Słowa kluczowe
contemporary Russia
nostalgia
migration culture
underground culture
Jak cytować
Liczba wyświetleń: 131
Liczba pobrań: 54
Abstrakt
The article aims at illustrating Russian authors’ main ideological perspectives expressed in 2022 concerning the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Growing waves of patriotism and imperialism in the Russian Federation are at the basis of the aggression. Under the influence of restorative nostalgia, the government perceives itself as the heir of the bygone greatness of the Soviet Union, that must then be re-established. Because of closer and closer political relations between Ukraine and Europe from 2010s on, the Russian government perceives the former as the traitor of the commonly shared Soviet past. Hence, the Soviet dichotomy between us and them is reintroduced to define Russia and Ukraine respectively. This opposition can be used to classify Russian authors on the basis of their opinions regarding the aggression expressed in the journalistic field; those who publicly side with power in Russia are us, while them labels authors who choose either migration or underground culture to oppose the Russian government.
Bibliografia
Alexander, Jeffrey. Trauma. A social theory. Cambridge, Polity, 2012.
Assmann, Aleida. „Canon and Archive”. Media and Cultural Memory. Eds. Astrid Erll, Ansgar Nünning. Berlin, De Gruyter, 2008, s. 97–108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110207262.2.97
Assmann, Aleida. Formen des Vergessens. Göttingen, Wallstein Verlag, 2016.
Assmann, Jan. „Communicative and cultural memory”. Culture memory studies: An international and interdisciplinary handbook. Eds. Astrid Erll, Ansgar Nünning. Berlin, De Gruyter, 2008, s. 109–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110207262.2.109
Berdâev, Nikolaj Aleksandrovič. „O vlasti prostranstv nad russkoj dušoj”. Russkaâ ideâ. Osnovnye problemy mysli XIX veka i načala XX veka. Sud’ba Rossii. Red. Nikolaj Berdâev. Moskva, Izdatel’stvo V. Ševčuk, 2000, s. 279–284.
Berdnikova, Elena. „GRAD polzučij”. Novaâ gazeta, 16.09.2022.
Boele, Otto, Boris Noordenbos, Ksenia Robbe. „The many practices of post-Soviet nostalgia: Affect, appropriation, contestation”. Post-Soviet nostalgia. Confronting the empire’s legacy. Eds. Otto Boele, Boris Noordenbos, Ksenia Robbe. New York–London, Routledge, 2020, s. 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429318931-1
Bojm, Svetlana. The future of nostalgia. New York, Basic Books, 2001.
Borisova, Marina. „Rossijskij pisatel’ Vladimir Sorokin želaet pobedy Ukraine”. Deutsche Welle, 25.04.2022.
Grenoble, Leonore A. Language policy in the Soviet Union. New York, Boston–Dordrecht–London–Moscow, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48083-2
Hrytsak, Yaroslav. „Russia’s Problems Go Far Beyond Putin”. Time, 5.04.2022.
Karatnycky, Adrian. „Ukraine’s Orange Revolution”. Foreign Affairs, 84 (2), 2005, s. 35–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/20034274
Khazanov, Anatoly. „Whom to Mourn and Whom to Forget? (Re)constructing Collective Memory in Contemporary Russia”. Perpetrators, Accomplices and Victims in Twentieth-Century Politics. Eds. Anatoly Khazanov, Stanley Payne. London–New York, Routledge, 2009, s. 132–149.
Khinkulova, Kateryna. „Hello, Lenin? Nostalgia on Post-Soviet Television in Russia and Ukraine”. Journal of European Television History and Culture, 1 (2), 2012, s. 94–104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18146/2213-0969.2012.jethc022
„Kto hočet žertv? Obraŝenie pisatelej Rossii po povodu specialʹnoj operacii našej armii v Donbasse i na territorii Ukrainy”. Literaturnaâ gazeta, 28.02.2022. Web. 30.09.2024. https://tinyurl.com/595uwntd.
LaCapra, Dominik. Writing history, writing trauma. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000.
Lyotard, Jean-François. La condition postmoderne. Paris, Éditions de minuit, 1979.
„Maria Stepanova: The war of Putin’s imagination”. Financial Times. 18.03.2022. Web. 30.09.2024. https://www.ft.com/content/c2797437-5d3f-466a-bc63-2a1725aa57a5.
Medvec, Stephen. „The European Union and expansion to the East: Aspects of accession, problems, and prospects for the future”. International Social Science Review, 84 (1/2), 2009, s. 66–83.
„Meždunarodnoe obraŝenie pisatelej po povodu vojny – k tem, kto govorit na russkom âzyke”. Meduza, 5.03.2022. Web. 30.09.2024. https://meduza.io/feature/2022/03/05/mezhdunarodnoeobraschenie-pisateley-po-povodu-voyny-k-tem-kto-govorit-na-russkom-yazyke.
Osipov, Maksim. „Zâbko, stydno, osvoboždënno”. Novaâ gazeta, 8.05.2022.
Pro ROAR. Web 24.04.2022. https://roar-review.com/ROAR-9f9105e0f81e4d9da804a9ed41ed0bb2.
„Protiv pisatelâ Dmitriâ Gluhovskogo vozbudili delo o «fejkah» pro armiŭ”. Meduza, 7.06.2022. Web. 30.09.2024. https://meduza.io/feature/2022/06/07/protiv-pisatelya-dmitriya-gluhovskogo-vozbudili-delo-o-feykah-pro-armiyu.
Puleri, Marco. Ukrainian, Russophone, (Other) Russian. Hybrid Identities and Narratives in Post-Soviet Culture and Politics. Losanne, Peter Lang, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3726/b17031
Putin nazval raspad SSSR tragediej i „raspadom istoričeskoj Rossii”, 12.12.2021. Web. 30.09.2024. https://www.rbc.ru/politics/12/12/2021/61b5e7b79a7947689a33f5fe.
Solchanyk, Roman. „Russian language and Soviet politics”. Soviet Studies, 34 (1), 2009, s. 23–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09668138208411394
Tarošcina, Slava. „Prišestvie epohi Z. Koncert v «Lužnikach» pokazal novoe lico Rossii”. Novaâ gazeta, 18.03.2022.
„Tekst obraŝeniâ Vladimira Putina k rossiânam i sootečestvennikam na Ukraine”. RIA Novosti. Web. 22.02.2022. https://ria.ru/20220222/obraschenie-1774258993.html.
Ulickaâ o posledstviâh vojny: „Èto budet bol’šaâ travma”. Web. 01.04.2022. https://www.dw.com/ru/ljudmila-ulizkaya-esli-vojna-budet-ostanovlena-eto-budet-zasluga-zhenchin/a-61326679.
Ušakin, Sergej. „«Nam ètoj bol’ŭ dyšat’?» О travme, pamâti i soobŝestvach”. Travma: punkty. Red. Sergej Ušakin, Elena Trubina. Moskva, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2009, s. 5–41.
Volkan, Vamik. „Transgenerational transmissions and chosen traumas: An aspect of large-group identity”. Group Analysis, 34 (1), 2001, s. 79–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/05333160122077730
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2025 Lara Righi
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowe.