Abstrakt
Cynics as the poetics and worldview of imagism suggests, gives the impression of a kind of novel-rebellion against Russian literary culture that has developed since the era of Pushkin. This is despite the fact that Mariengof at the end of the 1920s, when predictably dominated by social-political issues, creates a novel about a love story, seemingly quite traditional for Russian literature. This novel is not only about a love story, however, but also about adultery, proposed almost as a norm in married life. This violates and partly as it were destroys the traditions developed by the Russian literary process in the sphere of motives. Love stories and adulteries are inscribed in the motif, gradually gaining strength, of marital unfaithfulness which increases the independent poetics in Russian literature. According to literary scholars, adultery has its origins in the prose of Pushkin, and Lermontov, and it is further developed by Leo Tolstoy. However, researchers have not paid enough attention to the genres of the romantic, secular novella of the 1820s–1840s, with Turgenev’s works as another line of adultery, largely autonomous, experiencing the natural influence of the European
medieval tradition. From this angle, the motif of adultery in Cynics has an “external” dimension, correlating with historical time, a catastrophic social-political situation, and internal literary history, as Veselovsky designated it. This naturally and inextricably connects the novel with the thickness of national and Western European literary meanings, images, types of heroes, and conflicts.
Bibliografia
Amman, Elizabeth. Importing Madame Bovary. The politics of adultery. Web. 06.05.2024. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1057/9780312376147#bibliographic-information.
Averin, Boris. „Proza Mariengofa”. Anatolij Mariengof. Roman bez vranʹâ. Ciniki. Moj vek, moâ molodostʹ. Leningrad, Hudožestvennaâ literatura, 1988, s. 473–479.
Bazanov, Mihail. „Vzglâdomistorika: glavnyj geroj romana A.B. Mariengofa «Ciniki» kak predstavitelʹ professionalʹnogo soobŝestva svoego vremeni”. Čelâbinskij gumanitarij, 4 (29), 2014. Web. 06.05.2024. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/vzglyadom-istorika-glavnyy-geroy-romana--a-b-mariengofa-tsiniki-kak-predstavitel-professionalnogo-soobschestva-svoego-vremeni.
Belaš, Ekaterina. Žanrovaâ poètika romanov A. Mariengofa. Avtoreferat dissertacii kandidata filologicheskih nauk. Moskva, 2021. Web. 06.05.2024. https://imli.ru/images/Diss_2021_Belash/Belash_avtoreferat.pdf.
Bowne, Walter. „Don Quixote and Emma Bovary”. Literary legends and the comic and tragic imitation of Art. 13.12.2021. Web. 06.05.2024. https://baos.pub/don-quixote-and-emma-bovary-77a4ce92034.
Čipenko, Galina. Hudožestvennaâ proza A. Mariengofa 20-h godov. Avtoreferat dissertacii kandidata filologicheskih nauk. Moskva, 2003. Web. 06.05.2024. https://dspace.kpfu.ru/xmlui/bitstream/handle/net/153774/0-741737.pdf?sequence=-1.
Deepika, Shekhawat. „The theme of adultery and sainthood in the select novels of Graham Greene”. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research, vol. 10, 3 (1), 2021, s. 119–123. Web. 06.05.2024. http://s3-ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com/ijmer/pdf/volume10/volume-10-issue3(1)/23.pdf.
Fanina, Marina. „Adyulter v otechestvennom kino: ot ottepeli k koncu sovetskoj epohi”. Vestnik VGIK, 2 (28), 2016, s. 34–44. Web. 06.05.2024. https://journals.eco-vector.com/2074-0832/article/view/14704/ru_RU.
Fox, Soledad. „Flaubert and Don Quijote: The influence of Cervantes on Madame Bovary”.
Paperback. Sussex Academic Press, October 8, 2010. Web. 06.05.2024. https://academic.oup.com/fmls/article-abstract/47/1/107/618304?redirectedFrom=fulltext.
Gorʹkovskaâ, Natalʹâ. Hudožestvennaâ fenomenologiâ èmocionalʹnoj žizni v romane L.N. Tolstogo
„Anna Karenina”: styd i vina. Avtoreferat dissertacii kandidata filologicheskih nauk. Volgograd, 2005. Web. 06.05.2024. https://dspace.kpfu.ru/xmlui/bitstream/handle/net/154416/0-753190.pdf?sequence=-1.
Gornaâ, Valentina. Mir čitaet „Annu Kareninu”. Moskva, Kniga, 1979.
Gromova-Opulʹskaâ, Lidiâ. „A.S. Puškin u istokov Anny Kareninoj: Tekstologiâ i poètika”. Slavânskie literatury. Kulʹtura i folʹklorslavânskih narodov. Moskva, Nauka, 1998, s. 162–171.
Gureeva, Natalʹâ. Poètika romana L.N. Tolstogo „Anna Karenina”: bessoznatelʹnoe, hudožestvennoe vremâ, cvetovaâ obraznostʹ. Avtoreferat dissertacii kandidata filologicheskih nauk. Nižnij Novgorod, 2006. Web. 06.05.2024. http://www.dslib.net/russkaja-literatura/pojetika-romana-ln-tolstogo-anna-karenina-bessoznatelnoe-hudozhestvennoe-vremja.html.
Halizev, Valentin. Cennostnye orientiry russkoj klassiki. Moskva, Gnozis, 2005.
Hamadallah, Abdulkarim Musir. The concept of adultery in selected American novels. February 2013. Web. 06.05.2024. https://www.iasj.net/iasj/download/e990241366672f4d.
Huttunen, Tomi. Imažinist Мariengof: Dendi. Montaž. Ciniki. Helʹsinki, Kafedra Slavistiki universiteta Helʹsinki, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2007. Web. 06.05.2024. https://royallib.com/book/huttunen_tomi/imaginist_mariengof_dendi_montag_tsiniki.html.
Isaev, Grigorij. „Arhetip èsteta v diskursah povestvovatelâ i liričeskogo geroâ A. Mariengofa 1920-h godov”. Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta družby narodov. Seriâ: Literaturovedenie, žurnalistika, 1, 2015, s. 7–17. Web. 06.05.2024. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/arhetip-estetav-diskursah-povestvovatelya-i-liricheskogo-geroya-a-mariengofa-1920-h-godov.
Kafanova, Olʹga. „Avdotʹâ Panaeva meždu publičnymi ličnym prostranstvom”. ILCEA, 29, 2017. Web. 06.05.2024. http://journals.openedition.org/ilcea/4296.
Karimova, Rimma, Galina Mišina. „Adûlʹter v russkoj i nemeckoj literature konca XIX v.”. Vestnik TGPU, 5 (211), 2020, s. 155–163. Web. 06.05.2024. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/adyulterv-russkoy-i-nemetskoy-literature-kontsa-xix-v. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23951/1609-624X-2020-5-155-163
Klimova, Marina. „Sûžetnaâ shema «velikodušnyj starik» i narodno-pravoslavnaâ duhovnaâ tradiciâ”. Vestnik TGPU. Seriâ: Gumanitarnye nauki (Filologiâ), 3 (40), 2004, s. 90–94.
Kločan, Anastasiâ. „Funkcionirovanie arhetipa «padšej ženŝiny» v russkoj literature”. Russkaâ literatura. Filologičeskij aspekt, 5 (13), 2016. Web. 06.05.2024. https://scipress.ru/philology/articles/funktsionirovanie-arkhetipa-padshej-zhenshhiny-v-russkoj-literature.html.
Knapp, Liza. „Dostoevsky and the novel of adultery: The adolescent”. Dostoevsky Studies, New Series, XVII, 2013, s. 37–71. Web. 06.05.2024. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/235190399.pdf.
Knapp, Liza. „Experts on Anna Karenina”. OPRAH.COM. 31.05.2004. Web. 06.05.2024. https://www.oprah.com/oprahsbookclub/experts-on-anna-karenina/all.
Kotin, Andrej. „Motiv grehovnoj strasti i supružeskoj nevernosti v romanah V. Nabokova Korolʹ, dama, valet i Kamera obskura”. Problemy istoričeskoj poètiki, 19 (3), 2021, s. 255–275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15393/j9.art.2021.9322
Kreknina, Lûdmila. „Transformaciâ sûžeta o «zloj žene» v povesti F.M. Dostoevskogo Hozâjka”. Dergačevskie čteniâ – 2002. Russkaâ literatura: nacionalʹnoe razvitie i regionalʹnye osobennosti: materialy VI Vserossijskoj naučnoj konferencii. Ekaterinburg, 2004, s. 114–117.
Kučko, Valeriâ. „Russkaâ dialektnaâ leksika s označeniem izmeny v lûbvi: semantiko-motivacionnyj aspekt”. Slavânskij alʹmanah, 3–4, 2017, s. 479–498.
Kupreânova, Elizaveta. „Vyraženie èstetičeskih vozzrenij i nravstvennyh iskanij L. Tolstogo v romane Anna Karenina”. Russkaâ literatura, 3, 1960, s. 117–137.
Leckie, Barbara. Culture and adultery: The novel, the newspaper, and the law, 1857–1914. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, 1999. Web. 06.05.2024. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt173zmrs.
Mariengof, Anatolij. Roman bez vranʹâ. Ciniki. Moj vek, moâ molodostʹ. Leningrad, Hudožestvennaâ literature, 1988.
Markovits, Stefanie. „Adulterated form: Violet Fane and the Victorian verse-novel”. ELH, 81 (2), 2014, s. 635–661. Web. 06.05.2024. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24475636. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/elh.2014.0019
Melʹnikova, Nadežda. Arhetip grešnicy v russkoj literature Koncaxix – načala XX veka. Dissertaciya kandidata filologicheskih nauk. Moskva, 2011. Web. 06.05.2024. https://www.philol.msu.ru/~ref/avtoreferat2011/melnikova.pdf.
Mendelsohn, Daniel. “How infidelity helped create the novel”. Town & Country, May 2, 2019. Web. 06.05.2024. https://www.townandcountrymag.com/leisure/arts-and-culture/a27011169/howinfidelity-helped-create-the-novel/.
Murtazina, Darʹâ. „Pereosmyslenie prozy A.B. Mariengofa v russkoâzyčnoj žurnalistike: ot perestrojki do naših dnej”. Nauka i škola, Web. 06.05.2024. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/pereosmyslenie-prozy-a-b-mariengofa-v-russkoyazychnoy-zhurnalistike-ot-perestroyki-donashih-dney.
Murtazina, Darʹâ. „Recepciâ prozaičeskih proizvedenij A.B. Mariengofa v russkoâzyčnoj žurnalistike v 1926–1929-h gg.”. Voprosy žurnalistiki, pedagogiki, âzykoznaniâ, 39 (3), 2020. Web. 06.05.2024. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/retseptsiya-prozaicheskih-proizvedeniy-a-bmariengofa-v-russkoyazychnoy-zhurnalistike-v-1926-1929-h-gg.
Napoli, Klaudio. „Slovarʹ-ukazatelʹ sûžetov i motivov russkoj literatury i materialy. Zametki ob odnom sibirskom proekte”. TSQ, 39, 2012, s. 254–273.
Overton, Bill. The novel of female adultery love and gender in continental European fiction, 1830–1900. Palgrave Macmillan, 1996. Web. 06.05.2024. https://www.amazon.com/Novel-Female-Adultery-Continental-1830-1900/dp/0333614518.
Perepëlkin, Mihail, Kseniâ Morozova. „Apokalipsispo-russki: rasskaz A.K. Golʹdebaeva Gnomy v kontekste russkoj literaturyrubeža ХIХ–ХХ vv.”. Tekst. Kontekst. Intertekst, 3 (42), 2020, s. 18–30. Web. 06.05.2024. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/apokalipsis-po-russki-rasskaz-a-kgoldebaeva-gnomy-v-kontekste-russkoy-literatury-rubezha-hih-hh-vv.
Pfeiffer, Peter. „Genre, gender, and aesthetic evaluation of novels of adultery”. Colloquia Germanica, 52 (1/2), 2021. Web. 06.05.2024. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26976016/.
Pierce, Catherine. „«Guilt is magical»: Adultery as poetic villainy”. New Ohio Review. Winter Online Exclusive. Web. 06.05.2024. https://newohioreview.org/2017/05/20/guilt-is-magicaladultery-as-poetic-villainy.
Polâkova, Natalʹâ. „Motiv adûlʹtera (nevernoj ženy) i ego rešenie v Barone Rejhmane M.S. Žukovoj”.
Russkij âzyk i literatura v polikulʹturnom kommunikativnom prostranstve. Materialy Meždunarodnoj naučnoj konferencii. V 2-h častâh. Častʹ II. Pskov, Pskovskij gosudarstvennyj universitet, 2012, s. 324–329.
Pumpânskij, Lev. Klassičeskaâ tradiciâ. Moskva, Âzyki russkoj literatury, 2000.
Rešetov, Dmitrij. Romany G. Flobera „Madam Bovari” i L.N. Tolstogo „Anna Karenina”: filosofsko-èstetičeskoe osmyslenie problem samoubijstva. Avtoreferat dissertacii kandidata filologicheskih nauk. Magnitogorsk, 2005. Web. 06.05.2024. http://www.dslib.net/literatura-mira/romany-g-flobera-madam-bovari-i-l-n-tolstogo-anna.html.
Russkij imažinizm: istoriâ, teoriâ, praktika. Red. V.A. Drozdkov, A.N. Zakharov, T.K. Savchenko. Moskva, IMLI RAN, 2005.
Schwartz, Alexandra. „New kind of adultery novel”. The New Yorker, July 24, 2017. Web. 06.05.2024. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/07/31/a-new-kind-of-adultery-novel.
Sienkiewicz, Martyna. „Motiv izmeny v „Zashite Luzhina” Vladimira Nabokova”. Studia Wschodniosłowiańskie, 17, 2017, s. 89–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15290/sw.2017.17.07
Sinâkova, Lûdmila. „Metamorfozy i snovideniâ v poètike povesti A.P. Čehova Drama na ohote: fabula isûžet”. Izvestiâ Smolenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 3 (35), 2016, s. 14–22.
Solev, Kosta. Problema „duhovnoj” i „plotskoj” lûbvi v mirovozzrenii i hudožestvennom tvorčestve Л.N. Tolstogo, 1850-1900 gody. Avtoreferat dissertacii kandidata filologicheskih nauk. Moskva, 2000. Web. 06.05.2024. https://rusneb.ru/catalog/000199_000009_000302683/?ysclid=lvv4ozlz1a575052424.
Surkova, Žanna. Poètika romana L.N. Tolstogo „Anna Karenina”: idilličeskie motivy i èshatologičeskaâ simvolika. Avtoreferat dissertacii kandidata filologicheskih nauk. Ivanovo, 2003. Web. 06.05.2024. http://www.dslib.net/russkaja-literatura/pojetika-romana-l-n-tolstogoanna-karenina.html.
Šatin, Ûrij. „Muž, žena i lûbovnik: semantičeskoe drevo sûžeta”. Materialy k „Slovarû sûžetov i motivov russkoj literatury”: Vyp. 2. Sûžet i motiv v kontekste tradicii. Novosibirsk, 1998, s. 56–64.
Šatin, Ûrij. „Tri Anny. Narratologiâ russkogo adûlʹtera”. Ûrij Šatin. Russkaâ literatura v zerkale semiotiki. Moskva, Âzyki russkoj literatury, 2015, s. 122–128.
Šenol, Ali Osman. Problema „Rossiâ i Zapad” v romane L.N. Tolstogo „Anna Karenina”: istoriko-funkcionalʹnyj aspekt. Avtoreferat dissertacii kandidata filologicheskih nauk. Moskva, 2017. Web. 06.05.2024. https://www.prlib.ru/item/1163329.
Šestakova, Èleonora. „Labirinty inakovosti v romane Anatoliâ Mariengofa Ciniki”. Motyw inności w literaturach i kulturach słowiańskich. Red. Ewa Pańkowska, Joanna Dziedzic, Anna Alsztyniuk. Lublin, Wydawnictwo Episteme, 2022, s. 109–151.
Šestakova, Èleonora. „Poètika adûlʹtera v hudožestvennom mire I.A. Bunina”. Pìvdennij arhìv. Fìlologìčnì nauki. Zbìrnik naukovih prac, 84, 2020, s. 61–68.
Tanenbaum, Michelle. „Staging a rewriting: Madame Bovary and the romantic interpretation of Don Quixote”. Review of Japanese Culture and Society, 18, 2006, s. 32–45. Web. 06.05.2024. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42800225.
Tanner, Tony. Adultery in the novel: contract and transgression. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. Web. 06.05.2024. https://muse.jhu.edu/book/72321.
Turgenev, Ivan. Vešnie vody: Povesti. Stihotvoreniâ v proze. Kiev, Rad. škola, 1988.
Utell, Janine. „A language for two: Elizabeth Smart, George Barker, and writing adultery”. CEA Critic, 74 (2/3), 2012, s. 144–157. Web. 06.05.2024. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44378476.
Ûnusova, Faniâ, Ilʹdar Ûnusov. „Razrešenie dilemmy «semʹâ – lûbovʹ» v russkoj klassičeskoj literaturе”. Culture and Civilization, 8 (1А), 2018, s. 268–277.
Varakina, Elena. „Myslʹ semejnaâ” i mesto hristianskih motivov v romane M. Kučerskoj „Tetâ Motâ”. Web. 06.05.2024. https://st-hum.ru/content/varakina-er-mysl-semeynaya-i-mestohristianskih-motivov-v-romane-m-kucherskoy-tetya-motya.
Veselovskij, Aleksandr. Izbrannye statʹi. Leningrad, Hudožestvennaâ literatura, 1939.
Vipper, Ûrij. Tvorčeskie sudʹby i istoriâ. Moskva, Hudožestvennaâ literatura, 1990.
Volʹpert, Larisa. „Plan Puškina «L’homme du monde» i roman Ž.-A. Anselo Svetskij čelovek (motiv «nevernoj ženy»)”. Studia Russica Helsingiensia et Tartuensia, 4, 1995, s. 87–103.
Whisman, Albert. Bovarysme beyond Bovary: From the psyche to the text. Web. 06.05.2024. https://shareok.org/bitstream/handle/11244/319115/Whisman_ou_0169D_10728.pdf?sequence=1.
Zakirov, Almaz, Albina Sayapova, Olga Andryushchenko. The incident in forming adultery motif in the artistic structure of the novel „Anna Karenina” by Leo Tolstoy. Web. 06.05.2024. https://revistapublicando.org/revista/index.php/crv/article/view/951/pdf_706.
Zaveršinskaâ, Elena. „Francuzskoe prostranstvo v romane L. Tolstogo Anna Karenina”. Sibirskij filologicheskij zhurnal, 4, 2009. Web. 06.05.2024. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/frantsuzskoe-prostranstvo-v-romane-l-tolstogo-anna-karenina.
Zaveršinskaâ, Elena. Slovesnyj i telesnyj diskursy v romanah G. Flobera „Madam Bovari” i L.N. Tolstogo „Anna Karenina”. Web. 06.05.2024. http://www.dslib.net/teoria-literatury/slovesnyj-i-telesnyj-diskursy-v-romanah-g-flobera-madam-bovari-i-l-n.html.
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2024 Eleonora Shestakova
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowe.