor, K., & Chernigovskaya, T. (2005). Formal instruction and the acquisition of verbal morphology. In A. Housen & M. Pierrard (Eds.), Investigations in instructed second language acquisition (pp. 131-166). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Gries, S. T. (2015). The most under-used statistical method in corpus linguistics: Multi-level (and mixed-effects) models. Corpora, 10(1), 95-125. doi: 10.3366/cor.2015.0068
Hahne, A., Müller, J., & Clahsen, H. (2006). Morphological processing in a second language: Behavioural and event-related potential evidence for storage and decomposition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 121-134. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/089892906775250067
Hothorn, T., Hornik, K., & Zeileis, A. (2006). Unbiased recursive partitioning: A conditional inference framework. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 15(3), 651-674. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1198/106186006X133933
Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 434-446. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
Köpcke, K.-M. (1998). Prototypisch starke und schwache Verben in der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Germanistische Linguistik, 141-142, 45-60.
Lemhöfer, K., & Radach, R. (2009). Task context effects in bilingual nonword processing. Experimental Psychology, 56(1), 41-47. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.56.1.41
Lück, M., Hahne, A., & Clahsen, H. (2006). Brain potentials to morphologically complex words during listening. Brain Research, 1077, 144-152. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2006.01.030
Marusch, T., von der Malsbur, T., Bastiaanse, R., & Burchert, F. (2012). Tense morphology in German agrammatism. The production of regular, irregular and mixed verbs. The Mental Lexicon, 7(3), 351-380. doi: 10.1075/ml.7.3.05mar
Murphy, V. A. (2004). Dissociable systems in second language inflectional morphology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(3), 433-459. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263104263033
Neubauer, K., & Clahsen, H. (2009). Decomposition of inflected words in a second language: An experimental study of German participles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 403-435. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109090354
Nübling, D., Dammel, A., Duke, J., & Szczepaniak, R. (2006). Historische Sprachwissenschaft des Deutschen: Eine Einführung in die Prinzipien des Sprachwandels. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
Orsolini M., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1997). Universals in morphological representation: Evidence from Italian. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 1-47. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/016909697386899
Penke, M. (2006). Flexion im mentalen Lexikon. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
Penke, M., Wimmer, E., Hennies, J., Hess, M., & Rothweiler, M. (2014). Inflectional morphology in German hearing-impaired children. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 41(1), 9-26. doi: 10.3109/14015439.2014.940382
Pinker, S. (1999).Words and rules. The ingredients of language. London: Phoenix.
Pinker, S., & Ullman, M. T. (2002). Combination and structure, not gradedness, is the issue. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 472-474. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)02013-2
Pliatsikas, C., & Marinis, T. (2013). Processing of regular and irregular past tense morphology in highly proficient L2 learners of English: A self-paced reading study. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 943-970. doi: 10.1017/S0142716412000082
Prasada, S., & Pinker, S. (1993). Generalization of regular and irregular morphological patterns. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 1-56. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0169096930840694
R Core Team (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/
Ramscar, M. J. A. (2002). The role of meaning in inflection: Why the past tense does not require a rule. Cognitive Psychology, 45, 45-94. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0285(02)00001-4
Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104(3), 192-232. doi: doi.apa.org/journals/xge/104/3/192.pdf
Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblance: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573-605. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9
Ruh, N., & Westermann, G. (2008). A Single-mechanism dual-route model of German verb inflection. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 2209-2214). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Ségéral, P., & Scheer, T. (1998). A generalized theory of ablaut: The case of modern German strong verbs. In R. Fabri, A. Ortmann, & T. Parodi (Eds.), Models of inflection (pp. 28-59). Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Skousen, R. (1989). Analogical modeling of language. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Smolka, E., Khader, P. H., Wiese, R., Zwitserlood, P., & Rösler, F. (2013). Electrophysiological evidence for the continuous processing of linguistic categories of regular and irregular verb inflection in German. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(8), 1284-1304. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00384
Smolka, E., Zwitserlood, P., & Rösler, F. (2007). Stem access in regular and irregular inflection: Evidence from German participles. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(3), 325-347. doi: dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.04.005
Strobach, T., & Schönpflug, U. (2011). Can a connectionist model explain the processing of regularly and irregularly inflected words in German as L1 and L2? International Journal of Bilingualism, 15(4), 446-465. doi: 10.1177/1367006911403205
Thiele, J., & Markussen, B. (2012). Potential of GLMM in modelling invasive spread. CAB Reviews, 7, 1-10. doi: 10.1079/PAVSNNR20127016
Trompelt, H., Bordag, D., & Pechmann, T. (2013). (Ir)regularity of verbs revisited: Evidence for lexical entry complexity. The Mental Lexicon, 8(1), 26-52. doi: 10.1075/ml.8.1.02tro
Ullman, M. T. (2001). A neurocognitive perspective on language: The declarative/procedural model. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 2(10), 717-726. doi: 10.1038/35094573
Wagner, T. (2010). Interlanguage morphology. Irregular verbs in the mental lexicon of German-English interlanguage speakers. Tübingen: Narr-Francke-Attempto.
Westermann, G., Willshaw, D., & Penke, M. (1999). A constructivist neural network model of German verb inflections in agrammatic aphasia. In Proceedings of ICANN99 (pp. 916-921). Edinburgh: IET Publishing.
Whitaker, H. A. (2006). Words in the mind, words in the brain: Preface to inaugural issue of The Mental Lexicon. The Mental Lexicon, 1(1), 3-5. doi: 10.1075/ml.1.1.02wh
Wiese, B. (2008): Form and function of verbal ablaut in contemporary standard German. In R. Sackmann (Ed.), Explorations in integrational linguistics. Four essays on German, French, and Guaraní (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 285) (pp. 97-151). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wiese, R. (2000). The phonology of German. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wunderlich, D. (1996). Minimalist morphology: The role of paradigms. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1995 (pp. 93-114). Dodrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Wunderlich, D., & Fabri, R. (1995). Minimalist morphology: An approach to inflection. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 14(2), 236-294. doi: 10.1515/zfsw.1995.14.2.236
License
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.